Jump to content

January 7-11, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm not going to get upset over these ratings. I want to wait until next week to see how it goes first. This would be the week where everyone returned to work and school, and most of the soaps dropped, so it's not just DAYS. That's one positive way to think of it.

This was just as good as last week, if not better for me. You had John and Marlena's reunion, Belle and Claire's abduction, the stand-off on the pier, etc. It was action, non-stop. Hopefully, the ratings will go up next week.

DAYS deserves better numbers. But like others have said, TPTB may have just waited too long to make these changes, that have iimproved the show greatly, but unfortunately, no one's here to watch them. Just look at OLTL. That show is on fire right now, and it's worse than DAYS, number wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure this is such a bad thing. They clearly got a rise last week, because people were home for the holidays. It's going to take awhile for the ratings to move up more; if the ratings go DOWN during Feb sweeps, then there is trouble. And, i wouldn't pay attention to what people say on soapcity; no one couple will ever bring ratings up, and what people want on a soap message board, is completely different from the average soap fan wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why people are surprised with the drop in ratings for Days or any other show. It was a hoiday week, people were home from work and watching TV. Now they are back to work and not at home during the day. And??? It's nothing to be surprised or to worry about. Geesh.

Jen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, the ratings are bad. But I expected them to be. Next week the soaps should rebound. MLK week ratings are usually high ones. I still can't believe GH is #3. The show is so bad right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I think Days and other soaps will recover next week. Then there is also the MLK holiday coming up too, which is always a good day for all.

The good thing for Days is, like others have pointed out, they still are much better in total viewers then they were a month ago and the demos are stronger as well. plus, the dailies aren't lower then a 2.1, which is nice considering where they were in the summer. It took a few months for Days to bottom out at 1.8 so it's going to take a bit to get back viewers. They are already better off in many regards and, like others said, next week is a bit more critical as people will be settled in and all so hopefully we see better then. I get the sense we will.

Congrats to OLTL though. Well deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS

Monday: 2.2/2,876,000

Tuesday: 2.1/2,735,000

Wednesday: 2.1/2,727,000

Thursday: 2.1/2,845,000

Friday: 2.2/3,009,000

GH

Monday: 2.4/3,175,000

Tuesday: 2.3/2,827,000

Wednesday: 2.4/3,167,000

Thursday: 2.4/3,162,000

Friday: 2.2/2,862,000

Compare

Monday:It's okay

Tuesday:It okay to

Wednesday:It's okay

Thursday:

DAYS

Thursday: 2.1/2,845,000

GH

Tuesday: 2.3/2,827,000

They need on Thursday a 2.3

Friday:They need Friday to 2.3

So The rating for Days has to be 2.2+2.1+2.1+2.3+2.3=2.2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Top 10 Most Viewed Episodes of 2007. I didn't keep the list for Y&R, B&B or PASN, so...

GH

2.(3) GH: Wednesday, 2/14: 3.4/4,625,000

3.(2) GH: Tuesday, 2/13: 3.3/4,291,000

2.(3) GH: Monday, 2/12: 3.3/4,263,000

4.(4) GH: Monday, 1/15: 3.3/4,261,000

2.(3) GH: Monday, 2/19: 3.3/4,248,000

3.(3) GH: Friday, 2/9: 3.1/4,238,000

2.(2) GH: Monday, 2/26: 3.2/4,220,000

3.(3) GH: Monday, 2/5: 3.3/4,203,000

2.(2) GH: Tuesday, 2/20: 3.1/4,180,000

2.(3) GH: Thursday, 2/1: 3.1/4,098,000

ATWT

5.(6) ATWT: Tuesday, 2/13: 3.0/3,798,000

4.(7) ATWT: Monday, 1/22: 2.8/3,749,000

4.(4) ATWT: Monday, 11/12: 2.5/3,530,000

7.(7) ATWT: Monday, 1/15: 2.6/3,514,000

5.(5) ATWT: Wednesday, 2/14: 2.6/3,492,000

4.(6) ATWT: Tuesday, 5/8: 2.6/3,480,000

4.(8) ATWT: Thursday, 1/25: 2.6/3,462,000

3.(3) ATWT: Thursday, 12/13: 2.6/3,449,000

4.(U) ATWT: Tuesday, 1/2: 2.5/3,448,000

3.(3) ATWT: Tuesday, 12/18: 2.5/3,441,000

OLTL

5.(6) OLTL: Monday, 1/15: 3.0/3,910,000

4.(6) OLTL: Friday, 2/9: 2.7/3,735,000

U.(U) OLTL: Friday, 3/16: 2.8/3,662,000

4.(7) OLTL: Monday, 2/26: 2.8/3,654,000

6.(4) OLTL: Tuesday, 2/13: 2.8/3,574,000

4.(4) OLTL: Tuesday, 6/19: 2.5/3,525,000

4.(4) OLTL: Monday, 2/12: 2.7/3,524,000

5.(5) OLTL: Monday, 2/19: 2.8/3,523,000

4.(7) OLTL: Thursday, 2/1: 2.7/3,521,000

4.(4) OLTL: Wednesday, 7/18: 2.6/3,506,000

AMC

4.(4) AMC: Wednesday, 2/14: 3.0/3,989,000

4.(5) AMC: Tuesday, 2/13: 2.9/3,855,000

4.(4) AMC: Monday, 2/19: 3.0/3,852,000

5.(4) AMC: Monday, 2/26: 2.8/3,647,000

6.(5) AMC: Monday, 1/15: 2.8/3,599,000

3.(2) AMC: Friday, 3/16: 2.8/3,582,000

5.(6) AMC: Thursday, 2/1: 2.8/3,503,000

4.(5) AMC: Tuesday, 2/6: 2.7/3,497,000

2.(4) AMC: Friday, 5/11: 2.6/3,483,000

4.(4) AMC: Friday, 3/2: 2.6/3,483,000

DAYS

3.(3) DAYS: Monday, 1/15: 3.2/4,266,000

3.(5) DAYS: Monday, 1/29: 2.8/3,810,000

3.(4) DAYS: Friday, 1/12: 2.7/3,745,000

4.(3) DAYS: Monday, 1/8: 2.8/3,736,000

4.(3) DAYS: Tuesday, 1/16: 2.8/3,705,000

4.(5) DAYS: Wednesday, 1/10: 2.6/3,554,000

3.(4) DAYS: Wednesday, 1/17: 2.7/3,547,000

3.(4) DAYS: Friday, 1/5: 2.8/3,542,000

3.(U) DAYS: Tuesday, 1/2: 2.7/3,530,000

6.(5) DAYS: Thursday, 2/1: 2.7/3,448,000

GL

7.(8) GL: Thursday, 2/1: 2.6/3,396,000

6.(8) GL: Monday, 1/22: 2.4/3,307,000

8.(8) GL: Tuesday, 2/13: 2.6/3,286,000

8.(8) GL: Wednesday, 2/14: 2.5/3,286,000

3.(8) GL: Friday, 1/26: 2.4/3,263,000

8.(8) GL: Wednesday, 1/31: 2.4/3,245,000

7.(8) GL: Tuesday, 2/6: 2.5/3,240,000

7.(8) GL: Thursday, 3/1: 2.4/3,175,000

6.(8) GL: Wednesday, 1/24: 2.2/3,158,000

8.(8) GL: Monday, 1/15: 2.3/3,128,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't see the drop for Days being due to any fanbase. John's return wasn't promoted that much and they actually put him on sooner than I thought they would -- and they're giving J&M scenes sooner than I expected too. lucas was on last week so whatever fans he has actually had some halfway decent scenes to watch. The holiday week makes more sense since the drop really wasn't huge. Hopefully as word keeps getting out that the show is good people will find their way back -- and hopefully the show will *stay* good and hold onto the viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been checking out the ratings archives just to see how far Days has come and it's pretty noticeable, especially in total viewers and dailies. This shows the growth Days has had since early September, as well as it's nice rebound from the time slot switch and a drop after John's death aftermath. It starts with the numbers for the week of Sept. 3-7, 2007 and ends with this current week. It proves Days is doing quite well and that it's on the right track at least to rebuilding it's audience. I know this is long but it's interesting, at least to me :lol:.

Total Viewers:

7. 2,588,000 (+49,000/-662,000)

8. 2,453,000 (-135,000/-723,000)

8. 2,312,000 (-141,000/-864,000)

7. 2,406,000 (+94,000/-740,000)

8. 2,340,000 (-66,000/-653,000)

8. 2,391,000 (+51,000/-995,000)

8. 2,600,000 (+209,000/-433,000)

5. 2,760,000 (+160,000/-457,000)

8. 2,344,000 (-416,000/-846,000)

7. 2,543,000 (+199,000/-593,000)

6. 2,688,000 (+145,000/-592,000)

8. 2,561,000 (-127,000/-793,000)

5. 2,706,000 (+145,000/-559,000)

6. 2,616,000 (-90,000/-543,000)

5. 2,668,000 (+52,000/-402,000)

5. 2,606,000 (-62,000/-723,000)

5. 2,950,000 (+344,000/-662,000)

4. 3,102,000 (+152,000/-255,000)

*Latest Ratings: 5. 2,838,000 (-264,000/-684,000)

HH:

7. 2.0 (same/-.6)

8. 1.9/7 (-.1/-.6)

8. 1.8 (-.1/-.7)<-----------Ties All Time Low

7. 1.9 (+.1/-.6)

8. 1.8/7 (-.1/-.6) <------- ties low rating

8. 1.8/6 (same/-.8) <---- ties low rating

7. 2.0/7 (+.2/-.4)

6. 2.1/7 (+.1/-.4)

6. 1.9/7 (-.2/-.6)

7. 1.9/7 (same/-.5)

6. 2.0/7 (+.1/-.6)

7. 2.0/6 (same/-.6)

5. 2.1/7 (+.1/-.4)

5. 2.1/7 (same/-.4)

5. 2.1/7 (same/-.3)

5. 2.0/7 (-.1/-.5)

5. 2.1/6 (+.1/-.6)

4. 2.3/7 (+.2/-.4)

Latest Ratings:5. 2.1/7 (-.2/-.6)

Women 18-49:

5. 1.3 (-.1/-.6)

5. 1.3 (same/-.5)

5. 1.3 (same/-.5) <-----------Ties All Time Low

6. 1.2 (-.1/-.6)

7. 1.1/8 (-.1/-.6) <------ ties low rating

7. 1.1/7 (same/-.8) <----- ties low rating

5. 1.3/9 (+.2/-.4)

2. 1.5/10 (+.2/-.3)

4. 1.2/8 (-.3/-.6)

3. 1.5/9 (+.3/-.3)

3. 1.4/9 (-.1/-.4)

4. 1.3/8 (-.1/-.4)

3. 1.4/9 (+.1/-.4)

4. 1.3/9 (-.1/-.5)

2. 1.4/9 (+.1/-.3)

3. 1.3/9 (-.1/-.5)

3. 1.4/8 (+.1/-.3)

2. 1.5/8 (+.1/-.4)

Latest Ratings:2. 1.5/9 (same/-.4)

Women 18-34:

1. 1.2(same/-.6)

2. 1.1 (-.1/-.7)

2. 1.1 (same/-.7)<-----------Ties All Time Low

2. 1.1 (same/-.8)

3. 1.0/7 (-.1/-.7)

2. 1.0/7 (same/-1.0)

2. 1.1/7 (+.1/-.5)

1. 1.3/9 (+.2/-.5)

3. 0.8/5 (-.5/-1.0)

1. 1.2/8 (+.4/-.7)

1. 1.1/7 (-.1/-.6)

1. 1.1/7 (same/-.4)

1. 1.1/7 (same/-.5)

1. 1.1/7 (same/-.7)

1. 1.1/7 (same/-.6)

1. 1.1/7 (same/-.5)

4. 0.9/5 (-.2/-.6)

1. 1.3/8 (+.4/-.4)

Latest Ratings: 1. 1.2/7 (-.1/-.6)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

9. 15,000 (-18,000/-40,000)

7. 18,000 (+3,000/-28,000)

7. 18,000 (same/-28,000)

4. 26,000 (+8,000/-26,000)

2. 35,000 (+9,000/-3,000)

3. 44,000 (+9,000/-35,000)

2. 49,000 (+5,000/+3,000)

2. 23,000 (-26,000/-21,000)

6. 17,000 (-6,000/-15,000)

7. 18,000 (+1,000/-44,000)

5. 42,000 (+24,000/-3,000)

5. 49,000 (+7,000/-18,000)

7. 19,000 (-30,000/-51,000)

7. 14,000 (-5,000/-52,000)

6. 25,000 (+11,000/-31,000)

4. 35,000 (+10,000/-61,000)

1. 116,000 (+81,000/+12,000)

1. 82,000 (-34,000/+19,000)

Men 18+ Viewers

7. 491,000 (+11,000/-119,000)

8. 498,000 (+7,000/-155,000)

8. 426,000 (-72,000/-227,000)

8. 467,000 (+41,000/-198,000)

8, 441,000 (-26,000/-157,000)

8. 470,000 (+29,000/-206,000)

8. 506,000 (+36,000/-42,000)

8. 523,000 (+17,000/-35,000)

8. 442,000 (-81,000/-163,000)

8. 457,000 (+15,000/-138,000)

8. 535,000 (+78,000/-116,000)

7. 547,000 (+12,000/-97,000)

4. 605,000 (+58,000/-55,000)

6. 597,000 (-8,000/+39,000)

5. 532,000 (-39,000/-110,000)

Not Available

5. 656,000 (+124,000/-30,000)

3. 711,000 (+55,000/+94,000)

Dailies

Week of 9/3

special episode

1.9

2.0

1.9

2.1

Week of 9/10

1.9/2,388,000

2.0/2,691,000

1.8/2,398,000

1.9/2,325,000

1.9/2,466,000

Week of 9/17

1.8/2,288,000

1.9/2,317,000

1.9/2,435,000

1.7/2,270,000

1.7/2,249,000

Week of 9/24

1.8/2,278,000

2.0/2,439,000

1.9/2,284,000

1.8/2,323,000

2.0/2,705,000

Week of 10/1

1.9/2,409,000

1.8/2,308,000

1.7/2,245,000

1.8/2,312,000

1.9/2,428,000

Week of 10/8

1.8/2,393,000

1.7/2,275,000

1.9/2,372,000

1.7/2,352,000

1.9/2,564,000

Week of 10/15

2.0/2,637,000

2.0/2,621,000

1.9/2,579,000

2.0/2,638,000

1.9/2,525,000

Week of 10/22

2.1/2,624,000

2.2/2,979,000

2.0/2,611,000

2.0/2,625,00

2.1/2,962,000

Week of 10/29

1.9/2,457,000

1.8/2,238,000

1.8/2,322,000

1.9/2,283,000

2.0/2,419,000

Week of 11/5

1.8/2,387,000

1.9/2,513,000

1.9/2,588,000

2.0/2,578,000

2.0/2,649,000

Week of 11/12

2.2/2,876,000

2.1/2,735,000

2.0/2,558,000

2.0/2,583,000

2.0/2,687,000

Week of 11/19

1.9/2,561,000

2.0/2,441,000

2.0/2,682,000

preempted

1.9/2,654,000 (special - did not count)

Week of 11/26

2.2/2,886,000

2.0/2,714,000

2.0/2,503,000

2.2/2,759,000

2.1/2,669,000

Week of 12/3

2.1/2,704,000

2.1/2,494,000

2.1/2,647,000

2.1/2,699,000

1.9/2,534,000

Week of 12/10

2.0/2,722,000

2.2/2,930,000

2.1/2,577,000

2.0/2,541,000

2.0/2,567,000

Week of 12/17

2.0/2,557,000

2.1/2,795,000

1.9/2,446,000

1.9/2,376,000

2.1/2,858,000

Week of 12/24

1.9/2,656,000 (did not count)

1.4/2,061,000 (did not count)

2.1/3,072,000

2.0/2,846,000

2.1/2,933,000

Week of 12/31

2.2/2,988,000 (did not count)

preempted

2.3/3,161,000

2.3/3,130,000

2.2/3,013,000

Week of 1/7/08 (Latest Ratings)

2.2/2,876,000

2.1/2,735,000

2.1/2,727,000

2.1/2,845,000

2.2/3,009,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy