Jump to content

December 1-5, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I do think amateurs analyze ratings based on faulty criteria. Are they an indication of how a soap is entertaining viewers? Yes. Are they a measure of whether the soap is good or bad? Not as clear.

I agree that OLTL is good right now, and the performances are very good as well. Unfortunately, it's not very balanced at the moment. While I can watch the Marty hour and recognize the quality, I still don't care about the story and there's not enough play for stories I am more interested in to keep me engaged. As rangethatrover said in another post (and I paraphrase), if you hate the Todd and Marty story, you will hate OLTL right now. There is no right or wrong, there is only entertainment or lack thereof.

The trends disturb me because I want OLTL to be successful, and I recognize that this (the current myopic focus on SH/Marty) too shall pass. So I am just biding my time until it does, in hopes that Ron's next stories will display the same considered development and will hopefully involve characters I care more about. In the meantime, I suspect that the overindulgence of viewers who like the Marty story is responsible for the moderate downward trends, because of course, like everyone else, I do not think I am alone in not being very entertained by this particular story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But the Todd/Marty story is not the only story that is getting airtime and I am enjoying. Yes it is dominating but it is not the be all and end all of OLTL right now.

I loved the funeral and have loved Starr and Marcie dealing with their grief. I loved Andrew counseling Starr.

The Dorian stuff with Starr and Blair has been good.

The Vickie/Todd scene was well worth the years of seeing Vickie be blinded by her love for Todd. That scene was years in the making.

The Vickie/Starr scene was wonderful and echoed so much of the history with Vickie and her Dad. Vickie was the best person ever to give Starr advice about wanting to hate her Dad.

I have loved the little focuses on Michael & Marcie trying to come together and to be there for one another.

Cole and Starr dealing with their grief.

And I personally have loved Jessica's struggles. The talks with the psychiatrist have been interesting and not as bad as I thought they would be.

I am missing some characters like John and Natalia and Rex and Gigi - but both couples have gotten lots of coverage at other times in the year - so I like them being given a rest for awhile.

This is the way soaps used to be too. Certain stories would come to light and those characters would be featured heavily for a few months and then go to the backburner for awhile. It was hardly ever a time in the old soap formual where a character or characters stayed front burner for the whole year. So I don't mind this forumula at all.

To me the Todd/Marty part of this story is just one little part of it. The family drama is the heart of the story for me. And that is the part I am loving. It has really put the Lord/Cramer families front and center and tied several stories together. I like that a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, because ratings are good indicator of that aren't they? I mean with GH so sitting comfortably in the ratings it's a good indicator that that show doesn't offend women or write their female characters badly.

Dena is gonna become the Bob Guza of DAYS, Corday is simply gonna keep her around because the ratings are good.

It is how soaps used to be. Almost everyone got their share of a story this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B probably got its boost on Friday from the death of Phoebe Forrester, which was leaked by the show weeks in advance in the TV Guide soap column. People knew the death was on Friday, and some of that momentum will probably carry over into the following week because that story was basically the only thing airing this past week. The death of a legacy character with ties to the show's core players will do that. Like others in the thread, I'm enjoying what I'm seeing around that story, and maybe others are, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL Adam if you don't like what I say, then please don't bother posting to me, I don't like AMC as it is in the state it's in now. For some reason that bothers you. I'm not some drone who thinks the show is perfect no matter how much hackiness it endures ;)

I really honestly don't hate AMC persay, just what Frons has done to it. He keeps hiring hacks who don't do anything but drive the show into the ground.

Annie's storyline became overkill. Plus everything she did was to get Ryan back? Ooookay :mellow:

LOL if you say so, I haven't seen much improvement. Pratt isn't much better than B&E. He's all about plot points the same way they were. He's been there almost 4 months and he has YET to get the characters. He's already getting 1.9/2.0, it took B&E months to even get those types of ratings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think B&B benefits when we have "legacy" characters on the screen period. (Although I'm not sure about Phoebe being legacy, lol). IMO, viewers of Y&R and B&B like the characters that've always been around. Y&R gets away with having lots of new blood by usually being able to introduce it well and usually weave good stories in to existing characters and stories. On B&B, it seems more fast and furious. Take Marcus and Steffy on B&B, although most on here seem to like the pairing, neither was around before a few months ago. So if you're a casual viewer, you'd really wouldn't know much at all about either. But then a match like Donna and Eric, as awful as it might be, you at least know about Eric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve, some people will never be satisfied until Vicki is abducted impregnated by aliens.

It is in the nature of soap writing to resort in retelling some of the same storylines. I guess the only difference in some cases are the characters and/or how it plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy