Jump to content

CBS cancels Guiding Light


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Okay, this is an updated "time of death" chart. Let me say this chart REALLY challenged my "they're all going to die" hypothesis. Because, if you believe them, it says three soaps level off (see #6 below), and DO NOT REACH THE CANCELLATION THRESHOLD.

1. It only used the last decade of data

2. It did not impose a linear trajectory. So, any show could have whatever trajectory best fit it. Mostly, it was linear.

3. These models are VERY good. They never explain less than 95% of the variance in decline, and usually close to 99%. THINK ABOUT THAT. A simply model including ONLY THE YEAR explains 99% of the variance in ratings. You're going to have a hard time convincing me, when a model explains 99%, that other factors (like "writing" or "producing") matter. We can agree to disagree on that.

4. For years following the 2008-2009 season (here, denoted as 2008), the values are extrapolations or projections, imposing the same regression model.

5. The cancellation threshold was set at 1.5 HH rating. That remains simplistic and ignores lots of other variables.

6. Because I did not require a linear trajectory, three soaps (B&B, GL, and Y&R) ended up having fairly clear "cubic" functions. This model therefore estimated -- quite to my shock! -- that those three soaps would level off before hitting a 1.5 (and actually might uptick...but I don't believe that). Thus, it is not yet possible to estimate cancellation dates for those three shows! Knock me over with a feather, but I did not expect that cubic function.

death.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This does not tell me that ATWT is ALSO on the chopping block... this tells me that CBS is pissing off P&G, and they want to pick up ALL their marbles and play the game with someone else. I'm sure they feel their shows are not appreciated, because by all accounts, they DO still make a profit... just not the insane numbers they'd like to see. Considering the HUGE amount of sponsorship P&G provides for CBS, both daytime and primetime... multi million dollar deal.... over the course of decades...I bet P&G feels that CBS owes them the courtesy of not throwing their shows under the bus when we are in the middle of an economic downturn that we ALL KNOW is not going to last forever. CBS doesn't advertize the soaps on primetime... but thye sure as hell advertize their primetime lineup during GL and ATWT!! I'm sure they feel that CBS is just running their shows into the ground, not trying to do anything to keep them viable, just letting them go down the toilet in a constant downward spiral. Think about it. These shwos don't pull the ratings they did... but be assured, they are NOT losing money for CBS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I realize that the court and talk shows cost very little... my question is what kind of numbers do they pull? What are the people's court's numbers today compared to the days of judge Wapner and Doug Lewellyn? I think we need more information on the state of daytime as a whole before we can realsitically assess where soaps stand in relation to it all. In the 70's talk and game shows were just as cheap to produce as today, yet the networks still filled their lineups with soaps. Mike Douglas, Dinah, Merv Griffin, Phil Donahue, and the 10,000$ pyramid pulled good numbers.... and they were ALSO cheap to produce, but the networks didn't fill their ENTIRE daytime lineup with them. If they fill the ENTIRE daytime lineup with NOTHING but talk/game/court..... does the network think the public will NEVER tire of all that? Game shows burnt out in the 90's ( and resurged in the 2000's), tabloid talk is a shadow of it's former self. If nothing else, perhaps the cancellation of GL will prove to the networks that what they replace it with won't pull better numbers, and make them think twice before the axe falls again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

like i said in another thread.. Why it took so long? the real GL was off the air a long time ago. This GL is a walking zombie. I stopped watching in 2007 for good. They ruined the history of the show a long time ago and did not care about old fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am especially angry about the b.s. statement about their "talking this over with our partners Procter and Gamble and we agreed it was time." Uh, no, you blindsided P&G, and blindsided the show, after a misleading previous month where it seemed like GL could be renewed. Trying to shift the blame? Sorry, I'm not falling for it, CBS.

I am happy that P&G is trying to shop ATWT/GL to another network as a package deal. CBS has lost me as a viewer of any of their non-GL, non-ATWT programming. No more Big Brother or any other CBS show. I do not say these things and not mean them. I have not watched any NBC show for more than one or two episodes after they canceled Another World. I quit BBC America for good after they canceled EastEnders. Both times, I never looked back.

ABC/Frons may suck, but at least they didn't do *this*. It's gonna be all cable and ABC for me now, you can take that to the bank (unless CBS changes its mind or NBC picks up GL -- hey, stranger things have happened).

Bye bye CBS!

As for GL's history being lost long ago, I beg to differ. Phillip, Alex, Alan, Beth, Bill, Lizzie, Buzz, Reva, Billy, Josh, Lillian, Vanessa, Dinah, Shayne, Frank, Blake, Rick -- all these longtime characters were still around with the potential for story to tell about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I'm sure the meaning behind this decision isn't lost on anyone - unless you have a Nielsen box attached to your television (which you might - I have no idea), then this decision really doesn't affect anybody but you, yourself.

Just don't want you to miss Big Brother. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With GL's demos and overall ratings, I think CBS was more than justified to cancel the show. I know it's sad, but GL brings in relatively low ad revenue for CBS, thus continuing the show is not a wise investment for them any longer.

They kept the show on much longer than the ratings and ad revenue justified, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope that it's true that P&G is threatening to go elsewhere and take ATWT with them. I just hope that they're serious about keeping them going elsewhere. I already think that CBS made a very big, stupid mistake here but to do so against the wishes of it's biggest advertiser, worth over $300 million a year in ad revenue at a time when other companies like the Big3 are having to cut back on advertising, was monumentally insane especially if it's true that the only alternative they currently have for the timeslot is some lame-ass remake of $25,000 Pyramid. :rolleyes:

That may all be true but the what on earth is gonna do better for CBS in that time slot? A cheap, tacky retread game show? A tawdry talk show? A pointless reality show? A bunch of F-list "celebrities" sitting around drinking coffee and prattling about the news? Those things might all be cheaper but they'll also be a lot less watched and will have an audience with no brand loyalty. What really hurts about this is that GL didn't get cancelled last winter when there was nothing redeemable or even watchable about it. It didn't get cancelled in the midst of the truly godawful and downright humiliating clone and time travel stories. But now, when it's finally starting improving and showing true promise for the future, CBS axes it. Morons. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
    • I'm excited for us to get back to a full weeks worth of episodes and also us beginning to move into the episodes filmed once the show premiered. We're already starting to see changes in the lighting and the way certain characters are styled. Of course we know this week we have our first recast as well. After the big Eva reveal, I hope the show continues to move into a positive direction and that we see them starting to fix some of the things we've all had issues with.
    • It seems like they may have been going in one direction for Andre and then changed their mind. He had this player/bachelor thing going at first where he was messing with Dani, seemed to be feeling Eva, and then somehow smitten by bland Ashley of all people. I feel like Ashley was supposed to be the one that finally made him want to be with someone and settle. The way he talked her up in those earlier episodes was really confusing. The wonderful, amazing nurse Ashley and conveniently she's unattainable because she has a partner, but he can't stop thinking of her and takes these busted pics of her. It was a mess. However, it all seems to have been dropped. I honestly feel like Andre can go. That may be an unpopular opinion but I don't need his breathy final syllable to be content with BTG. It's always like "There's gotta be another wh-ahyy"
    • This is where McLaibey falls apart. It becomes clear that McTavish had not thought past Brent/Marion...so the energy drops and she starts throwing things at the wall (Blakes twins, Lonatrat.)   Fans HATED this funeral. Everyone is mad at everyone else, which is fine, the death of a beloved community figure would give people a reason to come together...(Quint and Nola could come together at least for  a bit to support each other, Nola and VAn could finally admit they kinda, sorta like each other) Its just an example of McTavish's mean writing.   I have a feeling they were going to make Dahlia Frank's kid but they chickened out. Making Tina a prostitute didn't help, they could have been lovers when they were young but felt society pressure to part. Marcus took over David's role (you can't have two young black men at that time...)   Get used to it...this will happen, the same storyline over and over until the end.
    • Does anyone happen to have a recording or any footage of Jennifer’s funeral?
    • It's such a shame that the conflict couldn't be resolved in a mature way between the two actors.. especially since Albee was a bigger asset for the show in terms of character and his popular will they/won't they pairing with Deborah Saxon. One of the things about Edge was that it was just as popular with male viewers as it was with women.  It's one of things I think the show forgot in the final year or two with the deemphasis on the male characters.
    • Daytime Confidential did a podcast of the worst mothers in soaps and here were their lists.  5.Felicia Scorpio 4.Reva Shayne 3.Dina Mergeron 2.Helena Cassadine/Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions- Stephanie Forrester,Ann Douglas, Phyllis Summers and Joanna Manning Joshua 5.Anna Devane 4.Diane Jenkins 3.Ava Vitali 2.Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions-Alexis Davis, Felicia Scorpio, Eve Donovan, Heather Webber, Natalia Ramirez, Stephanie Forrester,and Ruth Martin Luke 5.Natalia Ramirez 4.Diana Coville 3.Helena Cassadine 2.Alexis Davis 1.Arlene Vaughn Dishonorable Mentions-Stephanie Forrester Now for my comments. Wonder what Ruth Martin ever did to this guy?!!! I mean Ruth Martin? I don't get it. Next, IMO they are just picking on Eve Donovan. Who is Dina Mergeron? Same question  Joanna Manning? Diana Colville Is that because of the bad DAYS retcon of her being Leo Stark's mother? All of the rest, CO-SIGN!  
    • Thanks! Looking forward to reading the rest!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy