Jump to content

B&B: Bring back Rick Hearst!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

B&B should strike while the iron is hot and bring back Rick Hearst as Whip Jones. Jackie could hire him at Jackie M or he could work for

.

Or if they don't want to bring Whip back they could always hire him as Taylor's brother Zach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Unless Bill Bell rose from his grave to take over the reins of B&B, I honestly would not wish the show on as talented an actor as Rick Hearst. Bradley Bell needs to show that he can value the host of great characters who already willfully ignores on his canvas first.

Co-sign on the Sean Kanan wish, though. He invigorated the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hm... Is this a contradiction: you don't want talented actors on a show, but you'd like Sean Kanan? I hate Sean Kanan, I wish you thought his character was awful, you obviously don't. One rule for Hearst, the other for Kanan?

Kanan sucks. His character, too. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I don't think you get is that there is a substantial contingent of us that hates Forresters. Loathes them. Finds them entitled and irresponsible and perverse.

For us, the pleasure has always come from watching the malevolent outsiders knock them down a peg.

  • Sally Spectra, who got in a few good blows.
  • Massimo, the only man who ever talked to Eric like the lecherous slime he is
  • Deacon, who did to the Forresters what Rick is doing to Ridge now...but who had incendiary chemistry with Stephanie. As she does with so many, Flannery appealed to Deacon's desperate need for a mother
  • Amber Moore, who beat Brooke at her own slutty game
  • Angela, who exposed the hypocrisy of "close family" among the Forresters -- when she showed that an "imperfect" Forrester was not worthy of being acknowledged
  • Sheila, the ultimate outsider, who only wanted love and acceptance. When it was denied to her, her schemes were delicious

Each of these outsiders received more audience love than disdain, at least during their initial runs. And that is because the audience hates the Forresters. HATES 'em (except for Stephanie).

So, yes, we need Deacon and Whip and Amber and Sheila ... or suitable replacements. The Forresters need so badly to be taught some lessons right now. To a one, every single one is acting like an irredeemable ass right now.

My hope is that

is the next in a line of people who can teach Eric and his spoiled brats some lessons.

Stephanie, telling "grandpa" that she was gonna "show him" was a delight. Stephanie is the ULTIMATE Forrester adversary (if they let her be). She will do this with strength, and I hope she brings that lecherous Viagra popper down to his knees BEGGING for mercy.

Even a few weeks ago, when someone was stealing Forrester designs and giving them to the Marones. The chat on here and elsewhere was "I wonder who" and "this is fun"...NOT "oh those poor Forresters". A few of us would like to see those folks humbled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see how my statement is contradictory. :huh: Whip was a character with a lot of potential, yes -- humor, not afraid to pull on women's lingerie, chemistry with everyone, and a secret past involving a rather intense mother and a fixation with Forrester Creations. Alas, Bradley Bell dispensed with his services a few months' later and buried the SL. That speaks volumes. If the EP/HW is not willing to put in the groundwork in a new character played by (IMO) one of Daytime's most accomplished actors, what can I do about it?

Again and again, interesting characters and the actors who play them are thrown to the wayside in favor of blowhards like Jack Wagner, talentless hair models like Ronn Moss and the underrated but sleepwalking Katherine Kelly Lang who has been on Blow-Up Doll Mode.

I like Rick Hearst too much as an actor to see him subjected to that indignity (I felt the same way with how Eileen Davidson was treated). He's already been through all that with GH. I honestly think that RH should be playing characters who become leads -- he has the stature and talent of a lead actor.

As for Sean Kanan, I actually think he's somewhat talented, too. More than that, though, the character of Deacon is (or was) embedded in the canvas of the show. He is "Little Eric's" dad -- you know, the kid the Forresters swore they would treat as if he were their own flesh and blood before he was shipped back to Furnace Creek? He is Hope's father. He was in love with Amber. Married to Bridget. Shtupped her mom. Headed marketing at FC. Shtupped Jackie. He is the troublemaker of the show. Bradley has been trying to write characters like him ever since he left -- Shane, Owen, now Rick. This sort of anatgonist is needed because he pisses everybody off and because the Brooke/Stephanie rivalry is played out. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy