Jump to content

General Hospital: November 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Well, I was hoping someone would find Austin's body on the floor today & they didn't go there. And, there was so much Finn. But, it was an excellent day for Kraze fans! Blaze was SO glad to see Kristina when she showed up at the studio. Carly is wise to try to pin Nina down on what she is up to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is a bit ironic that Michael's treats to Nina would have wound up costing him money if Carly had accepted his loan offer.

Ned's instincts are correct not to trust him with the Australia deal, because only a twerp like Michael could wind up with a deficit in a blackmail scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Austin knew who was in that room. But, all we saw was a pair of black men's shoes as the shooter walked away. So we can eliminate women. Sorry John that lets out Betty. 

As a courtesy & not having anything to do with "Who Shot Austin?" we are now on Work Day 89 without a sighting of one Marcus Taggert, last seen sick, drunk & angry in an elevator. Where is the Taggert posse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It’s been at least two days in Port Charles since Austin was killed, based on the changing clothes and pacing. Nobody is missing this guy?  Not work? Not even a scene of Ava flashing back to their last conversation?

The way they are playing this is beyond strange. Zero continuation for 3 full days? It was the cliffhanger!

I don’t know what’s worse- seeing Finn all the time or having to hear all the characters talk about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Basic script work; if it hadn't been for Jane Elliot and Rena Sofer, it could've been for any random character.
    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that character-Ok I have an evil twin, possessed by the devil etc-at least it's something new to play. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Better than being a talk to. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy