Jump to content

Can B&B Survive without Susan Flannery?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Discuss if B&B Could at all survive if Susan Flannery chooses to retire.

I say that it of course would survive but really loose a lot of wievers, i was just thinking a big shock for the daytime audience where if Susan leaves the show as Stephanie Forrester on B&B, what about if Days tries to steal her back into the show just for a while, to get more wievers, how would everyone react if Susan Flannery would return as Laura Horton on Days?

She would work again with Joseph Mascolo and they worked so greaty and very good on B&B.

What do you all think about all of these?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the show will be just fine, especially if they develop a character to slowly take her place. But La Flannery will be greatly missed. I just hate that she's leaving. :( Still, I think that Bell might be able to entice her to come back once or twice a year for a couple of episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Flannery carries that show, even Bell's not stupid enough to shut her out like the rest of the cast that isn't Ridge, Brooke or Taylor. Sure, the ratings are good enough that it will SURVIVE but I'm pretty sure as soon as Susan's gone the B&B we know and love will be over because Stephanie was such a HUGE part of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

not to mention names or anything but the powers that be over at DAYS camp are too stupid to ask someone with talent like Susan Flannery to come back to days look at all the other former stars that they never approached and why would we need Laura back (she was my fav character back in the day) but seriously there are no hortons around anymore. except evil younger mickey and maggie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think B&B could benefit from not having Stephanie around...if it meant that the show stopped revolving around the same old characters and actually gave characters like Thorne, Felicia, Storm, Jackie and Clarke half decent storylines then I'd be all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the problem with the last decade's approach of pandering to fanbases and overexposing pet characters. Not to strike the "foreign is better" debate because I don't mean that at all but UK/Oz shows don't have the problem when people leave.

Sure there's a dent that needs to be written round but unilaterally when key characters quit, the line is "Nobody is bigger than the show." That's why Brian Frons' homogenising is so damaging. People should be fans of a show for the particular flavour it has, not which couples or actors are on the frontburner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's been the problem for the last 15 years. Frons' thinking on that topic works so well......

One show sits 2nd from the bottom, and the other is buried in last place.

These writers and EPs need to stop pandering to fan bases, and write for the show.

But.......with EPs like Ken Corday running things......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy