Jump to content

Van Hansis acting is so bad!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I totally see what you are saying. But it's like when I see Noah and Luke, IMO they always seem to play the damsel in distress thing with one another.

Noah is sad about this, Luke is sad about that. blah, blah, blah...

Luke reminds me of a watered down version of Justin from QAF and Noah reminds me of a watered down Mikey. I think that's where the problem lies when I am watching them. Now I know that these are two totally different shows, BUT, I don't feel like their personalities compliment one another. I think this is one of the main reasons a lot of viewers on here, including myself think it would be interesting if another gay character came into play to rock their little worlds.

The thing is, I would really enjoy Luke a hell of a lot more if he was running around doing all this good stuff for gays like he is trying to do with the foundation, but at the same time, trying to find love and acceptance from a guy who has totally different morals and opinions on things. Someone to totally contrast with Luke's ideals about life. It would be more compelling IMO if Luke were chasing after a guy who is a little older, a guy who is polished, professional, who doesn't care what the world thinks, someone who is selfish and really, really, f'ing hot. A man who is confident to know he can lay anyone he wants, whenever he wants. And he gets so much pleasure out of torturing Luke, because he knows Luke wants him so much, and he loves the chase.

The same thing goes for Noah. It would be more interesting if he were paired with another gay character, but unlike the one I described for Luke's, someone who is like a party boy, like all around circuit boy who loves to get wild, doesn't think about the consequences, get's in a lot of trouble, and Noah always has to bail his ass out, but they see something in one another.

I think to liven Luke and Noah up a bit too, they need to explore other gay issues that can effect their lives. For example, what I described for Noah, he can get involved with a sketchy circuit boy who loves to party and when I say party I mean ski and this character could have participated in a lot of promiscuity, protected and unprotected. Noah and he could have sex, a condom could break, it would rock Noah's entire world. It could affect Luke too because it could make Luke question his desire for the guy I described for him. Fortunately, I would hope that everything would turn out for the better for all of these guys, but it all brings more depth and reality to their respective characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always saw Luke with an older man. Brian was a little too old, but I think a great story would be Luke hitting the city, discovering party boy land, drinking a lot, getting promiscuous and crashing and burning until Brian comes back into his life and straightens him out. I don't know if that would lead to romance but it would certainly make for compelling television.

As for Noah, I don't know if I would pair him with a party boy or just leave the show, LOL. He really just seems to exist for Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nice post. IMO...Luke is becoming too much like Noah. Both characters are now wishy washy...downers....so boring as a couple. One character needs to be more dominate. Both are poor as me attitude. Which makes for a boring pairing to watch on screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was enjoying the dynamics between Brian and Luke. But then the story ended so quickly without fully developing the story. It is a shame that both Brian's and Luke's coming out started well but ended with a big thud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Emily has four cousins, quadruplets, and they were all born circa 1984. With the appropriate SORASing, the show could easily introduce one of those quads at a guy in his late 20s/early 30s. It would be two birds with one stone for me: getting Luke in an interesting relationship and revitalizing the Stewarts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are just full of good ideas on this, I'm loving it!

Bringing on a Stewart is perfect. It would be a legacy character and like you said, it would revitalize the Stewart's. And Emily could be like a fag hag or fruit fly. I can totally see her getting down with her cuz, trying to find some potential guys for him, and then Luke comes prancing in.

Then we can still have that David Lago character lurking around the corner, waiting to just swoop in and catch his prey.

I could always see Carly hanging out with a guy who is her gay bff. That would be entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's because they both suck at life.

Too bad MADD Dawg isn't Executive in Charge of Production anymore. I bet she would have canned him 2 years ago and JP if her position wasn't eliminated in 2005.

I bet Wendy Riche would be a good EP for ATWT. MADD Dawg should have gotten Linda Gottlieb for GL instead of Conboy in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Say what you will about MADD (and she deserves a lot of it), but NO WAY would she choose personal loyalty over falling ratings. They would have been out.

Not saying the people who replaced them wouldn't have made matters worse. But there's no way she would have held on to anybody whose numbers fell that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I was saying above. They would have been gone by 2007. Maybe 2006 the earliest.

And like I also said above, I wish that she choose to replace Rauch with Linda Gottlieb. I think she would have really, really helped GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't thought about what HW she would hire, but I know she would turn it into a critically acclaimed soap (like it used to be), just like she did with GH.

If Gottlieb became EP of GL in 2003, I think she would have held onto Millie Taggart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy