Jump to content

GL: Kim Zimmer is Mad!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Apr 20 2008, 05:20 PM)
I don't think Kim Zimmer looks bad at all. GL styles everyone so poorly that they almost look homeless. Whenever we see her at the Emmys she looks great. GL has no glamour anymore and if you don't look perfect (Crystal Chappell, Marcy Rylan) you'll look like crap with the horrible close ups and bad lighting.

I don't think she looks bad either. Sure she doesn't look as great as some other actresses, but she doesn't look bad by any means at all. GL doesn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

As much as I love KZ, I wouldn't put her anywhere near the acting category of Susan Flannery. KZ's camp and OTT theatrics, all the way. She's the master of the teary choke, the sobbing histrionics. And none of that is BAD, that's a perfectly valid form of acting, especially on a soap. She grabs the emotions and amps them up to 11.

But Flannery? She's an ACTRESS. And I mean that in the most flattering way possible. She can play humor, pathos, camp, and straight-up drama. She's got a depth of skill that KZ never really approached, but again I think that's okay. She's also been doing this job for a lot longer than Kim, so it's not unheard of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Apr 21 2008, 12:32 AM)
http://www.soaps.com/guidinglight/board/59712/

According to that post, Zimmer has been fired. Very interesting that people in this thread said due to her looks she has no future. Strangely enough, the most shallow soap on air (GH) is looking at her, if the rumor is true.

Hmmm, I don't know if GL would fire its biggest actress (no pun intended) over a somewhat negative interview about the state of the show. Sounds phoney to me, especially the GH part. Her family is on the East coast. I don't see her relocating to LA for GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No way in hell GH would hire her.

I think GL was at its best when she wasn't there, but as she is now, I think it would be a mistake to lose her. Yes, I agree she's overweight, crass, etc., and until recently I always found her gross and intolerable. But one of the few boons to Wheeler/Kreizman's work, IMO, is that the writing seems to understand and acknowledge (even if Zimmer doesn't) that Reva is an aging old sexpot who thinks she's hotter than she is, or maybe she doesn't, but she still has some spark. The way I see it, they now write Reva as though she is old and heavy and refuses to hide it, or to hide the fact that she's still a sexual being and proud of it, despite her wrinkles and sags. So to see an honest character like that on American daytime is refreshing to me. I find that character far preferable to the Reva of 2000 or '98, who was blowdried, teased, sold to us as a "sex goddess" but already, at that time, looked like refried, overtanned leathery [!@#$%^&*]. (Honestly, who believed Richard Winslow took her to be his island queen?) This older woman who just doesn't give a [!@#$%^&*] and admits she's easy is more interesting to me than Reva, domestic goddess and centerpiece of Springfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not buying the "scoop" that Kim Zimmer has been fired until it is confirmed. If it is true, there is absolutely no way on this earth that rumor about GH being interested in her is true. That show would never hire her. These are the people wouldn't give Genie Francis a contract because she put on less weight that Kim Zimmer has and they won't give their own veteran actors (other than Luke and by extension Tracy) more than a second of airtime.

GL can still tell interesting stories around Reva even if she isn't a sexpot any more. She is still a woman who has family and a love in Josh. It is too bad that the show has lost its substance. If the writing was good, the terrible production could be ignored, but as things stand, all I see is washout looking actors, jumpy camera work and outdoor scenes where everything looks a shade of beige.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It could very well be that it is KZ who doesn't want Reva to mature (read that age).

If she really has been fired as reported, then her tirade makes all the sense in the world. In the world of entertainment, nobody wants to get fired, unless they are in that rare catagory of top money makers and there is always a line of people wanting their services and they don't care. KZ is not in that league (IMO) and I can't see her going over to GH because they already have a roster of mature actresses who they don't use so why add another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can definitely see that airing the same week as The Love Boat colliding with an iceberg and sinking while crossing the North Atlantic on the Titanic anniversary with a “Who lives and dies?!” Promo next to Mr Belvedere being blackmailed over his wanted fugitive status back in the UK

      Please register in order to view this content

        Agree with you both. I am also going assume that while Hotel may had some big numbers the first 2 seasons the demographics weren’t great. Reason I say this is I distinctly remember my parents watching St Elsewhere and/or The Equalizer after Dynasty.    I still don’t get Hotel’s designation as a primetime soap opera either lol. ABC should have aired Paper Dolls in the 10/9 slot on Wednesdays in the fall of 1984 to give that show some more legs.    Obviously ABC was eyeing a double bill night in the same vein as Dallas & Falcon Crest and that might have worked better than leaving Paper Dolls to the wolves in an untested timeslot.
    • I tend to stay out of EP discussions, simply because I rarely know who EPs when. And they all have their good and bad sides. But how are we supposed to judge JFP on anything other than what we see? I didn't know she was a director or a music director. (and unlike say, Chris Goutman, I never saw her credited as anything other than an EP) Specifically in the matter of casting Crampton, she took credit for it (or at Crampton gave her credit for it, whatever) and it was arguably, one of the worst recasts of the '90's (and either as bad or worse than the actress she fired).  She lost two important actresses in '92 and still decided to kill Maureen.  She had a wildly uneven tenure at GL. It's no wonder she's polarizing. But it kind of proves a point--great soap is always a that rare combination of everything clicking at the same time.  And believe me, if I could bring myself to watch her male successors who were responsible for bringing back Reva and allowing her to eat the show again, or hiring Hunt Block, or being too chicken to stand up to stans who and hamstrung the show with boring couples stuck in the same repetitive stories (Vanessa/Matt, Chelle/Danny or Richard/Cassie, take your pick) not to mention San CristoHELL....I'd be more than happy to roast them on open spits. I guess we end up talking about JFP because she's in a period we can nominally agree was one of the last "best" periods of the show.
    • A degree does not make one an expert at their job, it just shows that you can follow directions from a technical standpoint.  It doesn't mean that they're creative. JFP was all about the look of a show without considering that technical beauty can only carry a show so far if there is nothing interesting to go along with it.  Equality means calling out flaws equally in both genders. 
    • NBC or P&G was even fool enough to take a full page ad for two consecutive weeks in TV Guide promoting this horrible storyline.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • JFP has had more defense for her decades of terrible producing than many male producers ever had.
    • It makes sense that she got a degree in directing. I've always said she should have been a director. I think she works better at the technical aspects of the show. I think her problem is the emotion/heart of a show.  She always guts the heart of the show she's on and she makes decisions that stop longtime viewers from watching a show. I don't think it's sexism to call that out especially as I've said similar things about Conboy. I've called out Rauch for much worse. 
    • "Aunt Blanche" first appears toward the end of this episode, about 57 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • You're probably right. They may have just wanted edits of certain characters. Hopefully the rest is around.
    • Of course!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm wondering if there were bits cut from this footage, because to me it seems that may be the case. At 11:23, Laurie tells her psychiatrist that the bar phoned and told her Mark got into a fight and needs to be picked up. It starts to fade to the next scene, you hear some different music begin and get cut off between the static, and where you'd expect to see the aftermath of the fight, we cut back to a later scene of Laurie in bed worrying about what's happening. The credits at the end also show that more than Mark, Laurie and Dr. Northcote should have been in this episode. Another character, Brody, played by Ed Setrakian, is mentioned but not shown. If this is the case, perhaps the original fan who saved this episode has the additional scenes.
    • Anyway… It’s a shame that the video that depicted Leticia’s death was removed from YT.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy