Jump to content

ALL: With BTG garnering so much attention, should the other networks jump on board the Daytime Train


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This was how Swedish soaps used to run - a fall season and a winter/spring season. Break for summer / Christmas, cliffhangers for each run. That was great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Of course it was "the little soap that could" that began to try this. If you recall when PC was cancelled, they were in a dark period but there were several months left in the can out of the 6 months worth they had last taped. 

And I would point out the example of BOLD which takes only 18 minutes to consume 1 episode! (Obviously there are no other complimentary examples of today's BOLD to point to!!!)

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously, I can speak only for myself, but a daytime soap just isn't a daytime soap to me if it doesn't runs five days a week, 50-52 weeks per year.  I mean, I could go along with taping two episodes per day, so that the team has a six-month hiatus to rest and recharge, but I still would need to know it'll be there, every Monday through Friday, uninterrupted, with no hiatuses or breaks.  Of course, YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love for any soap to run year-round, I just don't think it's viable for a streaming or hypothetical revival show. So I'd split the difference and do it in arcs that have a solid 13-16 weeks and reasonably short hiatus periods.

I do think it's very important to replicate the cycle of soaps celebrating holidays, etc. onscreen 'live' along with the audience - Christmas, New Year's, etc. So I would try to make sure those arcs fall along most major holidays. That's a way to sort of replicate the same ongoing connectivity to the audience as a year-round show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are describing Emmerdale. They shoot interior scenes in Leeds and exterior scenes on the village set about 30 minutes away. Pulling off this kind of show hinges on a studio's proximity to rural areas and the ease/cost of shooting there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We desperately need more people like Sheila Ducksworth, who are passionate, positive, and know how to sell the value of producing daily soaps to corporate people. I will say had it not been for her, getting here would have likely not happened or would have taken much longer.

My hope is other executives like her step up - whether with networks or with streaming providers to sell through the idea of doing a new daily serial again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only soap I'd love to see come back from yesteryear would be Edge of Night, but only in half hour form like it was back in the day.

You could have a close knit circle of characters that are connected to all forms of the law rather it's on the right side or the wrong side of the law.   And no ultra wealthy families like the Whitney's unless they're written as being on the wrong side of the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From your lips to God's ears. Hear, hear!

I had started watching it... Loved it... Not only loved it... but got obsessed with it. Had a pause after binging more than 200 episodes and then just... got into other stuff. Your post is now making me think if I should restart where I left of somewhere in May 1980. And I agree that EON could work amazingly well even today in 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you about the 30 minute format and I always see people mention Edge of Night and I think that would be such a smart format to go with. They could craft a season long mystery for a set amount of episodes so if it doesn't work they can drop it, but still have resolution. 

I feel like that would be the best way for a streamer to go about it if they were to do a soap. The other one I'd consider is Dark Shadows just based on how strong it's legacy is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let’s also remember that CBS isn’t paying the entire production bill for BTG. P&G and the NAACP are also chipping in. This probably made it easier for CBS to green light the show. 

This type of partnership does add more cooks in the kitchen, but I think it’s a solid way to manage costs. It would be great if ABC went to P&G or another company to see if they can produce a similar partnership for daytime soap development. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed...a great format to have a twisty mystery that leads into another one (and as a viewer, if you not THAT into the current mystery, you could check in once in a while to keep up and wait for another good mastery.) They could also set it in a urban area with a mix of ethnicities and economic levels ( I think that is what BTG's is missing, a mix of different economic levels...and the setting is way too bland.  I think do think every soap needs a Spaulding or Whitney family..pulling the strings behind the scenes.. and what a great way to get rid of a problem actor or someone asking for too much money...kill em off or send them to jail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I would have a great idea for a new soap opera : NBC or ABC (or another network) would totally win it making a new soap opera whose action would happen...in the 80's ! Wouldn't it be fabulous and innovative for a soap in the 2020´s to use what longtime soaps fans love the most about the soaps : the kitsch aspect ! Imagine it : the characters would all be dressed up sophisticated, a lot of hair spray and strass. It would definitely be a hit IMO. Stories would use the old soap clichés of that golden era too and historical events of real life would serve sometimes.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy