Jump to content

DAYS: Monday, February 19th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Alice's/Tuscany is one of DAYS permanant sets. After Bonnie is gone, I wouldn't think it would still be Alice's? Unless Maggie takes it back over but keeps the name, but turns it back into a fine dining restaurant?

Chez Rouge was the fourth most used set in January, so it would probably cost them more to break it apart and turn it into the Dimansion every other day, instead of just shipping Maggie back to Alice's, which is not currently being used. Who knows though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh, Alice's is definitely going to be gone but they may choose to disregard that set all together and put it a way for future use rather then use it right away.

Chez Rouge has been used alot but it may not be at some points. It would be tedious to keep taking apart and all. Who knows is right. I personally don't care. Whatever they need to do for the budget and show is fine by me. Better then more firings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of Hogan's best episodes yet. Absolutely flawless. I love the teen scene, and every scene with them just worked. I'm finally feeling Steve's danger as well as the Steve/Kayla romance. And EJ/Stefano just rocked my world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days really does have a fantastic teen set..I absolutely love chelsea, nick, and abby...I really enjoyed chelsea and abby's scenes today...I was surprised that abby revealed to chelsea that she knew for a while that Nick was lonely splicer...chelsea's reaction was very realistic..

Steve and Kayla kind of bored me in the begining, i kind of zoned out..but their final scenes were great...

Stefano and EJ's scenes were great, very gothic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG, "Days" is SO cheap! Am I the only who realizes that they seem to play the SAME tropical-sounding song over and over again in scenes in fancy restaurants?

I can remember it in many scenes now:

Patrick/hope at Morgan Island

Just a few weeks ago with Sami and Kate and Lucas at Chez Rouge

Today!

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaam, bum, bum, buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam, bum, bum, buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum, bum, bum, bum, buuuuuuuum, bum, bum, buuuuuuuuuuum

HONESTLY, you guys!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See that Celeste scene is something I can't just say whatever to. It would have added so much drama to Stefano's return. I could understand if they weren't going to use her right now due to the budget but we know they are. Since it is a spoiler I won't mention how. But to me that was a miss on history because Celeste and Stefano had that connection.

It is something that could have easily been solved by either Hogan or the breakdown writers. They could have timed Stefano's return to go along with one of Celeste's appearances on the show. That would have handled the budget thing because she is already being paid. It would have been so neat to have had Celeste sitting there and suddenly get a chill or something and know that Mr. Evil himself had come back to Salem.

It was just a miss for me, and highly disappointing. If I have got to have Stefano back there are just certain things that can be done to make it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope we get a break from Nick/Chelsea soon. They've been doign what On-The-Run was doing earlier in the month. Not happy-making. I love them, but I don't love anyone this much.

I agree about Celeste. Hogan made a point about conencting EJ and Celeste - where is the drama there? I hope, with her moving in with Abe and Theo, we get some DiMera angst as well as general family angst when Lexie (recast or Renée) undoubtedly returns 'from the dead'.

And more on Stefano, I *NEVER* want to see Joe on Days again. I loved him as Stefano, yes, as so many have. I'd much rather have Days live on than have to pay his big bucks (or any other big bucks, for that matter), and to fall even harder on the budget. It's time for Stefano's reign to be over. The time has come for the new generation.

Was anyone else disappointed that Abby's part in the Lonely Splicer lie didn't cost her more? I suppose Lonely Splicer really did change Chelsea -- the old Chelsea wouldn't have given Abs the time of day anymore than should would Nick. Still, it's missed drama, IMO. Abby didn't want to get caught in the middle, but she was. Where's the drama?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you are saying but maybe it's not part of the story. Why should Hogan just put them in a scene if it has nothing to do with what he wants to do? Yes it would be neat but you don't just throw characters into scenes because they have a connection and all. If it moves story or has some affect on story, sure but we don't know if it would. Hogan may not want that to happen for some reason, most likely the fact that if Celeste was with Stefano she would warn everyone he is there and then the story may not go the way it was supposed to. There is a reason why EJ is hiding him so having Celeste there would only expose where he is. Celeste isn't afraid of EJ or his threats so there is nothing to silence her so she would go running to Roman, Bo, etc and tell them what is going on. That is why as much as I would like a Celeste/Stefano scene, I understand why we didn't get one because it's probably not part of the plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PR, Many times before when Celeste has had those feelings she didn't run to the authorities about it. And esp now all she would have to do is think that if Lexie is alive that this could put her life in danger and that would be enough to explain her not going to the authorities.

On the same not of the authorities, I am sure something could be dreamed up if not the Lexie thing or it could just be avoided. I mean unless I missed something no one ever mentioned going to the authorities and let them know where Stefano was back in December when John found him. I mean all the crimes this man has committed there has to be a thousand warrants out for his arrest. But yet no mention of John or any calling Interpol or anyone. So I am sure that could have been dealt with.

The scene didn't have to be a whole lot. Celeste could be involved in whatever it is she is going to be involved with and just in a conversation she could have gotten the "feeling of Stefano's return" which could have easily been explained to the person as nothing but yet giving the audience more of a feel of something bad coming.

It would have just added something more to the return to Salem which was rather bland to me. The scenes with EJ were good, but it didn't have the full impact it should have since this is the big bad Stefano DiMera returning to the city he has terrorized for most of his life.

PR, I like Hogan but I am still not ready to agree with him on everything. I think he is doing a good job but he is missing out on some things lately with the no fallout or even dealing with Lexie's accident being the biggest, and even Sami getting the best of Kate didn't have the punch it should have.

I just think he missed something here. It makes me wonder if he doesn't want Stefano's return to have that big of a punch. By having Stefano so sick and no big impact to this return, he makes EJ appear more powerful. Sort of passing the torch more to show that EJ has all the power now. It may not be, but he seems all about the future and downgrading the power of the villiany of Victor and Stefano. Depending on the outcome of this, I am seriously even hoping even more that Stefano would have stayed dead. I hope that the last images or thoughts of Stefano ever on the show are of a weak man that is even unable to speak. He was once too great of a villian to be remembered that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, I see your point. I guess I am just easier to please or maybe I am just happy that I am getting quality everyday now. The feeling I get is Celeste will be brought into this somehow, especially after her scenes today, but I don't think we needed her in scenes with Stefano. It would be nice but I don't think it was needed.

I don't think Stefano's return was meant to have a punch. It had punch back in December when J&M learned he was still alive and found him. That was the punch. The fans already knew he was alive and probably would turn up so I don't think Hogan was going for a big shock there.

I will agree with you too on the lack of Lexie fallout. The two weeks after that were really strange because so much seemed out of whack, especially the balance. It was almost as if alot of stuff was changed or re-written or changed for some reason last minute. I still think alot of it was Drake asked for time off due to personal issues and the show had to drag it's feet that week and change things (hence why the balance sucked). That is no excuse for the Lexie/Tek stuff which I feel Hogan did drop the ball on but I will forget it if Lexie returns. That is the only way it can be excused in my book and I think she will return very soon. The Sami/Kate stuff wasn't as huge as it should be but I think that was a good thing. I didn't want it overblown or over the top so I was ok with it.

The show has been much better in the last 2 weeks and for the start of this week. It's rebounded quite a bit from that weird week of bad balance and draggy pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess it is a matter of taste than not willing to be pleased.

The scene lost a lot of it's impact on my already because even though I should be spoiler free I'm not so I knew it was coming.

But this could have had the same impact as December did esp. to the fans who are spoiler free. I mean this wasn't even promoed. And this is February sweeps. Stefano's return to Salem could have been more intense and shocking to viewers.

I admit that this week is better as far as balance - at least so far - I am like Keith ready for a little break from Chelsea/Nick again. And the quality is good. But as far as excitement it is still a let down right now, and it is made more apparent to people who watch the other shows.

Days has the quality right now - there is no doubting that but the stuff still needs more punch - especially with what the other shows are putting on. I know that GH is the only one doing something big, but the other shows are moving with the murders, the fires, big reveals in stories like Y&R, etc. Days is still good drama but they need a punch and Stefano's return to Salem (not to the show) could have been some punch and excitement.

For months I have been happy with ATWT's quality and the acting (except for Peck) but the stories need punch and I kept saying that. Now I am saying it about Days. Hopefully it is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A big punch is needed. A big punch is needed for many shows. I watch many just like you and the only that has punch right now is GH IMO. Anyway, I am glad they did not promote Stefano's return. They did that in December and I wish they wouldn't have. I want it like the old days where he pops up and surprises everyone. I was mad that they showed him in the day ahead previews on Friday because I want his reappearing to be under the radar. That is what adds punch IMO.

I am sure we will see Days up the ante soon. I never expect them too during sweeps and I know people will say that sweeps is important but I would rather have Days build for 12 months of good drama rather then 3 months. I am hoping we will see exciting stuff ahead and I think we will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

About the Sami/Kate showdown lacking punch: It could be that Hogan is not into these big melodramatic confrontations like JER was when Sami or Kate was exposed for their latest scheme. To be honest, I'm glad it wasn't, only because this time, it was stupid. I don't want to see people confronting each other over a beam. That's not compelling drama, and the amount of time spent on questioning Sami about moving the beam was ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy