Jump to content

SOD: Two Different Covers


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know that in the past SOD does different versions, but I thought they stopped and plus I heard no mention of GL *FINALLY* getting some type of cover...The left is the one I got in the mail and the right is the store bought! Just started getting it this week. Thoughts???

100_1677.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There was another two cover one with the issue dated February 6th, 2007: the one on the website was GH and the one I got (I'm a subsriber) was OLTL.

This is the breakdown so far this year:

AMC: 1 cover. 1 inset = 2

ATWT: 1 cover (shared) = 1

B&B: insets = 1

DAYS: 4 covers (one shared); insets: 1 = 5

GH: 5 covers . 1 inset = 4

GL: 1

OLTL: 1 cover inset = 1 = 2

PSNS: 1 inset = 1

Y&R: 3 covers (one shared) = 3 insets = 1

Basically it is GH, DAYS, Y&R, random soap, then the routine stars over.

You can get the rest of the list at my msn group. http://groups.msn.com/UltimateSoapFan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They've been doing this for a year now, on occasion, but for subscribers issues only. A year ago, they sent a survey to some of their subscribers through email and it had a lot of questions about the cover, so I think this is in response to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate when they doing that. As a subscriber and GH fan i want the GH covers, but instead of GH you get a cover of a not so popular soap. But in the supermarkets you get the mags with the more popular soaps like GH, Days and Y&R. this is not fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is I'm from Europe, so I don't have the chance to go to the supermarket and just buy it, i have to subscribe it. I always looking forward to get the issues with GH on the cover but when they arrive they have other covers (not always but very often).That is what bothers me. Especially with this Scotty cover, i could care less if it was Jason or Sonny/Carly. If they would put GL on the cover from begin with, it would be fine by me. I also love GL, don't get me wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know what I miss? The old cover photo shoots that they used to do. The last one I saw with GL was the whole Richard dies cover (which was an awesome cover). Now it's just a picture of an actor (or two) with a generic picture. Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy