Jump to content

Y&R Spoilers: A Picture's Worth a Thousand Words


Recommended Posts

  • Members

And what reason did Phyllis have to care about either of those two juveniles? Dru and Sharezombie got literally knocked off their pedestal for their self righteous hypocrisy, and have only themselves to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

She cared because she wanted Neil on the board of directors. Who did Sharon consider when she was looking after her own coochie with Brad. Was she considering her son, her sister in law, her reputation. No, she thought about nothing other than her own selfish desires. And Phyllis should be held to a different standard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously though...

This whole "St. Phyllis Of The Pure & Martyred" stuff from Phyllis Fans is gettin BEYOND outta pocket with the need to destroy character after character (via revisionist history no less) to prop their Mary Sue character's sociopathic azz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that Phyllis should be martyred, but Saint Sharon is by no means pure, innocent and above reproach. I just love how Phyllis is held to a standard that the rest are not. Sharon is a super-slut and Dru was her enabler. And who has been destroyed? Did Sharon give a sh!t about Victoria when Bill Bell was alive? No she slept with Diego. She isn't being written out of character, as she lives to screw her in-laws to stick it to Nikki and Victoria.

Was Dru not a hot headed stick your fat arse in the middle of every ones drama type of person? When did she say to herself, this is none of my business? Who has been sacrificed for Phyllis? Nick, who didn't even know the difference between Sharon and Grace? Jack who didn't trust his wife/lover and would assume the worst of her? I just don't understand how anyone can see Dru and Sharon as the good guys in this, would you really want them to be your friends?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sharon has NEVER called herself a saint.

PHYLLIS FANS have referred to her that way (just as they did to Cricket).

Phyllis is not held to a standard.

The ONLY standard Phyllis is held to is BEIN A DECENT PERSON which is kind of hard to do when the character is the sociopath to end all sociopaths.

Now let's take this fact by fact shall we...

Sharon slept with Diego way BEFORE Victoria did (which was way after BB's tenure ended).

Sharon does NOT live to "screw her in laws" cause NEVER not ONCE did she EVER have anything negative to say to Nikki that WASN'T provoked by Nikki herself.

And she & Victor have always been close.

Victoria & Sharon were really tight prior to the Diego Debacle & the destruction of their friendship was as much Diego's fault as it was Sharon's.

Drucilla is/was definitely a hot head but she was stickin up for a friend.

The same friend that was bein bullied in almost the exact same way by the exact same person who bullied her over somethin that happened to be in BOTH INSTANCES none of HER (Phyllis) business.

So what's good for the sociopathic Goose is just as good for the hotheaded (but NON sociopathic) Gander.

So Phyllis can eat a mound of yellow snow & go straight to hell without passin GO cause that sociopathic broad deserves every bit of what she gets from now until eternity.

And every character has been sacrificed to prop St. Phyllis Of The Pure & Marytred.

First it was The Romalotti-Chancellors, then The Blair-Williams, then The Abbotts, then The Barber-Winters, then The Newmans, now it's The Baldwin-Fishers.

A year ago it was Sharon & Jack (again) who she was sheddin crocodile tears about hurtin.

A year before that it was Nick & Cassie.

A year before that it was Neil & Drucilla.

A year before that it was Malcolm & Samurai Chemist.

A year before that it was John & Danny.

A year before that it was Jack & Diane.

A year before that it was Victor & Victoria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, here is a comment from someone who isn't a Phyllis fanatic or whatever some of you have called them

Phyllis blackmailed Sharon and Brad because she could.

Sharon made Phyllis out to be the tramp who ruined her marriage. But at the same time Sharon was pining away for Brad and even on his wedding day still tried to make the day about her feelings for him.

Sharon slept with Brad not because she was hurt by Nick, she slept with him because she had wanted to for a long time. Long before Nick slept with Phyllis.

Sharon was the one who reached and grabbed Phyllis' phone and then dumbass Dru couldn't mind her own business and had to come barging in and started grabbing the phone too without even knowing what was going on. It was Sharon and then Dru who let go and fell backwards causing their own arses to fall over. Yeah sure, Phyllis was trying to get even for all the hell that Sharon put her through and she seems to own that guilt, but it was Sharon and Dru that were the idiots who decided to play grabbyass over a cell phone on a cliff.

Bye Dru, sure hope you come back some day with a recast because even though you were a nosey interfering twit you were fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nosey interfering twit?

That? Would be Phyllis.

LMAO@Phyllis Fans will find ANY excuse to justify her unending hypocrisy, extortion & blackmail.

Dru knew enough of the score to know what Giggly Heffa was doin & she smacked that ho down for her friend.

The hell that SHARON put Phyllis through?

Oh sorry I missed the part where SHARON was sleepin with the father of PHYLLIS children on the day of her WEDDING ANNIVERSARY as well as the day of her DEAD CHILD'S BIRTHDAY while Phyllis was deeply depressed & all but paralyzed with grief.

...Yeah. :rolleyes:

The situation would have NEVER gotten to the point it did had Giggly Heffa NOT felt the need to be the world's BIGGEST self righteous hypocrite EVER, yet it's Sharon's & Dru's fault that they went over the cliff?!

No. Way. In. Hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy