Jump to content

Hollyoaks: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

despite Niall`s story being slow,the payoff and the climax in the church was one of Hollyoak`s best weeks and episodes in the soap. The explosion was fantastic and the aftermath which crept into Hollyoaks Later was just as chilling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

oh well you learn something new every day.

There is something about Hollyoaks villians which i love. I didn`t like Warren because he was always in a foul mood and never thought of a plan. He just sort of punched and kicked to get what he want.

I liked Scott Anderson and wished he would make a comeback. although Hollyoaks does need some more comedic and light hearted stories. I think Bombhead should return and him & Lee can be the comedic duo we all remembered and loved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was Abby Davies. Zara was the little sister of the Morgan family, she was a very shrill, liberal girl. She and Lee had a love/hate bond for a long time.

I mostly remember her for the hilarious episode at St. Patrick's Day 2005 where they had her dress up as a Kylie impersonator when the Kylie impersonator they hired didn't show up. The girl finally did show up and she and Zara got into a catfight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since they're bringing Lee back that should mean they're willing to bring others in for nostalgia, and for future stories.

I think they should bring in someone who was in the early days of the show; they could also interact with Tony (wasn't he involved with a lot of women back then).

I also wonder if they could recast Cindy's sister Jude. She was a big bitch on the show in her era.

There's also Steph's sister Debbie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For Lee Hunter i would suggest either Zara Morgan with a child possibly or Bombhead and have them do comedic stuff and as suggested before,have Lee & Camel romance possibly.

As for Tony, i would suggest maybe Ruth to return or maybe Lucy Benson. or Mandy could return full time.

Jude Cunningham? Unsure on that. I hear she was a good character and i guess another Cunningham is needed seeing as they are the first family on Hollyoaks.

Dunno about Debbie. Jack,Frankie,Steph,Tom & Darren are ok right now. I don`t see another one fitting in maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

well i can tell that Marquess is already in despite LA is still credited.

As for the identity of the killer,i am interested to see where they go next with this. I am forming ideas of what the aftermath will shape up to be.

Never the less i would have picked someone else to be the killer.

As for The Murder Mystery stuff,i found that to be kind of fun despite the mediocre acting. The only reason i like India is because she is attractive end of.

I am also thinking about ways how Clare Devine could return to the show. She is willing to return Full time so i am wondering if there are any storylines that could lure her back to the show.

I would also put The Osbourne/Dean Family back in The Dog and have someone new run The Loft. I`m thinking Clare if she ever returns or one of the new families. Maybe Mercedes & Malachy would be interesting running it together.

I would also introduce a new villian. I know there is one coming in for Cheryl but someone that isn`t connectd. Maybe one of the new students like Will Hackett.i liked him.

Also - Make Oaks more light hearted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy