Jump to content

DAYS: 2 Big Firings...


Angela

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

The difference, in my eyes, is that A/C are frontburner. And Abe and Lexie really never have been. People are complaining that A/C have been propping LUMI, but they are the same people who want Abe and Lexie. Abe and Lexie have been propping every G.D. character on the show for fifteen years - except themselves. If JR or RJ were actually used in a decent manner except for being pulled out of someone's sleeve every 9 months for one dramatic scene, it would be a different story for them in my eyes. I don't see why two characters who will NEVER be in a story are staying on a show with a budget crisis!

If you read my post, I said not the case for me, but people who have been watching the show for years before us? Sure they would prefer to have those six faces there in bad stories than newbies who can't act in so-so stories. That's human nature.

I don't know where you are seeing Rogers and the Hayes'.

  • Replies 501
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator
Posted

IMO, if you watch for only 1 or 2 characters and tune out whenever they aren't on, you are not a fan of 'Days of our Lives.' You are only a fan of that character or couple and not the show.

As a fan of the show, I want the show to do whatever it can to stay on the air and provide us with good writing/stories at the same time.

  • Members
Posted

Horrible stories ALSO make things unrecognizable. Bo and Hope and John and Marlena and Kate and Roman and Abe and Lexie and others were still front and center, it wasn't about the lack of Carrie and Austin it was the ATROCIOUS storytelling. It was killing Alice with a doughnut and bringing her and ten other people back in a story that made no sense, it was the repetitive awful dialogue, it was the overuse of flashbacks, it was the focus on ill thoughtout characters, it was Reilly being self-indulgent trying to relive some imagined glory days.

It was all these things, not the lack of Austin Peck and Christie Clark or Wayne Northop or Billy Warlock or Stephen Nichols or Mary Beth Evans. The show could and DID survive without them. The problem was the stories and the people behind those stories, pure and simple.

  • Members
Posted

AWESOME post, Vee! I couldn't agree more.

I seriously DO NOT understand what the big f*cking deal is about all of this! Since their return, the actors haven't shined at all, and yes, it is due to storyline. But they could've try a little.

Now if some extremely talented actor like Peter Reckell or Stephen Nichols were fired, I would think almost EVERY fan would be upset!

Austin and Carrie are NOT a supercouple! They WERE, and that's in the past. 2006, people. Not the 90s anymore.

I don't normally get off all pissed like this, but I had to prove my point. Sorry.

  • Members
Posted

What about Renee in the baby Isaac story? What about her and James's performances in the SSK?

Again, I don't know how you felt but was it different during the Salem Stalker? Was it okay for Jack, Abe, Maggie, Tony, etc etc to get killed because it was change for the future? They were all better actors IMHO with a lot more potential. And Austin and Carrie aren't even dying. So why would their exits make the show unrecognizable if you didn't think the SSK would when we assumed they were all dying?

  • Members
Posted

I love how all the people who are OK with this decision are using B/H, J/M, and S/K as saying they are the ones THEY would be mad at if they were fired.

Do you guys not see that A/C *WERE* the B/H and J/M and J/J and S/K of MANY viewers' generation????DAYS gained TONS of viewers in the mid-nineties.

  • Members
Posted

If things happen at completely different times under completely different circumstances that is a perfect example of not matching.

  • Members
Posted

Don't look like different circumstances to me, but the timing with DAYS is delayed.

I agree with that. But I hope that is not aimed at me. Or my posting here for like what eight years must have gone completely unnoticed.

  • Members
Posted

Peter Reckell left at one point.

Kristian Alfonso did too.

So did Deidre Hall.

The show survived, and viewers became fans of new characters and couplings.

Of course, this was before the Internet and fans that have gotten increasingly whiny and not willing to give a chance for anything.

And like Vee said, when the SSK was going on, many people were liking the story and continued to watch even as vets were being "killed."

Yet Peck, who used to be the whipping boy of the show, the one who was constantly criticized for his lack of talent, and Clark have sparked 14 pages of protest?

Give me a break.

  • Members
Posted

Well you know, I was a kid watching in the 90s too. Austin and Carrie meant a lot to me once. But you grow up and I don't see them the way I used to. I watched a lot of soaps back then and Days was pretty much junk food back then to me, not so great compared to others but I still watched and enjoyed. But it's been pretty bad for a long time to me, I'd like to see it better, and I never wanted Austin and Carrie back no matter if I liked their story once.

And no, I did not find the SSK excellent or suspenseful. I thought it was badly written and I thought it was wasteful, even though I had grown up watching Mr. Reilly's stories. It wasn't the same thing when I'm grown up. A lot of people were unhappy, a lot more than just this thing with Austin and Carrie, and they probably thought the show was becoming unrecognizable too. But why is it that if it's the SSK it's "being done for the future" and if it's Austin and Carrie under another writer it's "unrecognizable."

  • Members
Posted

I am one who doesn't watch a show just b/c a character or a couple is on, but I find it really hypocritical that some people are blowing off AP's and CC's firing as "oh well, the show will survive" (even though it's true) when they'd be pitching a god damn fit if let's say.....Deidre Hall was fired, or Peter Reckell, or Kristian Alfonso or Lauren Koslow or some of your favorites.

Each generation of soap fans have their favorites. While as a fan of the show, I'd be pissed if any of the above I named were fired, but I'd continue to be loyal to the show and watch. However, I'd be sympathetic to the people who's favs were fired.

For the record, I couldn't care less that Austin was fired b/c I don't really like him, but I honestly feel others could have been chosen instead of him. That's all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • So Pam didn't create her? I thought she had the whole of 87-88. I'll look around, thanks for the point in the right direction.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      date: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 | Jamey Giddens, Danielle Paige | Steven Williford Samantha, accept the fact you were in the wrong and do not deserve your digital devices. Do not like it? Go upstairs. Read a book. Do some knitting. Bradley and Martin's "we get it" to Tyrell was hilarious and absolutely a parent's thing to do. Loving a bit of history of both the Duprees (via Eva) and the Hawthrones (via Izaiah). So cute. Poor June. I am sure she did not purposefully mean to mess up; we have all been there working in customer service. Shake it off and keep on keeping on! Not twice a week for Vernon's cobbler order... Sharon must be using that as payment for their meetings. I appreciate that Ted still cares about the Duprees despite the end of his marriage to Nicole. Not Dana using Peaches' crisis as a way of taking Ted's attention away from a co-worker. Girl, do not be so obvious. Bradley is a man after my own heart with a simply divine chocolate milkshake. That is the way to go. Dana really needs to dial it back. Money will not buy her everything she wants and she will realise it soon enough. And I doubt Shanice is scared off by her idle threats, either. "With all due respect, Ms Thomas, this isn't a shopping mall." Oh, Dr Wilkes just owned Dana's arrogant ass. I love it. Wigs and personas? Okay now, Shanice ate with that read. I like that June assured Bradley that she will not replace him or Martin in the twins' lives. And that blood does not make a parent. Words never rang more true. Jessica reading Samantha was amazing. Dana would want to involve Ted. Her obsession is crossing beyond dangerous boundaries. Not Dana catching Vernon leaving Sharon's room at the country club. That is not good. Not good at all! Notes: Ugh. Not another breakdown from writer2. This week was going so well. Thankfully, Paige is an outstanding scriptwriter (one of this soap's best), and her words today are excellent. The food at Orphey Gene's does look bomb, so I do not blame any of the characters for uptalking it. I would eat there daily if I could. And gain hundreds of pounds, too. David Lami Friebe (Izaiah) continues to make me sick watching him, but he is nice to listen to. I still really like having June as the central person hub at Orphey Gene's. That familiar face you see when you walk in and have scenes. Dana wanting a second opinion means we could have an incoming doctor, right...?
    • Thank you for tagging me!!!!! And thank you to Soapdope78. It is wonderful!!!!
    • Credits for Tuesday, November 18, 2025: Created by: Frank & Doris Hursley Executive producer: Frank Valentini Head writers: Elizabeth Korte and Chris Van Etten Writers: Micah Steinberg; Scott Sickles and Cathy Lepard Director: Kate Mansi
    • Writers: Jamey Giddens Danielle Paige Director: Steven Williford
    • I am sure "no one cares" and it's not a big deal to some people, but this thread is full of certain posters calling out women's ages, their viability to have children at like 35, and their nail polish, but we celebrate everything Chandler Massey does and applaud any male shirtless scenes.  And then posters walk back being like it's just a joke and weren't serious lol.
    • I'm so glad she's still on the show. Seems like she may have dropped a hint about the real source of conflict between her and Dee, too. 
    • I don't know how reliable the information is, but from what I've read, he joined GH in 1977, and Alan (who started airing in September 1977) was one of his creations. That should have been enough time to get the show in better shape by the January 1978 episode we saw, but then again, shifting from a 30 minute to a 60 minute format is a big transition, one that requires a lot of filler scenes like Monica having a long flashback to a scene that must have only played out a few weeks earlier. 
    • I agree. She said, "I do," and then decided, "I don't." I wish Nikki Abbott had been a longer duration. I wholly prefer Nikki with Jack than I ever have with Victor, and today's episode proved that. And I never minded Ashley with Victor.
    • That one really bothered me. The chemistry was still very much there and then she married Jack and immediately ran off to find Victor. It was such a slap in the face to anyone that was a fan of the pairing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy