Jump to content

SOW: Bloodbath at GL


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The cuts continue at Guiding Light - this time four writers are out. Penelope Koechl, Royal Miller, David Smilow and Brett Staneart have all been let go, according to show sources.

"Their work will be absorbed by the rest of the team," says an insider. GL is up for renewal this summer, so the last-minute belt-tightening to ensure that it's picked up. When asked the backstage slashings, a show rep responded, " We don't comment on contracts."

Kim Zimmer (Reva) is doing her best behind the scenes to jazz up her scripts and storyline, which, as viewers know, has been somewhat lacking in direction. "I've managed to find a creative way for me to deal with those problems through my approach to the character now," Zimmer explains, acknowledging that she's a little restless. "And it's not subtle, so I'm sure you all will pick it up."

In the meantime, GL might want to borrow one of those fifth-graders from that new FOX show show- on the March 29 episode, Rick said "irregardless' to Beth, which of course is not a word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I've always thought that some hourlong shows had way too many writers on staff. It's like, "WTF do all of these people do?" It seems like there are like 20 people in some of the writing staff credits.

With a stronger head-writer, I wouldn't mind GL having a smaller writing staff.

As for Zimmer, if she's so restless, why the hell won't she just LEAVE already?! It's not like Reva adds that much to the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reva's a big part of GL and its history. I'm no KZ fan but I recognize this.

However, with MADD no longer running things on behalf of P&G, La Zimmer cannot make the same demands she used to get away with. No pay cut, Kim? No problem! We'll just fire most of the Bauers and stick Marj Dusay, Beth Chamberlain and Maureen Garrett on recurring!

GL is badly hurting for cash and MADD isn't there anymore to acquiesce to the "star" of the show. KZ may have been on a lot last year, but she can thank Tom Pelphrey for coasting on his frontburner status. I'm not sure Ellen Wheeler is so willing to ask "How high?" whenever Kim orders her to jump. JMO.

And, really, what on earth can you write for a character who has cheated violent death countless times, been cloned, turned Amish, turned psychic and then un-psychic and outwitted cancer? AND make it fresh and interesting and a "new direction" for the character? That's dificult for a GOOD writer, let alone a moderately average one like Kreizman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I've always underlined that fact. Thank God I'm not alone. Douglas Marland had 5 subwriters, of which 2 were BDWs, others were SWs, and I think he wrote a portion of daily scripts himself. Aetas aurea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, someone could start and make her a real person. And not any sort of mockery or whatsoever. I actually have quite a strong dislike for the character and her being in the spotlight as one of the most important GL characters, but what can you do...

Anyway, wasn't she created by Pam K. Long, who also introduced Alexandra Spaulding and Harley Davidson Cooper?

The show is in such a sad state and has been in it for years, and it is in a desperate need of a miracle-worker. But that someone will apparently never come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Four writers let go and its a bloodbath? I think some writers at SOW need to be fired.

Big deal that 4 writers were cut...BIG DEAL.

Good lord, they need to focus more on promoting the soaps instead of trying to tear them down.

And Cat...Maureen Garrett was on recurring LONG before Kim ZImmers contract issue, as was Beth Chamberlin I believe.

Stop laying blame on her..she had every right to want her contract to be honored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I made a wrong accusation or got my facts muddled, then I honestly do apologize. But I thought MG was put on contract for the whole Roger's Son SL (Sebastian?) and then put back on recurring again around the time the budget troubles became acute -- and when KZ demanded they pay her the same as in her previous contract cycle. Not that I'm criticizing that -- I think she deserves to be paid the same money as before and GL were essentially gaslighting her to take the cut so that others would follow. But the fact remains that she didn't back down, and so GL chose to make cuts from elsewhere -- namely on some other actors' salaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beth Chamberlin and Liz Kiefer were placed on recurring back in 2003, as was Maureen Garrett. It's also my understanding that Garrett has moved away from NYC and is busy doing something else non-acting. Marj Dusay was dropped to recurring in 2005. Michael O'Leary was placed back on contract, as was Jordan Clarke. Beth Chamberlin works more than some contract players, and it's up to the writers to decide who to use, hence no Blake since last November. Laying all the blame on Zimmer is so old and passe, and frankly, can be disproven.

Hell, even GL could have Jonathan go out in style with an on-location shoot while Y&R looked silly with their green-screen effects for Dru's demise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
    • Gone are the days where at least once every week, a character would pull a gun on someone (Ron you really turned gun violence into a joke on this show)
    • Oooooo I like these. I like we are on the same page about Little Brownie Man. And I hope to remember this at the end of June to see how much of it came to pass. I definitely feel that the Eva vs Kat story is about to reaaaally get going.    As for the B/C stories, it's funny you mentioned the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story first. Because out of all of those, it is the only one that has enough structure and build to it that it could keep going as a B story that could eventually climax. I think the only POV we don't have in it is Joey's at this point because Month 2 put in the work to give us Doug's and Vanessa's and they are now circling each other and their relationship. And we still need to know Joey's endgame.   Why we gotta pick on Jacob and Naomi? We need that goody good couple. lol. They talked about how they got together. Mind you, very briefly. But we do need to know a little bit more about both. Something I was hoping we were getting by having them in their own stories....him with the crooked cop, her with the lawsuit...but it didn't turn out as hoped. Hopefully, that won't be the case with June though.   Yeah, I want to see more of THAT Ashley.  I finally had to break down and explain to my manager why I keep laughing every time I see the bottle of Febreze at work. The product placement definitely be working.
    • I’m one of those people

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That is a specific example where I would agree with those fans so I would be critical of the execs doing so. I frankly think that "caring" in this regard is not conducive to dialog. Basically you point out its very subjective nature. What is caring to one person might be callous disregard to another. I suggest it is a trap & we fell in it!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy