Jump to content

GL: March Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Seriously, I know Dinah's bat**** crazy sometimes and did a terrible thing to Bill and Lizzie but EARTH TO MALLET: YOU'RE A FREAKING COLD-BLOODED MURDERER!!! And for some crazy reason that I'll never fathom, Dinah loved you enough to forgive you and protect your sorry ass. She even took a bullet in the head for your worthless butt! You just bought a baby off the Bosnian blackmarket and great-granddaddy Buzz has been running all over town looking for somebody who might be willing to off Alan Spaulding for him. But all that's totally cool and Dinah is unparalleled evil who must be shunned by all? :angry:

Ugh. Whatever. Self-righteous hypocrisy thy name is AC Mallet. Right now, I might actually prefer watching Lurch go over the next cliff instead of Jeffrey McRapist. I hate him that much right now.

Dinah's a tough character because she has no middle ground. She has a great capacity for love and loyalty but at her core, she is monumentally screwed up and will always make enormous mistakes and act-out in really horrible ways when she feels abandoned, betrayed, or scared. That's who she has always been and if that changes, she won't be Dinah anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Honestly Greg, I agreed with alot of what you said, but I disagree with this. I think it's much more important--like GL is somewhat doing now--to reintegrate a saner Phillip back into town and reestablish his relationships than it is to delve into that. Maybe somewhere down the line in a few months, then we can find out about the lowpoints of his recovery, but for now, I'm enjoying having the 'old' Phillip back.

As for Ross, I maintain that that plane stuff never happened and Ross is still alive albeit living a double life as Clint Buchanan. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get that. I guess I'm just over GT's continual jaw-jutting, head-bobbing, perpetual motion style of acting. The writing does her no favors...there isn't a lot that seems even remotely redeemable about Dinah. And there is like zero chemistry with Shayne.

I think someone somewhere decided that "Marina Mallet" was just horrible sounding. Apparently, it was easier to rename Mallet, and try and sweep it all under the rug, than try "Marina Cooper Mallet".

OH...and something that bugged me...Bill's dramatic declaration that "he has no sister". NICE TRY. Perhaps some lackey at the studio would like to remind him he's got TWO other sisters, Mindy (who was just in town) and Maureen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mindy was on the show a few weeks ago and Maureen makes occasional appearances; they may have forgotten Bill's related to them, but I think someone just decided that Bill saying, "I no longer have a sister named Dinah" wouldn't have as much dramatic impact.

I never liked GT when she was at OLTL, I can see where she can grate. I like many of her choices at GL and I like her with Shayne. She's exhausting but she always seems so visceral to me in a way I don't see on soaps as often now. Lisa Brown used to have this type of acting style. So raw.

Dinah's done so many terrible things...for some reason I never hold them against her. Maybe I'm still happy about her killing off Hart... :unsure:

Do you think they should have avoided a christening for the M&M baby, since Mallet was a godfather for Marina's christening and went on to marry her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LoL..I was waiting for dumb Frank to mention that when they asked him to be a godfather.

Sorry, I can't stand the Coopers together in their Super Duper Cooper way. Every last one of them grates...especially Bogue when he tries cute and hearty "Oh we need a godfather for our boy!" Plus, doenst it take longer to agree to be a godparent instead of just saying yes????

The Coopers as the MAIN family is really one of the main things holding this show back from its full potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually liked most of the show (I didn't really watch the Reva/Jeffrey scenes), but I would love to see Blake more. How cute when she says "Frankie". I'm glad the actors remember the history between the characters, even if the writers may not. Then her amusing interaction with Olivia.

Is Josh still a minister? I'm not sure how his superiors would feel about that very steamy flirting with his ex. Even if there were no Otalia, I'd never want them together again, because the Josh Lewis Moral Superiority Complex would roar back to life again at some point, but RN and CC have always have the chemistry.

I never like when any soap character says, "You have never hurt (me/him/her/them) more than they are hurting right now!!!" Bill's had a relatively easy soap life, but the torture he went through in Venezuela, and Ava passing off Remy's child as his, and having to spend so long in that mess with Eden, I'm sure those were more painful than Dinah and the kidnapping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hear ya, Dan. I like the "old" Phillip as well. I guess the thing that gets me is that it was THIS regime that fucked up Phillip to begin with. THEY are the ones responsible for that crazy Phillip we saw before they wrote him off. I could kinda understand if we had a new writing regime since that happened, but we don't. They have to own up to one of the worst character assassinations to ever hit GL (and daytime) IMHO.

I agree with you both on the Coopers. They should NOT be the core family of the show. It's ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

Lastly, let's not forget that before JLH was given the TITLE of Headwriter, she was still part of the credits as something (if I remember correctly) called "Story editor". I have no confidence that a simple change in title is the reason some people think that the writing has improved. It hasn't. There are still huge, huge gaps in story and the execution of the "story" is way off. Perhaps Otalia and Phillip are the best right now. But they blew it on Reva's preggy story. It could have been riveting. Everything else? Ugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if anyone believes a change in title is why the writing has improved. Some people probably just think the show is better now. Some people may only like one story, or two stories, or they may think the show is a work in progress and they've seen improvement. There are still big changes which need to be made and sadly may never get made (like the strange idea to continue showcasing Daisy as their young lead heroine when she's never been successful in the part), and there are other huge problems which people have articulated better than I ever could, but I think the show is better now than it has been in a while, even outside of Phillip and Otalia.

I think the big change in the writing for characters like Phillip shows that whoever is in charge of the writing must have undergone some shift over the past few years. The main headwriter is more likely to have strong influence on the story and tone of anyone under him or her. Like at GH. When Guza was gone on the strike, some of their scriptwriters stayed behind, and the quality went up tremendously. Then as soon as he returned, the crap came right back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to mention the fact that JLH has three other headwriters writing alongside her, ones that we know from experience couldn't tell a good story from a hole in the ground. I don't see how any of us can tell how much is JLH and how much is either the actors, the other writers, or just dumb and simple luck. Because it isn't as if the improvement is lifting all parts of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Besides JLH and Kriezman, who are the other headwriters? Lloyd Gold and (?)? I don't remember that much about Gold's writing, was he the one who wrote about Marah's endless declarations of virginity, and Beth/Lorelei?

I agree the show still needs improvement, plenty of improvement, although I think that's true for any soap now, sadly.

I do wish they could do something about Daisy. People are already going to write off any future stories with her because she's just so annoying and has such heavy baggage as a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Christopher Dunn, who was Lloyd Gold's co-headwriter. Yep, Gold/Dunn wrote Beth/Lorelai, Cassie/Alonzo/Richard, most of Marah/Tony,Catalina, Ben Reade's return as a bet-making college playboy, Danny and Michelle's "Mission Impossible" story, and the very beginning of the Tory storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy