Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6818

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 Aunt Lindsey, virulent anti-masker, now has COVID, and was recently on media darling Manchin's "houseboat," exposing him along with other "bipartisan" Democrats. 

If this does not teach them that Republicans will bring them only but illness and pain, then nothing will.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Once he went out there trying to undermine public trust in James' investigation last week you knew what was coming. 

Now we'll see if he resigns or if this drags on. 

Good for her, not letting him intimidate her the way he has so many others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Years ago, when James was elected, I said that James doesn't mess around. She is an example of "unbought and unbossed".

All those GOPers and right-wingers ought not to be crowing about Gov. Cuomo finally getting some measure of comeuppance. Surely, they must know that Trump is likely next in the queue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ Associated Press has an article delving deeper into why she won

I personally don't think it takes much to understand. Support the sitting President of the party you were apart of, and you will see wins from that party. Progressives complaining and insulting Biden while they run for election makes no sense to me.  You can still want to see more progress, while not nuking the sitting President and the Democratic base. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Turner has said she lost because of  "evil money" (AKA Jewish money), and her new crusade will be to make sure it doesn't happen to other people. In other words, she will go back to grifting now that her terrible campaign (so terrible she would not even say whether she voted for Biden) to a seat she and the other dead end leftists felt entitled to failed. 

Turner has only won a single election in her whole career. She was then appointed to her state senate seat, and has failed everywhere else. She helped Bernie to lose twice, the last time by a bigger margin than many anticipated, failed to get her cash grab People's Party grift with other scumbags like Ryan Knight anywhere, and was so bad at keeping the left in line she ended the race being jeered by Jimmy Dore and his cultists. 

Yet so much of the online media still give all the time and money in the world to these nihilistic and completely shameless losers, even when they, like Nina Turner, take off to go be a lobbyist and have a corporate-backed podcast in-between "populist" crusades. 

It just goes around and around and around.

I have seen some of her sycophants praising her for not kissing up to Biden, but they don't seem to have much to say for why she chose to run as a Democrat in this primary if she is so principled. She tried to have it both ways, and she failed, because she is a shitty politician and has a terrible read on the public, in her own district and in the country at large. 

Of course she, and all the other pieces of [!@#$%^&*] like David Sirota, will just go on blaming mean, mean James Clyburn.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Beltway loves to cast the most unelectable people like Turner as 'the new progressive voices' even when they know better, because it is a better sub-narrative for them to be able to pivot back to Dems in Disarray. (Hence why grinning clown Brian Stelter hosts a CNN panel of 'the new progressives' - made up of pro-life Liz Bruenig, walking midlife crisis Dave Weigel and Briahna Joy Gray.) Nina Turner is not the face of progressive Democrats or the left, but DC wants her to be because it fits their preferred arc.

The story of progressivism and progressive voters in the country, as well as in the party, most of whom are center-left, is much more nuanced and much more complex than "can one grifter (Turner) who burned literally every bridge known to man get nominated by disinterested Democrats?" It's much less rewarding to the center-right Beltway to look at, say, the eviction moratorium activism which helped break a logjam with bureaucracy in the WH, or the House fight re: the reconciliation package or voting rights. Because the truth is the Beltway is not happy when progressives in office win fights. Or take office at all.

And yes, I think some of those same folks who've been doing good lately re: the above were very stupid to stump for Turner. Her background is not that old. But anyway - good riddance. Maybe guys like Will Stancil will have a rage embolism.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nina Turner ran one of one of the worst campaigns I‘ve ever seen in my life. She went into the race with a ton of name recognition and plenty of outside money. 

She started out trying to pass herself off as a sane, normal Democrat in TV ads but she couldn’t keep her crazy in check. Then came trash-talking Clyburn. Then came the Black clergy calling her out. Then came the ramped-up anti-Semitism. Then she flip-flopped and decided to lean into running AGAINST the Democratic party by bringing AOC and the whole Bernie circus to town. Look at her ads at the beginning of the race then look at her concession speech. At the end she was just a wild-eyed, spittle flecked, conspiracy-theorist blaming the Jews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy