Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 Biden's top line is rumored to be 2.0 T which is closer to Manchin and the Republicans top line of 1.5 T than 3.5 T. Much of the narrative has been about how much is costs (which is always the case when it comes to Democratic sponsored bills) than what is actually in it or what will be left in it when it passes. More from AOC. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The topline quoted for Biden was actually 1.8 to 2.3, which you'd know if you weren't deliberately cherrypicking, and which is about where this bill was always going to end up anyway - probably between 2 and 2.5.

But I can always count on you to show up and drag a Democratic victory and insist it doesn't count because the number went down at all. I did tell you you would do exactly this when it got close to passing, didn't I? Shall I quote my post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes you can dig up that post, my post on what I said in context of passing bills  too or any post for that matter. You can decide then if I'm a right winger like Joe Rogan or a Young Turk like you said I was. I'm my own my man and I march by the beat of my own drum. 

I already heard about 1.8T between and 2.3 T that quoted by Biden but the 2.0 T is being floated out there too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This exact bill, is what it was in reference to. You are already setting yourself up to claim it's a failure when it passes if it's below 3.5, when any sane person knew it would be below 3.5. By determining that in advance as your condition for victory you never have to admit you're wrong (a record I have already enumerated at length, but we've been over that).

It's okay if you wanted Bernie. It's not okay to tear down any Democratic achievement because you've got sour grapes. Bernie is behind this bill, BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nice try but I didn't vote for Bernie and that's on record too and you should already know that since you see and know it all.  I also see you are burying the lead (you have a tendency do that) and making what I said all price of the bill when that isn't the case. You have already proven you don't care what's in these bills and long as they pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mm, that's not true in the slightest, but I did tell you months ago that you would automatically dismiss this bill's passage if it ever went below 3.5 (actually, you used to insist it be 6 trillion in order to count). And that's exactly what you're doing, preemptively, because all you ever do is concern troll about Democrats. Every time you've been wrong you've moved the goalposts. You don't care what's in the bill. That's okay though, we'll educate you in the coming days anyway. Enjoy!

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are having a long fall from grace, as they were  mad that few of the Democrats they backed in 2020 were doing what they wanted. I imagine they will go begging the GOP for support, even if it means having little voice and going along with election fraud hysteria and authoritarianism, with zero policy beyond  the inevitable tax cuts for the rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • From a sort of the charts, here's the quick look at things:   1973-1979 PREEMPTIONS/SPECIAL AIRINGS:   All My Children 1/22/73-1/26/73 All My Children Preempted Wed- Homage to President Lyndon B. Johnson        5/14/73-5/18/73 All My Children Monday episode- 1-125PM (25 minutes)        10/29/73-11/2/73 All My Children Thursday episode-1:05PM (25 minutes)        11/19/73-11/23/73 All My Children Preempted Thursday- NCAA Football       5/6/74-5/10/74 All My Children Preempted Thursday- House Judiciary Hearing 5/27/74-5/31/74 All My Children Wednesday episode- 1:05PM (25 minutes)            8/19/74-8/23/74 All My Children Monday episode- 1:10PM (20 minutes)    8/26/74-8/30/74 All My Children Wed ep- 3:01PM (29mins)         11/25/74-11/29/74 All My Children Preempted Friday- NCAA Football        1/13/75-1/17/75 All My Children Preempted Wednesday- State of the Union Address      6/30/75-7/4/75 All My Children Special time airings all week (1230-130PM)        11/24/75-11/28/75 All My Children Preempted Thursday- Tom & Jerry/Grape Ape Show    12/29/75-1/2/76 All My Children Monday special airing: 1230-130PM           8/16/76-8/20/76 All My Children Preempted Thursday- ABC Special Report        11/22/76-11/26/76 All My Children Preempted Thursday- Tom & Jerry       1/17/77-1/21/77 All My Children Preempted Thursday- Pres. Inauguration        11/21/77-11/25/77 All My Children Preempted Thursday- Scooby III        8/7/78-8/11/78 All My Children Preempted Wednesday-Pope Paul VI Report        9/4/78-9/8/78 All My Children Tuesday episode-1-127 & 141-2PM (46 minutes)        10/16/78-10/20/78 All My Children Monday episode-1-119 & 124-143PM (37 minutes)        11/6/78-11/10/78 All My Children Thursday special airing-1:32-2:30PM (58 minutes)     11/20/78-11/24/78 All My Children Preempted Friday- NCAA Football        9/3/79-9/7/79 All My Children Monday episode (108 affiliates; breakout, 7.1/20 not counted in ratings)          10/1/79-10/5/79 All My Children Tuesday episode- 1:20PM (40 minutes)      11/19/79-11/23/79 All My Children Preempted Friday- NCAA Football       
    • I do agree that I wish there was more gay representation in terms of singles. I also had hoped we'd get a Black couple since it was a Black soap and I don't know that we've ever seen that on a US soap.  With that said, it's still early days so I can imagine we'll get that at some point. I am impressed they launched with as much LGBT representation considering how US soaps can be.
    • Thank you. I know we're all supposed to see that BTG is progressive when it comes to queer characters, but it's telling that they won't commit to showcasing gay or bi males who are single and looking. That relationship couldn't be any more traditional. Will we ever get a bedroom scene with Smitty and Martin? I have my doubts.
    • This is a pretty huge thing IMO, but I guess we will see what happens? Can't get any worse then already. 
    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy