Jump to content

Passions Criticized for DOWN-LOW Storyline


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I gave up that garbage show in October and will never watch it again under any cricumstance. But I could, however, be swayed if the last eppy featured Reilly being strung from a balcony by his very small penis. That would be must see and very fitting with the show that went downhill very fast...

But I think many are missing why this story reeks of ridiculousness. Of course the DL is out of nowhere, but I believe the real question is:

How did this man go from a sexual obsession with his sister to wanting someone else, especially another man? How is Reilly tackling a social issue here? There is no story. Reilly just made Chad gay just like he did Simone.

And add to this that only the black characters on this horrid show are gay?

Seems to me that people are angry for the wrong reasons...

Why not have Epig on the DL (white men are just as guilty of this) or Luis, which would have been an even bigger shocker.

Chad and his perverted need to be with the woman he thought to be his sister should have been address, but noooooooo, Reilly just moves onto the next stunt.

News flash Reilly, I think gay people like quality television too... IDIOT!

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I knew they would get backlash for this and I had a feeling they would bring up Rae's murder.

It's sad because Passions portrayed Simone's coming out in a pretty good way. Her relationship with Rae was well done with the exception of when they implied that Alistair paid Rae to make Simone gay. Other then that, I liked Simone's story . My only complaint wwas they never showed us enough scenes with her and Rae to see their relationship progressing.

This Chad thing has been rumored for months so why soaps writers act surprised about it is beyond me. Nevertheless, the character of Chad has been destroyed with this. I don't mind the idea of the story but Chad would never do this to Whitney. Not after wanting her even when they beleived she was his sister. He never gave up on her and now the minute the reunite it we learn he has been having an affair with a man. Major character destruction but that is all this show has done in the past 2 years so no surprise. The only think I look forward to is Whitney finding out because I love Brook Kerr and I know she will give a solid performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its horrible. It makes NO sense that Chad is now gay. He was obsessed with being with Whitney to the point where he was seducing her when she was his sister. I dont see him doing that if he were go bc being siblings would have given him the perfect out to not be with her. He's always been about her and the minute he has her back, he goes and starts sleeping with a man? Um whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
A predator? And oh no, Chad drank out of a FLASK instead of champagne! WTF is this guy talking about. :lol:

So they killed of a gay character, big deal. Are they suppose to not kill her because she's gay? It's not like she was killed BECAUSE she was gay. She was killed because she was a threat to the Night Stalker. If Precious knew the identity of the NS, she would've been killed off too!

Social issue my ass. Passions has and always will be a plot written show. We all know that. We're not trying to be something we're not. (Yeah yeah, I know I'm saying "we're" like I'm part the show. LOL :lol:) Did you expect a Claire Labine type social storyline? I think not.

Eh, more press. Bring it on. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think where a lot of people are seeing this they are forgetting that Chad does not see himself as gay. This is just sex for him.

I have seen two shows do the down low story and some way why not make a down low story about a white guy - because if you did it wouldn't necessarily be a down low story. Down Low from the way it was explained in both shows I saw it on and from reading is exclusively a term used to describe Black Men who sleep with men. The men they sleep with might be white but the actual term refers to the black guy who goes out looking for this.

The only thing from my understanding - well maybe the biggest thing that I see JER has gotten wrong is that it appears Chad is using condoms. That is the only thing that throws the Down Low thing. From everything I have read a Down Low guy usually does not use condoms. For them to plan ahead to get the condoms is to admit what they are doing, and they can't do that. For them it is just sex with a guy just like it would be if they had an affair with a woman. With the guy though it has to happen - and not be planned.

Chad just sees this as sex and does not see himself as gay. So the issue of why all of a sudden Chad is gay has not come up in his mind. He is just fulfilling a natural urge to have sex.

I know that seems weird but that is the way I understand the Down Low thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

...Drinking from a flask is, IMO, a little sleazier than champagne or nothing at all. It is one of those things that just adds an extra element of skeev.

...OK, they didn't kill her BECAUSE she was gay – but when numbers of gay characters are so low, when you kill one it makes a difference. It makes people go, "Hmm, interesting. I wonder why they chose that route." The write chose to put on of the few gay characters on the show in a situation where she is killed.

...It doesn't matter that massacring social stories is what Passions is about. If it is what they are about and they do a [!@#$%^&*]-poor job of it, people have the right to complain.

And I know you want to bring the press on, but it hasn't helped the show yet. It never has. It has just made what is simply an embarrassment a publicized embarrassment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steven,

You make some very valid points, but as far Chad not seeing himself as gay is not even the point for me. At least I don't think it is. When did he have time to sleep around with men while he was obsessing over getting his sister back? My problem is not that this "story" is being told but that Reilly is the person telling it.

It's all of a sudden and it makes no sense due to the events transpiring before it. Nothing adds up here.

Also, I was watching a program, and you are dead on as to the condom issue. Black men will infect their female partners before they admit to being gay.

But I have to maintain my stance on the blacks/gays/Trassions issue. So far, the two characters to have homosexual relationships are black.

So this story, of course under someone other that that moron Reilly, could have easily been told and just as shocking with a white character. and it would have been a real story and not just a stunt.

Andrea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing the PASSIONS people aren't understanding is that, although condoms do help prevent the spread of STDs, they are not 100%. I think to use that as an excuse to justify Chad screwing around on Whitney is just wrong on every level.

And this is nothing new. If GLAAD or any gay outlet wanted to be upset about the way gay were portrayed, they should have aggressively went after PASSIONS during the Charlie storyline. That was offensive enough.

I say let PASSIONS go for broke(back). They have nothing to lose anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
    • I do think there's room for optimism, especially with Amazon making enough new episodes to last until December. There's still time for the various players to get their ducks in a row. Guess we'll know soon enough! 
    • I do agree it's better to just have people pop back into town. I never understood why Roger needed a mask on an island, when neither Fletcher or Alex would've known who he was. And the vine...sigh. Couldn't he have just been sent crashing through a window or something?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy