Jump to content

Sara A. Bibel's Blog


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Ah Mark, still trying to keep things positive but I kind of agree with Slyph on this one. If you had a really talented writer friend who said "I just got a job on a soap," would you say "Great! You'll have such an impact on the genre!" or "Great! Now you can pay your bills while you look for something better."

I hate seeing talent wasted and daytime has been wasting it in spades in front of and behind the camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree and don't... It seems that there are mroe and more probs with network primetime shows too (look at all the showrunner turnaround over at ABC--even on a relative hit like Bros and Sis--and I know you personally weren't a fan--Baitz felt forced off the show by ABC). But yeah the sitaution prob would give her more chances than daytime. Maybe Weiner should take her on at Mad Men :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Precisely. It's an amazing interview, totally spot on.

That's why I said she should flee and never come back. If she returns to daytime, it may be the total end of her career. Given that once in soaps for a long time, you will always be seen as a niche writer or a some sort of centaur-esque combo of primetime/daytime writer (like many of those people who came on with Lynn Latham on Y&R).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a job as hard as TV writing in which to become employed, I scarcely see how someone could reject the offer of a lucrative position in daytime...especially if other doors weren't answering one's knock.

That said, I actually think (predicting the end of daytime US soaps in 2016...with most dying between 2010-2012) having experience on a daytime soap will be quite useful in the post-soap universe.

It is kind of like expert plaster work. As new technology comes (drywall), the old skill is lost. Soon, you have fewer and fewer people who can do the plaster work. And then one day, you need extensive plaster work.

Though I think daytime is dying, I don't think the serial drama is anywhere near dead. I think that expert serial writing takes unique skills that are hard to cultivate and maintain (the Kring article you are all referencing; Lost Season 2, slumps in later seasons of ER or Six Feet Under, etc.). I could almost seek the daytime skills (for volume and for structure) as being highly prized at some future time when someone seeks to revive the serial in a form that is closer to the current format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just beautifully done. I could name some minor quibbles, but I won't, because what DAYS gave us today was golden. That was soap opera at its finest, paying homage to history and legacy and actors and the audience. This is why we love soaps.
    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of a tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows or SNL characters.  OT - but they have yet to maximize that platform.
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
    • Amanda Setton and Rena Sofer was once again really good in today's episode.  As a Lucky/Liz fan, I didn't like their scenes either.  And they are nowhere near a proposal because they haven't been given a real story.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy