Jump to content

ATWT: April discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've always thought there was more to the story of Byrne's leaving than just her guarantee/money. Personally, I think she saw the writing on the wall----her Lily wasn't going to get free of Holden, and she wasn't going to get any more romantic story. She'd be "Luke's mom", and that's about it.

As for Beck....yep, she stinks as Lily. TIIC haven't helped, giving her the same weak-assed "teen heroine" stories they wrote for Byrne. The only reason I think her appearances have held on par with Byrne's is the initial story push to sell her as Lily. (Does anyone see MB opposite the last nuMike, sluttin' it up with him on her couch?) Since Ethan was rescued from the well ( the de facto end of the Holden/Carly affair) I think they've dropped considerably, although I'd have to check the stats to verify. It seems she goes missing for huge chunks of time though.

It's too bad TIIC were so attached to having "Lily" on the canvas. I keep wondering what Beck could do if she wasn't saddled playing Lily. I was thinking....maybe she could have been Margo's sister Cricket. Someone tied to the canvas, but almost completely free to put their stamp on a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think a Damian and Meg romance would fail totally! Just no! What is with TIIC obsession with all things Meg? She is dreary and boring.

I was hoping for a storyline where Luke and Damian reconnected. I guess I'm not even going to get more than 3 minutes of that.

I loved the past week. I just wish there were more of a focus on Luke and Noah and how it affected their relationship. Instead it focused more on Zac and Zoe's craziness and Holden's bad attitude. Luke and Noah being tortured and mindmucked could have been a great storyline. They could have shown them bonding through the ordeal and becoming a stronger couple. They need a headwriter who will not ignore them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You couldn't possibly be talking about "Nurse Joy" because if you are that blasphemous!! :lol:

NUKE was doomed from the start. IMO there was never any real intent by TPTB to tell a comprehensive story about them. They were used as a ploy to attract more viewers and attract them they did. NUKE could be considered the ultimate bait and switch.

The perils of Luke has been a thread running through ATWT for the last umpteen years, starting with him being a Gramaldi and continuing until now with him being a GRAMALDI. He (IMO) has always been insufferable with his spoiled sense of entitlement---then again that's how he was raised. I liked him best when Rose was alive because she seem to get him. Jade(Rose's daugther) kind of got him too, but their relationship has all but been dissolved. And then there's the fact that he is still the youngest members of the JokeDale young adult set (Ali/Casey/Jade/Maddie/etc) that never gets mentioned.

It's to bad that the fans who watch ATWT now (only because of Nuke) didn't watch back in the day because if that were the case, they might have a little more clarity as to why NUKE hasn't evolved more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For a long time I hoped Rose was not truly dead, but I can't see NB as Rose, so I guess that dream is gone.

I was just watching some old clips of Emma and Iva and I realized that Seth, Iva, Holden, Caleb, Ellie, Meg, are all still alive. Usually when you have a family that big, you will have at least one of the children killed off. I guess Goutman and Passante probably don't even know Seth or Ellie exist, do they? It's just interesting because most big soap families, you have the death of a child, and how that would affect the matriarch and all the other siblings.

Emma did have a miscarriage when she was young, didn't she? Wasn't that part of Iva's backstory, that Emma and Henry adopted Iva because they thought Emma was barren?

Funny how that turned out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^^The way I remember it, Emma thought that after Seth, she couldn't get pregnant again. That (and the fact Jerrod and Caroline Carpenter couldn't provide for their new baby) led them to adopt her. Although I've never quite bought the fact that two people would give up their child if they could go back east and reclaim some family money.

That's why there's supposed to be a significant age gap between Seth and Caleb and the rest of the Snyder children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because it was all about Nuke. Y'know....if they want to convince me Luke and Noah are interesting...perhaps, just perhaps discussing German expressionist filmmaking and how the light reflects the director's p.o.v (or whatever that [!@#$%^&*] was) ISN'T the most effective way to go.

But it is nice to see Pissy has no qualms about recycling another tired ploy from her AMC days (threatening a gay character with rape) or Hogan's---the most disgusting episode ever, when he wrote Jack strapped into a wheelchair and raped by that psychobitch JuliaI.

You know it's the worst writing ever when you're rooting for little Luciano to be surprised with a bundle of joy in nine months. KNOWING that that would mean even more airtime for Luke as he "emoted" his angst all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy