Jump to content

Y&R November 2023 Discussion Thread


Taoboi

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

This confirms Victoria really never Got to Hold Baby Eve!

the fact that the white is chick is wearng white while the black people are wearing black and the ginger is wearing Brown, is it some kind of underlying message or something???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members


Yesterday on B&B, they did flashbacks of Brooke and Ridge since they characters began, but wouldn't use any pics or footage of Ronn Moss. 
Katherine Kelly Lang said in an advance interview that there'd be old flashbacks of her early years with Ridge but only her part of those scenes and not Ronn's. 

Well .... when it aired yesterday, apparently they did the footage as KKL said; but

And they also used a pic of Patrick and Marty and photoshopped KKL in place of Susan Haskell.
 

 

Please register in order to view this content

 


So if they can do that then ...
Amelia Heinle and J.Eddie Peck were paired for a while on AMC and their characters Mia and Jake were engaged. 
It has been assumed that Y&R wouldn't/couldn't pay ABC for the rights to the footage. but what if ....

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ALL THIS.  I saw the B&B episode mentioned, I mean I thought it was effective enough.  You would think Y&R could do something on a similar scale with AH and JEP.

Also as mentioned above, I really wouldn't have a problem with flashbacks with a former actor in the role; e.g. Ronn Moss as Ridge on B&B.  As pointed out, Jensen Ackles as Eric on Days, now played by Greg Vaughan.  And in this case, if they used Heather Tom in flashbacks as Victoria.

What I don't know is, do they need the actor's permission, or have to pay them royalties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watching today’s classic I was just amazed at how full the place Ryan and Nina had dinner at was with extras. 

Nicholas being a child in 1993 but now a 50 year old man is hilarious.

It’s amazing how great the production values were back then.

Has it ever been explained the aversion to using music more like the kind in the 90’s. It doesn’t sound dated, it actually sounds dramatic.

Edited by Antoyne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
    • French fan summary Rusty took over Simon's job at Lewis Trucking after Simon transferred to Lewis Oil's North Carolina office to live near Jessie and Calla. I doubt they would bother following up a story for offscreen characters eg marriage and a baby.
    • I suspected that the performance with the reveal was the reason why the Ted actor got the axe and it looks like I was right. He wasn't really good at conveying what needed to be conveyed in those scenes. Claybon is at least slowly improving (but I agree that he still needs to work on his line delivery), but I do wonder what will happen when his big reveal is coming up. 
    • I've already asked this before, recently, but can anyone who watched those years more closely tell me if anything said about Jessie and Simon at the end of their profiles is accurate (about them marrying, naming a baby after Brandon/Lujack, etc.)?
    • Nicole is way too smart to not know she was carrying twins - she's a doctor! My guess is that Leslie did abort her baby out of fear, and as payback, stole Ted and Nicole's child (Eva), and stole Kat from another family to replace her in the hospital.
    • Those Soap Central profiles have a lot of incorrect info. According to SOD summaries and the Daytime Newsletter of the time,Tim left town for a new job and Pam reunited with the father of her baby and also departed Springfield.They did not marry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy