Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Even through the campaign Trump replaced Secret Service with his own security team. An explanation I saw was that he can make private security sign non-disclosure agreements but Secret Service works for the Treasury department so they have others to report to. Secret Service can actually override the president for his own safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

West Virginia! I'm right next door in Maryland. I feel for you guys. I love WV--one of the most beautiful states in the country (Almost Heaven, indeed, John Denver) to drive in (as long as you're careful going around the curves), and yet also Trump's best performing state. SMH.

 

That said, it's cool that you guys still have a Democratic Governor--Jim Justice, one of the few newly elected Democrats in any office last fall--which means there's still some veto power (then again, Earl Ray Tomblin was a Democrat too, and Right to Work was STILL passed last year under his tenure, in a state that has historically been VERY union-friendly. So I dunno.).

 

To take this to state politics for a second, I'm VERY curious as to what's going to happen in MD next year in our Governor's race--being a traditionally Democratic state, there are going to be a LOT of people running in the primary, but Larry Hogan is popular in many circles, too (and Democrats in Maryland are helped by having both Baltimore and the DC suburbs--Western Maryland--where I went to college--Southern Maryland--where I grew up and live, right now, anyway--and the Eastern Shore are MUCH more Republican), and I worry about Democrats beating each other in that primary too much. That is the LAST thing we need here. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by MissLlanviewPA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dems launch 'unprecedented early' effort to capture GOP districts

 

So at least there's that.

 

 

With news of all these personnel leaving/changes, this article in which management experts rated Trump's management style takes on a strange resonance.

 

Case Study in Chaos: How Management Experts Grade a Trump White House

 

Some interesting quotes from the article:

 

" The unanimous verdict: Thus far, the Trump administration is a textbook case of how not to run a complex organization like the executive branch. "

 

and of his executive actions  “are so far from any responsible management approach” 

 

“Of course, this isn’t new,” he told me. “His campaign also violated every prudent management principle. Everyone including our friends on Wall Street somehow believed that once he was president he’d change. I don’t understand that logic.”

“If you thought immigration was bad, just wait for health care,” Mr. Pfeffer warned.

 

“I don’t really know what’s going on in the White House, so I don’t feel comfortable commenting on that specifically. But I can say in general that in organizational settings, less chaos is a good thing.”

 

If this were the private sector, “someone would be fired,” 

 

“No good business makes decisions that are based on falsehoods,” he said. “My sense is that Trump takes no one’s counsel but his own. That’s bad management, period.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan. BTW, does anybody have any new speculation on what Martin's secret will be? Brandon is hinting nobody is guessing it. Initially I thought it would be something where he was drunk and killed somebody or something like that but now I'm feeling like maybe it wasn't completely his fault. I don't get the vibe they're going to take him in a dark direction anymore.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I don't think some of Samantha's hairstyles have worked with the ponytails and bows making her look like an older adult wearing a 10-year-old hairstyle.    Bows work on Kat much better for Kat's age and personal style. We've known since the start that Eva was a hairstylist before she began working for Nicole.  I like that they brought that back, with Ted arranging for her to work at a high-end salon.  Yesterday's scene with Martin bringing Eva over for pizza with his family, and then Eva doing hairstyles for Samantha worked (for me). I did think that the new hairstyle that Eva created for Samantha was less "little girl" and somehow even though more mature, it made the actress Najah look less aged. Can't quite explain it, but she looks better now.
    • That backdoor pilot may have failed, yet one year later "Empty Nest" became a reality anyway, so it wasn't a complete waste of time. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      The show was completely revamped of course, but still....
    • Honestly, either 6-7 and 10-11 would've worked better. But maybe they wanted actors who wouldn't be held to child labour laws and needed them to be able to act, especially if they're (eventually?) going to go with their bio mama showing up (June??). 
    • I thought it interesting that in the Claybon/Manning youtube with Michael Fairman, Brandon Claybon said Samantha and Tyrell were initially supposed to be 6 and 7, but aged up for technical reasons, first aged up to 10 or 11, and then finally to 16 and 17.  (Not sure what "technical reasons" means but that's what he said.) Claybon didn't mention when this decision was made to change the ages of the children. No mention of when this happened during the process of casting/writing/preparation. Just speculating: I wonder if Najah Jackson and Jaden Lucas Miller were cast later than other recurring actors due to this change? - so maybe that's how they selected Ms. Jackson? 
    • Damn, there was a tiny pre-emption where I'm from and I missed the Kat/Nicole scene, according to recaps.
    • That Kristina caused the accident.
    • I'm unclear:  What specifically does Lucky know about Elizabeth's accident and Kristina? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy