Members cara mia Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 As for P3 possibly being gay. I don't think that P3 would have faked his death solely because of his sexuality. He had many other pressures. The war between Jill & Kay. Being a father at a young age. Having a wife who loved him more than he loved her, even if he did care for her. Being the heir to this huge fortune. And, most importantly, the alcoholism. All of that plus secretly struggling with his sexuality might have been too much for him. Sharon's had a damn nervous breakdown just because of Nick's inability to pick a woman and stick with her. P3 was a lot younger than Sharon is now and the whole lifetime of pressure on P3 could have easily led him to snap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members edgeofnik Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 A couple of things in addition to my earlier post. 1) Would P3 really have abandoned P4 after not ever knowing his father? That's a BIG stretch. 2) With all the talk at the wedding of how P3 will alwasy be Jill's son, I still think Cane is the real one. This guy is probably the twin of the kid Kay stole. This could end up being a hot mess. The more I think about this story, the less interested I am in following it. As far as Daddy Bell regretting killing P3, he also regretted Malcolm sleeping with Dru and we were promised that Lily would always be Neil daughter.... we know how that turned out. There's no need to change history with a show as rich as Y&R (e.g., It was so cool to see the MD tell Hope & Victor when Adam was baby that he could inherit Hope's eye condition.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Cane shouldn't still be Jill's son, or else there was no reason at all to have Thom Bierdz come back, that's just f-cking with your audience - not cool. I'm sure the explanation will by wonky, and I'll hate the execution. But in the end, if Cane isn't Jill's son, I'll be happy just for that. History was already re-written for lame-ass Cane anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Scryber96 Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Why not? He'd still be playing the guy she raised for all those years and thought of as her son. He's still the guy that was with Nina and the father of her son. He's just not a blood relative anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 I think what you are saying makes sense. That was a lot of pressure and I could buy into it. It's a rewrite, but I don't think it's unforgivable. A lot more is behind Sharon's breakdown than Nick not being able to pick a woman though. I think this is a culmination of things starting with Cassie's death, Noah almost drowning, Guilt over Brad drowning and the end of another marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Cane isn't a defined character and Goddard sucks. It's OK if Jill still thinks of Cane as her son or whatever, but I want Cane's biological ties to the Chancellor family erased. He never should have "replaced" Phillip III in that sense. And with Cane there, it means that Phillip IV isn't the Chancellor heir, but Cane is. I'd much rather Phillip III and Philiip IV have blood ties to the Chancellor family than bloody Cane. I don't understand why Cane was created in the first place, he's always been such a waste of space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dm. Posted May 16, 2009 Author Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 There is nothing to understand. It was LML's creation so we can't exactly look for any deeper meaning. It was just whatever flew into her brain that day. ITA on the first line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 So Thom Bierdz is definetly playing Phillip? This isnt a doppleganger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dm. Posted May 16, 2009 Author Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 We don't know. That three-second appearance didn't go into detail, so I guess we'll learn later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Yes, of course...I think I am missing a point of controversy here. My speculations (or "rationalizations", as you seem to prefer to call them) are uniquely mine. Indeed, they are apparently "out there". You know, there is the usual cast of mixed opinion there. But I have actually been surprised, vis-a-vis this P3 twist, right now the mood is more consistently positive than it has been in a while. One user is consistently negative, but the rest are more mixed. P3/TB has confused a lot of people there though...since they don't follow the spoilers as much. So it surprised them, and several didn't know who Thom Bierdz was. But usenet traffic is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay down. Indeed, I graphed posting trends there earlier this week (see below). There is a discussion about whether that is due to reduced fanbase of the shows/decline of daytime, or just loss of some influential posters. (DonnaB, for example, almost never posts there anymore). Shock. I agree with every word above. Even if I don't judge Daniel Goddard quite as harshly. If this is a doppelganger, seriously, that might move me to quit. Seriously. William, Carmen's cousin, Allistair, Pheila...too many doppelgangers. Let's not forget Marge. ENOUGH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dm. Posted May 16, 2009 Author Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Yeah, we did have a doppelganger (and death) overload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Agreed. So a death reversal ought to be a nice change of pace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Sylph and Mark, please take your love affair to PM or in a new thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dm. Posted May 16, 2009 Author Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 So much about my prediction regarding this thread... it managed to beat last week's post count. It's crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted May 16, 2009 Members Share Posted May 16, 2009 Oh, don't worry. So far I have no more questions! You can start that whole Cane Must Die thing again if you'd like! That'll be something new and fresh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.