Jump to content

Hollyoaks: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

That is scandalous! I guess this all stems from the rumors she was upset that Kent Riley was fired. If she was causing trouble I guess I can see why they wrote her out quickly, but it's a shame. Considering that Marquess let her interview him in that welcome interview he did for the HO site, they may have had good plans for her if she'd stayed.

What do you think of the show lately? Do you like the Sharpes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yeah, it was Cheryl, not Michaela. Carl, you getting old or something? LoL

So, everyone's with me, that the reason Rhys was actually pissed off to find his mom with Darren was because he was seething with jealousy, right?

RARREN' to go! 2010!

Edited by Amello
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He does have a bit of Guy about him, and someone else I'm blanking on. Whenever I hear the name Bart I think of Bart Simpson.

So I guess you're happy to see Rae gone then? I thought the exit with Newt was kind of bittersweet, although I am not sure about moving away with your drug addict mother who you have only been reunited with for about two days, half of which she spent MIA. How does she know she even got a job? I also kind of wonder why they didn't just have Newt and Rae leave together instead of separately but the last scene with the book he made for her was sweet. Is it wrong to say I was kind of hoping she'd keel over after he left?

The scene where Suzanne told Neville about Darren had a whole lotta bad acting.

Odd that Tony is dumping Cindy so quickly and was going to run away with Gabby Sharpe after about three days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the same about Bart. I hope the actor is strong enough to overcome his unfortunate name.

Poor Cindy. I did laugh though of seeing her in that apron. All I could think of is, look who's pregnant!

Are you sure Rae is gone for good? Her exit hasn't been announced, has it? I just don't want to celebrate until we could be completely sure.

On the other hand, even though Rae brought down Newt immensely, I am still going to miss Nico a hell of a lot. He was a tremendous actor and one of the best criers I have ever seen. I hope he goes on to big things.

So I'm guessing Suzanne and Neville will leave town to work on their marriage? Can't get rid of them fast enough. I wonder where Rhys is going to live when they sell The Dog. I hear Darren's flat has a bedroom free? :)

Oh and I love the music Hollyoaks uses. I was happily surprised to hear The xx in the background when Newt drove away.

Edited by Amello
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had assumed she was also going because of the part about her nursing her grandmother. Most of that can't be oncamera, unless they're going to have her grandmother with Ricky's father and Rae and Ricky become like Kay from Tracey Ullmann Show/Tracey Takes On when she found a boyfriend who also had to care for his mother.

I wasn't a big fan of the emo pouting routine but I will miss Nico's chemistry with his family. He also had some potential with Lauren, early on, although they worked best as friends. I kind of like that they got rid of the goth look, as it made him look better and that whole thing often seemed poserish to me.

Rhys living with Darren would be great ^_^

Supposedly

I'm not sure if you were a fan of hers but supposedly Hayley Ramsey is also returning for a time.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was. Josh caused a car crash which broke India's arm or something. This was airing around the time Marquess was announced as the new producer and people were speculating this was all his doing and everyone in the car with Josh would die. :lol:

Have you heard the rumor that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy