Jump to content

June 9-13, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

MONDAY, JUNE 9

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 3.6/5,015,000 (-44,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.7/3,776,000 (+31,000)

3.(5) ATWT: Monday: 2.1/3,018,000 (+322,000)

4.(3) GH: Monday: 2.2/2,891,000 (-114,000)

5.(4) OLTL: Monday: 2.1/2,774,000 (-5,000)

6.(8) DAYS: Monday: 2.1/2,748,000 (+997,000)

7.(6) AMC: Monday: 2.0/2,576,000 (+94,000)

8.(7) GL: Monday: 1.7/2,422,000 (+213,000)

TUESDAY, JUNE 10

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.6/5,077,000 (+62,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.7/3,643,000 (-133,000)

3.(7) AMC: Tuesday: 2.1/2,754,000 (+178,000)

4.(4) GH: Tuesday: 2.1/2,732,000 (-159,000)

5.(6) DAYS: Tuesday: 1.9/2,668,000 (-80,000)

6.(5) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,653,000 (-121,000)

7.(3) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.0/2,618,000 (-400,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 1.6/2,411,000 (-11,000)

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.5/4,681,000 (-396,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.6/3,613,000 (-30,000)

3.(4) GH: Wednesday: 2.2/2,914,000 (+182,000)

4.(5) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,910,000 (+242,000)

5.(6) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.1/2,697,000 (+44,000)

6.(7) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.9/2,597,000 (-21,000)

7.(3) AMC: Wednesday: 2.0/2,508,000 (-246,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.7/2,331,000 (-80,000)

THURSDAY, JUNE 12

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.3/4,767,000 (+86,000

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.4/3,496,000 (-117,000)

3.(3) GH: Thursday: 2.1/2,604,000 (-310,000)

4.(6) ATWT: Thursday: 1.8/2,430,000 (-167,000

5.(5) OLTL: Thursday: 2.0/2,401,000 (-296,000)

6.(4) DAYS: Thursday: 1.8/2,345,000 (-565,000)

7.(7) AMC: Thursday: 1.9/2,330,000 (-178,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.4/2,035,000 (-296,000)

FRIDAY, JUNE 13

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.3/4,380,000 (-387,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.4/3,442,000 (-54,000)

3.(3) GH: Friday: 2.2/2,814,000 (+210,000)

4.(5) OLTL: Friday: 2.1/2,742,000 (+341,000)

5.(7) AMC: Friday: 2.0/2,514,000 (+184,000)

6.(4) ATWT: Friday: 1.7/2,281,000 (-149,000)

7.(8) GL: Friday: 1.6/2,174,000 (+139,000)

8.(6) DAYS: Friday: 1.6/2,097,000 (-248,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

IMHO, Hogan did destroy ATWT. I don't appreciate how he made Barbara a head case, or Craig unredeemable. He was also, to my knowledge, the first HW to write wacky sci-fi crap into the show. Y&R... you're next!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sylph is definitely right.... Y&R fans (including me) are so depressed that they'd take ANYTHING and ANYONE (besides Latham) just to get Y&R out of the mess that it is in. It's a shame to see the #1 soap falling so low. I am sure that we'll NEVER see Y&R reaching 4.0 again. Never.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only except in not-so-recent memory, I think, was GH. That DID pull itself up, for a few years (early 1980s), before rejoining the general decline trajectory. Maybe it is Thom Racina and not Hogan Sheffer who will save the show.

Also, I didn't realize this Lisa Seidman had such LML ties. Maybe she will "save" Y&R like LML did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It may not be true. I haven't seen it referenced elsewhere. Though it really is cool...tying that character to that legacy character.... who has ties with... well...it would be cool if true.

Now, if only OLTL ratings would follow with this upsurge in cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right about Bloom. She doesn't get nearly the criticism that Frons at ABC gets, and she's responsible in large measure for the pitiful state of the CBS daypart. In the day when Lucy Johnson was in charge of the CBS daypart, she took a hands off approach, if she trusted the writer(s) heading her network's soaps. Bill Bell often commented on this, and he was grateful not to have network suits butting into the day-to-day. Barbara Bloom's approach is just the opposite. She micro-manages everything, or tries to. Her biggest mistake, however, is bringing her friend Lynn Marie Latham to Y&R. Bloom never understood Y&R appeal. She never understood what a different soap it was from all the rest. And because she didn't, she and Latham "overhauled" a show that didn't need overhauling. Tweaking a bit, perhaps. But gutting a show creatively like was done to Y&R, I think, is one of the biggest blunders in the history of daytime programming. Consider all the talent that is no longer at Y&R: ED SCOTT, KATHRYN FOSTER, NOEL MAXUM, KAY ALDEN, JACK SMITH, JIM HOUGHTON, SALLY SUSSMAN, JANICE FERRI ESSER, JOSHUA MCCAFFREY, REX M. BEST, MICHAEL MINNIS, SARA BIBEL, TRENT JONES, JERRY BIRN. These people were the heart and soul of Y&R for many, many years. All are gone now, probably never to return. As hard as Maria Bell may be trying to return the show to its former roots, she can't do it without the people who made Y&R the success it was (along with the late great Bill Bell, of course). For that reason alone, Bloom should be axed now, especially since her blunder has impacted the entire CBS soap lineup. As Y&R goes, so goes the lineup. I'm beginning to think the show will never recover, even if they brought back the old team that made the show so poupular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show is beyond mind-numbing. The pairings don't work. There are so few characters to care about any longer. Everyone "sounds" the same. The soap is generic. It's lost its voice. It's lost its soul. It's lost its way. Just like the other CBS soaps. And soaps in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soaps don't have time for headwriters to "find their groove." If a headwriter is hired by a show, then that headwriter should be prepared to hit the ground running. Are Y&R fans supposed to wait months for Hogan to learn Y&R and "find his groove?" This show is sinking fast. Instead, why not bring on a new headwriter who has history with the show, who understands Y&R's uniqueness, who doesn't need a learning curve. There are any number of writers who left Y&R or who got purged, thanks to LML, who could step start turning things around from day one. Or better still, put together a headwriting team like GL once did (with Curlee, Demorest, Reilly, Brodericlk) using former Y&R writers who work well together, but who have differing strengths. Come up with an interesting configuration of writing talent as a headwriting team, and let them do their thing. Also, bring in a strong EP to execute the writers' vision. Ed Scott is the logical choice, if available. But what about John Conboy? He has a history with the show. Maybe he's available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy