Jump to content

ALL: Legacy children who were undervalued or underdeveloped


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Sticking with AMC, Charlie Brent. The show could never settle on who it wanted him to be and finally just gave up and wrote him out for good.

Tad's arrival probably threw a bit of a wrench on Charlie's development, as a teenage/young adult Charlie might have had some of the stories that Tad had if Tad had never existed. Charles Van Eman's version of Charlie seemed like an attempt to fill the void left by Tad during MEK's absence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well casting Christopher Lawford as Charlie didn't help. He was way too old.

Y&R is leading the pack here.

Reed Hellstrom, Scott Grainger, Fen Baldwin, Moses Winters, Charlie & Mattie Ashby, Noah Newman, Faith Newman, Allie Nguyen have all been SORASED to represent the next generation of core characters and all were written off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve Olson, Days. I'm still wondering just what went wrong in 1972 to abandon him and opt for SORASing Mike Horton and David Banning, which would cause a massive ripple effect and imbalance.

Devaluing Steve had the largest effect, but we can't also forget his female contemporary, Sandy Horton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Doug Marland, looking to the future gave Don Hughes a daughter Christina in 1986.By the 2000's she would have been available to step up to the plate to continue the Hughes legacy, but TPTB were more interested in creating new characters.

The same thing occurred earlier when Don's stepson Teddy'Ryder' Hughes was brought on but then dropped and forgotten when new writers/producers took over.

Meanwhile the Stewart family had Annie's  quads waiting in the wings but they never appeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, Steve's last appearance was in freaking 1979. And Stephen Schnetzer played him!

Being gone so damned long, the show should/could beg Schnetzer to come back - with a family in tow - or recast with said family and put a bit more focus on some Horton relatives. Steve would have a LOT to catch up upon with sister Julie, half-sister Hope, and his various nieces, nephews, and cousins, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guiding Light: Marah Lewis really should have been played more in the mid-2000's, but her existance was definitely backgrounded, due to the arrival of Tom Pelphrey's Jonathan. Kimberly J. Brown's return in 2006 really should have been the start of Marah's permanent return to Springfield, and really becoming the product of her parents; instead, the story was still for Jonathan. And I do believe in 2009, with the voided casting of Martha Madison, that Marah really would have been a character worth having on the canvas. Even Shayne Lewis was undervalued, despite the brilliance of Jeff Branson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He reminds me a lot of Lily from ATWT who also refused to be Lucinda heir. Lily didn't grow until Heather took over and became the business women Lucinda wanted her to be. She stopped being this soft flower and her thornes came out.

Chris was a goofball no matter who played him. Surprising because he was Bob and Kim son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with Nick is that he was aged way too quickly. I think Nick was only really 6 when he was aged to 16 and as usual the actor was older. Then he was married off quickly. It was all too fast and so he went into a holding pattern until the actor and character sort of became the same age..

Nick was born in 89 which should make him about 35 now. Nick was been portrayed as in his 30's for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • If the show was interested in tying in one of the three prime time specials in the 90s, the smarter choice probably would have been Night Sins from 1993. Night Sins was the ushering in of Titan Publishing, the first mentions of Kate Roberts coming in to run it, plus it had involved Jack retyping a manuscript he had found in the new house he and Jen moved into... which ended up being a thinly veiled story written by Kate about her dalliance with Bill Horton that produced Lucas. However, I doubt the writers were even thinking about the prime time episodes when deciding to name the manuscript One Stormy Night.  I also don't see Stephanie being the one that would be writing it.  The current actress playing Stephanie seems to play a more passive version of Stephanie vs the previous takes by Shayna and Shelley..imho. Javi is cute... much too good for Leo.  He can do so much better.
    • I might've gone after someone like Jed Allan, or even Donald May. Though they're very different.
    • Same.   Looking forward to seeing what I missed later.
    • Question for all: Who would have made a good Mike recast after Stewart departed?
    • I think they did. Again, it is not an either/or proposition for most of the audience so far. Most don't feel the need to stan one or reject the other.
    • KKL on Bold Live on May 1st. Details here  
    • I do wonder if the show realized that fans would take to Silk Press and Eva as much as we have?    To me, I think the core four was mostly used to get eyes on the show since all four were familiar performers in both daytime and primetime.   Of the four, I think Nicole is used most effectively where it doesn't look as though she's hogging airtime.  She works as a lead and as a talk to. Anita has been the most under utilized of the four, but I do have a feeling that might be changing once the Ted/Nicole/Eva/Silk Press Story goes back to support status. Of the four, I think Dani has been over-used.. but I do still see potential for the character.  I know some people think she's the modern day Erica Kane, but I don't see that.  Erica was a Have Not that became a Have while Dani is a Have by birth and has done nothing to have earned being a Have. Good cliffhanger.
    • LOL now this sells it for me!  I can't wait to watch later tonight!
    • I think this is a great observation.  I do wonder if some of that was down to how Nixon had started writing story and plot outlines.  By this point (maybe even by the mid 70s) many have discussed how she *didn't* write detailed story outlines anymore--the focus more was on a mood or theme and ABC simply allowed that because they trusted her at this stage (in her "memoir" I think even Megan McTavish talks about Nixon's writing in this way in the 90s and she basically seems to admit that it worked for Nixon.  But if Nixon wasn't in charge of the daily execution of these ideas...)
    • Ooooooo that was a soap reveal!!!   And we even got a brief Kat vs Eva fight.   OOoooo cliffhanger!!! Oh, yeah, I remember they had a cover story, but I find it interesting that it was just mentioned again today. I wonder could it be foreshadowing another twist coming up. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy