Jump to content

GH: May Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Mo, yes.

Steve, idk. He doesnt do it for the money, thats for sure, and i do think if someone came in and said here, play this, he would. He does a power play because they let him. I cn see SB adapting to change, but not MB or TG.

I really dont see JT leaving, ever. He is like Becky - a lifer. I also dont think he has been taken under MB's wing, so much as MB likes him and they get along.

JT has worked well eith everyone they have chem tested him with. esp LW and BH and LL. There is plenty of options for him and patrick.

Robin? Not so much. The only other person they could pair her with would be Jason IMHO. Maybe Lucky if the acotrs have chem..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't believe that there would be this mass exodus if Guza left which is he is never going to anyway. Acting work is hard to come by, especially in this economy. The reality is that these people have families that need a steady income and good health insurance. None of them are independently wealthy and can afford to quit. They would all suck it up stay. Kim McCullough even stated in the last Branco interview that although she was interested in pursuing her writing, that she was re-signing for the security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But if McCullough get a decent writing or directing gig? I think that is where her heart is. Sarah Brown's, too (at least the directing part). But I get the security thing. I have heard both Burton and Benard saying that they only trusted Guza with their characters. I can see that. Maybe Guza is not the worst of a bad bunch. Maybe they fear who Frons would hire as a replacement. I understand that it was Benard's outright refusal to play the Angel Boris SL that resulted in MMT getting canned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? That's an interesting assessment. I always got the impression that he was waiting for a chance at Primetime. Nothing concrete, just a vibe I got. He certainly has the looks for it. Becky Herbst and

Ric Hearst? I always assumed they were lifers.

But the JT/MB friendship is quite obvious from interviews. MB really seems to respect him. It shows on-screen, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, if these actors got better opportunities that brought a good income, they would leave, but not one of them is leaving just because Guza is fired or quits . He is not that important in their lives. He skipped off to NBC when he got Sunset Beach without a second thought and MB and SBur did not follow him. I think that MB and SBur do the necessary sucking up to get what they want from Guza and that is all. Guza won't be replaced, but if it ever happened they would deal with it. They would have no choice. Neither of them is Ric Hearst who can get another soap gig in a snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well Robin consulted her diary after learning Ethan's birthdate (though the date itself was not mentioned onscreen we got a general time frame). So apparently Luke and Holly's romp in Singapore took place at the same time that Robert was in PC helping Anna deal with Bert Ramsey (A.K.A Mr Big) in late 1986 (real time of course) placing Ethan's birth around the time that Holly was was initially presumed dead and (supposedly) in a coma (I'd love for GH to confirm this by having Holly actually tell Ethan that the reason she gave him up was because she had no choice and was in a coma).

So perhaps Holly didn't like it that Robert went off to help Anna sort out Ramsey, found herself in Singapore and ended up cheating on Robert with the only man that she would probably ever cheat on Robert with. I think Robert mentioned that he and Holly were having marital difficulties when she was presumed dead.

Of course while this may seem to definitively prove that Luke is the father, I think there's still a slim chance for Robert to be the dad because Robin based her assumptions on Ethan being a full term baby, they've mentioned "nine months" at least twice now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i would agree with you but for all the press quotes from tony geary when he's nominated for a daytime emmy. he goes on and on about how happy he is, how it's so great to be recognized at his age, that he's happy with the writing, blah, blah, blah.

in addition to everything else, TG is annoying because he seems to respect the daytime emmy awards, a total crapfest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't place much significance on the timeline. Remember Ethan was not only conceived while Burt Ramsey was Mr Big, but he is also, to quote Lucky, the same age as Lulu. Guza couldn't remember Emily was adopted, you think he can remember what year Burt Ramsey was on the show? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah you are absolutely right there, when it all comes down to it timelines don't really have that much significance in the grand scheme of things, expecially with SORASing and a revisionist history headwriter involved. But for now the Bert Ramsey reference has made it a lot easier to rationalize where Ethan is supposed to fit in. I mean it still doesn't completely gel with the emotional history of the characters (and Lucky's comment about Ethan being Lulu's age throws things off too but Sorasing always does that) but at least there is a general time frame in which to place him in. So until Guza contradicts himself (which i'm certain he will eventually) i'm taking the Bert Ramsey reference and running with it for the time being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy