Jump to content

B&B: How Would You Revive the Show?


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

B&B should be rating a lot better than 3.1. I can definitely see DAYS passing them by the end of the year if Sheffer's SLs are that good.

My ideas:

Dump the writing team for a start. OK, it's Bradley Bell's baby, but maybe he could get a better team of assistant writers.

Characters I'd get rid of: Hector, Dante, Bridget, Jackie

Characters I'd put back on the frontburner: Sally and Clarke - Spectra is reformed to take on Forrester Creations.

Character I'd bring back: Deacon - he wants to spend more time with Hope, he and Felicia get together, for instance.

I'm a Brooke fan, but the whole show doesn't have to be just about her.

Keep Brooke/Nick together for now, but give them something else to do which doesn't involve Ridge.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Brad Bell *IS* the problem. I used to be a huge fan of him(I do think he's adorable in an aging frat guy kinda way) and his stuff at B&B, but he is majorly sucking ass in the writing department. I think Brad Bell should do a soap bible for an hour-long spinoff of Y&R and/or B&B and give the Writing Reins of B&B to someone more seasoned and talented. Hell, people hated Jack Smith at Y&R, but I think he would be better for B&B. Christian McLaughlin would be good also. He's campy, but I think seeing his work for SPYDER GAMES, he would be a great HW for B&B. With the plan previously mentioned, everyone wins. Brad can create his useless characters for his new show, and the fashionable clan of Forrester can be written by way of a different writer's pen.

Brad can 'save' B&B from getting into the gutter. He just needs to stop being lazy and start writing good, character driven material. With camp too! Have to have the camp!

Bridget should have committed suicide when Jennifer Finnigan left the show the first time around. Bridget's death could have provided Emmy Worthy material for everyone involved. Instead of that, we have Ashley Jones who a) was horribly miscast as Bridget and B) isn't a good actress to begin with. I'm all for getting rid of the rest of those characters.

I say death to Spectra. That would be ANOTHER repetitive storyline. Something I would like to see is another fashion house(a legitamet fashion house, not a knockoff) competing with Forrester, kind of in the same vein as Newman Enterprises and Jabot/Chancellor on Y&R. Maybe Jackie couldd start up one.

But keep Sally and Clarke! They are both great characters! Just no to Spectra Fashions.

And quit changing the character's backstories to suit a certain storyline! I admit I wasn't watching B&B until I came to college about 4 years ago, but the greatest thing about soap operas is that the backstories of characters can make for such interesting future storylines. Brad really missed the boat on the Donna storyline by not bringing up her past history as having posed nude or modeled for Spectra. I didn't mind the de-aging of the character, but the fact that she had no modeling experience and they made it seem like she was so out of touch with fashion was mind-boggling. Especially since she was in a love triangle with a model and her own sister, Katie. Character's histories make for GREAT storylines in the future. Brad could have so used all of this stuff to his advantage.

I don't see it changing anytime soon. If B&B loses to DAYS(Hogan)/AMC(rumored Armus) in the ratings, I hope Bill Jr. has the sense to upseat his brother from the Head-Writer's chair at the show.

I still watch the show everyday and enjoy it, but Brad is wasting so much potential at B&B! "The half-hour format" excuse is done and over with. There are no excuses. The stories suck!

  • Members
Posted

What the HELL is going on with Bridget/Dante/Felicia. I saw today and he and Bridget are over and he realizes he loves Felicia. WTF? When did this happen and why? Are they supposed to be the new Brooke/Ridge/Taylor bc its only lasted a few months and already running in circles

  • Members
Posted

I'd drop the love triangle stories for the time being. It seems like they rule the show. I would change Nick's attitude so that he isn't thinking about how Ridge/Steph are plotting about Brooke 24/7. That's getting old.

I'd probably get rid of Bridget. I liked Bridget up until she started liking Nick but since then I haven't cared for her. Seems like every story that she's been in since then has been some triangle. I'd also bring back Spectra to challenge Forrester. Jackie works in fashion, maybe she could team up with Sally to give Forrester a fight. I'd like to see a villian, or just an antagonist besides Brooke/Donna. I remember somebody mentioning that Eric's wealthy brother should come to town and stir up some trouble. That sounds like it could be interesting to me. And just IMO, if the only thing they are going to have Felicia do is pine after Dante, they should have just killed her off when they had the chance.

I'm not sure about Bell himself. He can write good stories, he just can't always. Maybe he needs some better assistant writers to help his ideas along.

  • Members
Posted

The show needs focus. It needs to a writer who can pitch ideas that have arcs and longevity. I am talking like a two year pitch. I swear they are flying by the seat of their pants over there.

  • Members
Posted

I think that just depends on the story. One of the things I like about B&B is how fast it moves. And some stories definentely move faster than others, and some take more time developing than others. Obviously the kill-off Darla thing seemed like a flying by the seat of their pants thing. I think it pretty much was. It happened so suddenly and I don't think it had much of an impact overall.

  • Administrator
Posted

Brad Bell doesn't do 2 year pitches, heck he doesn't even do 1 year pitches! I'm going to guess he only thinks 3-6 months ahead. That's why so many characters come and go. He just doesn't know what to do.

Brad only has two associates right now, Michael Minnis and Elizabeth Snyder, with Jerry Birn consulting. Brad has Patrick Mulcahey, who's a script writing God, but I think he should also be an associate to help with the stories.

I would love to see B&B fall down to 3rd or 4th. Maybe that way, Brad will get some help and change his ways.

  • Members
Posted

I don't think the show needs reviving... I think it is perfect the way it is. The only imperfections IMO are Nick and the new Phoebe, but she won't be a problem for much longer.

  • Members
Posted

I'd find a writer who can be true to the history of the show, one who doesn't rewrite history . I'd get rid of Taylor, Dante, Felicia, Donna, and Bridget. I'd also bring back Sally and Clarke, this show needs a little humor. I'd let Brooke be happy with Nick. I'd also give Stephanie back her backbone, and give her more conflict with Brooke.

  • Members
Posted

Sheila's return could add some definite excitement to the show. However, she should not be lurking in the shadows like during her previous returns. Sheila must come back, reveal herself to all and attempt to start life anew in L.A. as a good person while evil Sheila constantly threatens to emerge. There is much left unfinished between : Sheila and Taylor. Sheila and Brooke. Sheila and Stephanie. So much history, to this day nobody knows that Sheila tampered with Bridget's paternity tests...

  • Members
Posted

I thought Pat Mulcahey wasn't doing anymore work for B&B? Anyway, B&B is beneath him. They doesn't deserve him. His work on the show was so fantastic last summer, and as much as I'd like for him to stay, Brad will never allow his show to be intelligent or on the level that Y&R's sister show needs to be. Even with a fantastic scriptwriter, there is only so much that they can do. Even the best script can't save shitty story ideas!

I don't WANT to see B&B lose its spot of #2, but it is SO likely to happen if Brad doesn't change his [!@#$%^&*]. And fast!

  • Members
Posted

Interesting characters and a few popular actors....

Stories that catch someone's attention immediately.

I turned it on when GH started getting bad - which has been bad for a long time.

I couldn't get into it. I tried.... But nothing drew me in, and I didn't give it much time.

So they need stories to catch someone's attention and hold it. imho

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Creatively, he probably should have stayed with The Doctors, where he stood out as an antihero lead. Not sure what happened with GH. He didn't have the same impact. Was it bad writing, not clicking with co-stars? Didn't they gave him a boat load of money to join GH in 1976? Was Mark Dante just a toned-down version of Nick Bellini? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy