Jump to content

"It's the beginning of the end for daytime serials and soaps."


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Maybe someone should move this thread to the MyNetworkTV section, because this has more to do with those shows than daytime.

The *BIG* reason why MyNetworkTV didn't work MEIDEL is that these shows weren't even marketed properly. No one knew WHAT MyNetworkTV was, and a lot of people still don't.

I admit, FH and DESIRE weren't that great. But, WICKED WICKED GAMES and WATCH OVER ME were both soap masterpieces with excellent production values and really good acting(especially WWG and Tatum O'Neal).

Not if you promote the shows to diehard soap fanatics. Or, wait, how about promoting these shows at all!?

I hope the ratings register a 0HH after that. Without MyNetworkTV's all telenovela lineup, the network is pointless. But, you can't tell that to someone who doesn't like soaps to begin with.

With Meidel saying this, I'm not completely convinced the network will let AMERICAN HEIRESS and SAINTS & SINNERS run their full course. I think they will give up on them way earlier than their run.

Yep, 2007. The year that soaps died!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love my soaps and the networks should take into consideration the fact that unlike MyNetworkTV (which was admittedly trash when I watched it) daytime soaps are staples. The problem is not the show itself - it's what's going on with each show. All My Children is constantly alienating its own viewers; One Life to Live hasn't had a solid identity since Michael Malone's first run; As the World Turns is generic soap at best; Bold and Beautiful is so fickle you can't keep up; Passions began its descent toward exploitation and trash years ago. GH and GL have some great moments mixed in with the good/mediocre, and powerhouse Y&R is starting to show serious signs of strain. Overhaul the shows! Bring back vets, fire the hack writers, treat the shows with some sort of dignity and respect! It's all thanks to the Powers that Be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the problem that MyNetworkTV had was that they were trying to show a soap 5 days a week at NIGHT, and that is just something that does not work, 5 day a week soaps were meant for daytime, not primetime. That is why when Melrose Place and 90210 were on they were once a week not everyday, I am sure if they would have put them on everyday, they would have never lasted, same thing can be said about Dallas and Dynasty once a week which is all that a primetime soap should be on. Not to mention that there NEW soaps don't have millions of people that have been watching for 20 years or more as a start up base. I in no way shape or form view there problems at MyNetworkTV to the probelms that daytime has. Daytime's problem is storytelling, once upon a time daytime soaps all had great story tellers and storylines, and now alot of it is just throw whatever at the screen for a story and see if it sticks with the viewers. The only way daytime is going to fix its problems is to get back to storytelling and stop writing drivel for storylines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People these days talk about "The Sopranos" like they used to talk about "GH" and "Dallas." That's where people are getting their soap fix these days. Even they aren't what we think of as "soaps," a lot of prime-time shows have done a good job at adapting soap conventions to primetime genres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Showing soaps 4 or 5 days a week at night works very well in the UK. The top-rated shows are nighttime soaps there, with 4-6 episodes a week. MyNetworkTV just didn't promote itself or its telenovelas very well. I think a more established network could have a real hit with a 2- or 3-day a week nighttime soap. We see from a reality TV show like Big Brother or American Idol being on several days a week, also, that people can tune into a show for more than just one day a week at night.

Anyway it is NOT the beginning of the end for soaps. Jeff Zucker is clueless and just trying to justify his network's ineptness with daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy