Jump to content

Onscreen all the time and we liked it


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Thanks to @JAS0N47’s stats for DAYS, we can clearly see how often Macdonald Carey was onscreen, especially back in the show’s first decade.  He’s still very highly ranked all things considered and he has been dead since the early 1990’s.

When the casts were smaller, the shows played a lot of the same characters all the time.  I wonder if people felt like the balance was off back then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been watching clips of GH from 1977 on, and Genie Francis was just so good as the complex and perpetually confused teenager Laura. She never phoned anything in and rose to every challenge. She was a very gutsy actress, especially being that young. Of course, Genie is still a wonderful actress though she's very rarely given good material to work with anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven’t read the thread yet! I don’t believe anyone likes air hogs, eventually it will become irritating to watch, and mess up the flow of the storytelling. Too much of anything is badd!!! 

If the characters are actually popular, it works best to come up with a rotating schedule. And to tease their eventful appearance. I would teasing my fan fave on the Friday cliffhanger and they won’t show up until Wednesday.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The guiltiest of the guilty pleasures - Brooke Logan gets pregnant from her daughter's husband - Bold And Beautiful 2002. This was the year of the best cheap trash ever on screen till this day. It should be in the Louvre. The complete end of 2001 and 2002 in repeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It’s more nuanced for me.  While I do think if you have a large cast, everybody should be used.  But at the same time, some characters/actors just drive story and are compelling over decades.

I loved the ensemble nature of Curlee’s GL. But I also grew up under the star driven GH and never got sick of Robert, Anna, etc.  until Guza’s second run and the affair with Felicia, I could watch Luke 4 days a week and not get tired of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched most of Luke's first run (1978-84, IIRC) on YouTube and I could see why Tony Geary became such z star. Even after Luke's rape of Laura, I could understand why he was popular.

In the 1990s and beyond, I just don’t think Luke was as multifaceted or interesting by himself as Laura was. Also, I don't know if it was delayed burnout or complacency or what, but Tony Geary started doing what Maurice Benard now does - phoning it in on a regular basis. The Felicia affair also soured me on Luke, except he was mostly bearable in Genie's 2006-07 return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still loved him from the return until just after lucky died.  The truth for me is that he does his best work when he is with someone very grounded.  That’s part of what I loved about Labine, even if he hated it.  I prefer Laura, but I can’t stand her marriage to Kevin.  It’s just not working.

When you watch their earlier run, it’s pretty clear why both of them became stars.  It is comical to me when we get to Luke as mayor though.  Ridiculous.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I strongly suspect the same. Happens often.
    • Beth #1 being recast right before she and Eric come face to face was jarring.  We spent the first 50 episodes or so getting to know Beth and see her rapport with her kids, co worker, and even her mother in law. Her Beth seemed content with her kids and job as caterer, but you could tell she also had a faraway look that you just knew meant that she dreamed of what life would have been like had she and Eric gotten together.   Plus, she came across as someone that you could see eventually moving into more wealthy circles based on her demeanor.   Seeing Beth always looking off into space probably helped fuel Brooke's dreams of wealth because she saw how unfulfilled her mother was.  Once Beth was recast starting in episode 52, that whole vibe completely changed and Beth #2 seemed to almost like living the middle class life.. and that her Beth would feel ill at ease around wealth, etc.
    • I agree.  I've always chalked it up to the fact that DALLAS had been a pop culture phenomenon for many years and that viewers, including viewers who'd stop watching years before, were tuning in one last time to say goodbye. Also agree that it was interesting to see KL finish 27th for the week.  Any show doing that well after 12 seasons is a miracle, lol.
    • I don't know anything BTS, but your theory seems reasonable.
    • In comparison to Maurice Johnson, sure, but he's still... stiff AF. "Leaps and bounds" is a strong exaggeration as well. Watching him is like watching paint dry. I'd recast him next, ASAP.
    • Yes! Andre easily could have just been a hunk with no real depth (like Derek) but his character is rounding out very nicely.
    • They're contract; anyone in the opening is a contract player.
    • I was watching an episode last night and noticed that Pictionary is taped in Atlanta. It's just a walk for Chandler to the studios.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • my vote goes to Eden (Belle)! She single handed carried that show on her back !! Best family will probably be The Dingles! I have to say 2024-2025 was a mixed bag on all of them soaps ! But if I had to say which one would be the best I would give it to Emmerdale for Belle/Tom’s storyarc. It went on for too long but at least was written properly compared to others. But I do think Corrie will win best soap for Mason’s storyline  Best storyline… I wish it would be Belle and tom but the abuse story from Hollyoaks will take that 100%
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy