Jump to content

ALL: Would you accept a "straight" character coming out late in life?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Katie, Henry and Nancy are girlfriends, so I could see them taking her out to a gay bar for fun. Who knows, Nancy could see someone and who knows...

BTW, I completely disagree with anyone who thinks Stephanie Forrester is a lesbian! I think they dress her like a man because it's comfortable. I recall Flannery was very happy to be able to wear her natural hair and not have to dye it or wear a wig. She's a simple woman, but Stephanie is not. Stephanie wants to have sex with her own son! That's not a lesbian in my book.

I *wish* the writers would allow her a new love interest, but I feel sexism is at play. That old goat Eric can date his granddaughter, but Stephanie is left to pine after her son, be alone or beg Eric to take her back. Also, look how young Ridge's kids are compared to Brooke. It would totally make my day to see Stephanie hook up with...say Clarke? That would be HOT and a lot of fun!

ETA:

I would also FORCE Flannery into a dress once and a while. She can keep her trainers on, under the dress. She's not too big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My whole idea for the Zarf storyline was that he'd go out to bars and clubs as Zoe (kinda like Viki going out as Nikki), and one of those nights, she has a few drinks with Josh, they get close over some weeks, it all builds up, and then Josh learns that all the while, he was attracted to someone who was born a male. Then there'd be conflict...would they stay together, would they not stay together? That sort of thing.

And then we'd get to hear Erica dish out some fabulous zingers such as..."Well, Josh, I already have a long-lost child...and I already have a gay child. What quota shall you fill?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On B&B, I could easily see Felicia Forrester just coming out and saying..."Mom, dad, I'm GAY and I LOVE KITTY!" Not sure if Lesli Kay meant to play the scenes this way, but when she encouraged Ridge to date Ashley, she was practically all but wet talking about her. And the whole, "If you like her so much, why don't you date her line," with Felicia kind of having that curious look on her face did it for me. Not to mention Eileen and Lesli's chemistry was off the charts.

I could also see Thorne having a male fling too, but Winsor Harmon would NEVER play that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a really fascinating thread. I particularly agree with Faulkner's comments that the soap press seem oblivious to Stephanie Forrester's transformation over the years. With the rewrite of Douglas family history and childhood abuse, it's almost been suggested that Stephanie has simply transformed into her father but it doesn't sit particularly well with the character as she was originally intended. In the early days, she was written as beautiful icy blonde (almost like a middle aged Hitchcock heroine) who was a pinnacle of class and obsessed with keeping up appearances. Somewhere along the line she morphed into the aggressive crew cut and pantsuit we know today who has a habit of ruining the Forrester reputation with tasteless public diatribes.

If they were willing to address this in a lesbian story I'd be all for it but they seem to go to great lengths to avoid any mention of Stephanie's physicality so I don't see it working. It's a weird situation because if I was Brad Bell I'd either have addressed it or forced Flannery to maintain some feminine wardrobe for the show. Sneakers for closeups and heels for the longshots. :lol: It brings all these lesbian issues to play because it's so distinctly a choice on Susan Flannery's part. She has a perfectly dressable figure for a woman of her age and her hair could be styled more appropriately for the show even if she prefers it slicked back in real life.

Revisiting Katherine Chancellor, I'd still buy her having a lesbian relationship even now. In some cases when older people enter same sex relationships, it's just as much about companionship as being secretly gay. If sex becomes less important, so physical attractiveness is less of an issue and I can see Katherine taking up with another woman. I'd love Y&R to have the balls to do that kind of story.

Looking towards the younger crowd on soaps, I think bisexuality would be perfectly easy to play for a lot of characters. Felicia Forrester screams the type of girl who would have sex with men and women if only as part of a her rebellion. She totally would show up at a fashion show with a female model on her arm. I also think it would work to have some of the the gigolo type characters like David Vickers to have been known as gay for pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could definitely accept a story like this. I have a few friends that have come out later in life (mid-30s to early 40s) that got married at a young age, had children, etc. And it's not that they "became gay" as time went on, they were always gay. They just got married because they couldn't accept their sexuality at the time.

The same type of story could be done on soaps. If the writers are thoughtful and handle the story with respect, it could come of very believable. Of course, we're in a soap world now wherein most writers and producers want stories told much faster than a story like this one should be told.

It would be completely unbelievable if GL did one of their infamous "Inside the Light" episodes on a character like Bill or perhaps Gus, that in one hour we learn that he's always been attracted to men, but got married out of fear of his sexuality. The story should be told gradually, old-school style and I think that viewers would buy it. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy