Jump to content

Facts of life Reboot


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Same here.  However, I can't blame the show's producers for that.  Charlotte Rae believed "the girls" had grown up and didn't need Mrs. G. around for advice like before.  (I, of course, disagree with the assessment, lol.)

 

 

Same here as well.  OTOH, I wouldn't have minded a spinoff where Jo, now married to Rick, balances her life as a newlywed with her continuing career as a teacher.  You'd have her "home life," with Rick, and maybe another married couple who are friends of theirs; and then you'd have her "work life," with several other teachers at the school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I haven't read through the whole thread, but I watched FOL from the beginning.  Did anyone else like some of the other girls that were on during the first season, before they thinned the herd for season 2?  I liked some of the original girls...especially Cindy.  They kind of got rid of a tomboy only to bring on Jo (I loved Jo, but it seemed like they got rid of one tomboy - Cindy - just to bring on Jo).  And Nancy was kind of a Blair-like character so I guess they decided they only needed one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was an episode where Blair was helping on a law case..and had to work with her former law professor.   Blair was the proto type for Elle Woods after all.

 

And Jo should have been in the proposed Eastland spin off as the Mrs G..

Not Blair 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I liked them all too. I can see why they cut who they did and kept who they did but I LOVED Cindy. Sue Anne was just kind of there but I liked her too. I can kind of understand the appeal of a new character, ala Jo, but we already had a tomboy in Cindy. Maybe they had too many blondes? (Sue Anne, Blair, Cindy)

 

I also thought Nancy/Felice Schacter was kind of screwed over the most. I do like they kept her around for a few years and the other girls popped in and out but it was still a little sad. Imagine how they felt as the other girls got the focus?

 

I do agree Nancy and Blair were similar. Blair was more selfish and bitchy though, at least in the very beginning. 

 

I really have grown to love the first season and what it could have been. I guess I get the idea to focus on just a few but I think it could have continued to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The only other girl I liked from S1 -- aside from Blair, Natalie and Tootie -- was Molly.  From what I understand, too, Linda Marsh and Margie Peters wanted to include Molly in the S2 retool; however, Molly Ringwald was busy with other projects, so Marsh & Peters had to settle for one or two guest appearances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Agreed. Blair never made sense to me as the Head of Eastland. Jo did. But it has grown on me over the years and it's kind of amusing and it IS sort of a 'Blair' thing to do. Buy the school and save it. I didn't like how the other girls really didn't care about it though.

 

I can see why. She had star all over her. Gee, whatever happened to Molly Ringwald

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

I was also irritated that when the girls came back much later in the series and it was all about how Jo felt left out. Lord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That, IMO, was a perfect opportunity for Tootie to explain how, even though she had friends at Eastland, she never felt like she really belonged at the school, since there were so few African-American students there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Good point. I could have seen earlier FOL going there, but not Head over Heels Facts of Life. Weird, I know. Although to be fair, it wouldn't really ring true because they always made it seem as if Tootie was entirely accepted and she seemed to love Eastland. But it would have been a good point to bring up. I thought it was weird she was so dismissive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

There's your answer.  They felt they had too many blondes.  Plus, Lisa Whelchel had made the biggest impression of the three.  Of course, when you play a "rich bitch" like Blair Warner, you can't help but make a strong impression, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

lol all true! I can see why they picked who they did. I liked Cindy and Nancy a lot though, but with Blair and Jo, they weren't "needed". I remember hearing how Felice felt like she got the short end, for whatever reason. I can't remember all the specifics. And in the end I think it was her who probably popped up the most during the Eastland years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think so, too.  It seemed like she was itching to do more grown-up performances.  Hence, those spate of heavy, gripping made-for-TV flicks, like "The Nancy Thurman Story."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Garneau was in the Liberal party and his riding was in Montreal. He was the first Canadian in outer space.
    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy