Jump to content

GH to go hi-def?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I go back and forth about Sarah Brown. Yes, she is talented, but GH does not need her or this particular character. She feels shoehorned into Sonny's life and it is all to forced and desperate. It is "let's get Sarah something to do and someone to play" rather than here is a character who can slide into Sonny's life and replace Kate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sarah Brown is extremely talented at playing herself. Well, a soapy, high-drama version of herself in the shape of OriginalCarly. There's no shame in it. Vanessa Marcil built her career on doing the same thing.

GH looooves the kind of actors who can "hit the high notes" during sweeps and improv a little to add color to certain scenes. Sarah is definitely that kind of actress. With Carly 1.0 she used to rake her hands through her hair and play with her hands nervously and bounce around her alloted camera space. As opposed to other soap actors who just stood there rigidly, delivering their lines.

She also lucked out with the writers who came up with Carly and wrote her stuff -- the Mulcaheys and Valjeans and Harrises.

So, in terms of technique, she's got a bag of tricks and does well. But I haven't seen any real difference between Carly or Julia or Claudia.

And like yesterday's show? The scene between Claudia and Olivia. If that was meant to be a battle, well, Lisa LoCicero won it. With no shouting or snark or "nuh-UH!" head movements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It isn't uncommon for an actor, who may be good at learning lines and developing their own style, to, essentially play the same part. It doesn't help that the writers of her respective soap characters have made all of those characters into poorly written versions of Carly.

For example: a film teacher once told me that it's not Jack Nicholson playing a role. It's Jack Nicholson playing himself playing (fill in blank).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA. Sarah Brown is good, but does not have a lot of range as an actress. It occurred to me that Sarah Brown is playing original Carly and Laura Wright is playing Cassie from GL. They both have slipped into their comfort zones as actresses, perhaps because these are the characters more like their real life personalities. The only actor who ever challenged Laura Wright since I have watched her soap career was David Andrew McDonald on GL. She did her best work with him. He is a strong talented actor who pushed her out of her Cassie niche to react to Edmund and she was good, but it didn't last long. The moment she wasn't paired with him, she slipped back into tame Cassie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy