Jump to content

February 20-24, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I give you Drake Hogestyn as John and even Deidre Hall can be inconsistant at times but when she is on I would put her up against any of the best from the other shows. Drake is not a great actor but he has presence and he makes the material he is given believable most of the time.

But as to the talent, I would put Judi Evans, Peter Reckell, Kristian Alfonso, Matthew Ashford, Peggy McCay, Frances Reid, Suzanne Rogers, Melissa Reeves, Billy Warlock, Martha Madison, Alison Sweeney and James Reynolds up against any of the performers on any soap any day. These performes get a lot of air time (except for Matthew Ashford who is offscreen right now) and they are among the most talented actors on daytime television. Those performers consistantly give 100% to the material they are given.

There are some weak links and sadly some of them are in high profile stories. Jason Cook can be very inconsistent; same for Kyle Brandt; and definitely Drake as I mentioned above.

But they are no worse than Justin Bruening on AMC, Chriselle (sorry can't remember her full name) on AMC who can be good one day and then be so off; Alec Musser, Aidan Turner and James Scott look good but are not that strong of actors; the guy who plays Duke on OLTL; the girl who plays Adriana is very inconsistant too on OLTL; the actress who plays Layla on OLTL can be very inconsistant; Melissa Archer even has many off days and weaknesses; Kamar on OLTL can too; Natalia Livingston on GH and I could go on with the examples just from the shows I watch or have frequently watched but won't.

The thing is every show has strong actors and weak actors. The Days cast has been delivering strong solid performances for almost a year now, and even some of the actors who have been really bad in the past have gotten better. There are some taht I wish they would replace, but I can say that about all the shows I watch.

Days of Our Lives gets a bad rap constantly. And many times they are judged on things in the past when they weren't that good, but the show is getting better and so is the cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great post Steve-you forgot to add Renee Jones to that list and Christie Clark is pretty good too.

I won't comment any further because I have already been way too fired up this week in this thread and in others about this and other topics in regards to Days. Days and their fans really have to put up with alot of crap, more then any other show, and it really isn't fair since most of it is based on inconsistent viewing and because of hwat has happened in the past. Those that have watched this shwo everyday, espeically those that have watched for many years including during the 80's, know that this show has one of the bets casts in daytime and always has been. I want to thanks Ryan and everyone else who made that known in their posts because in the words of John Black "That's a fact." They aren't perfect and no they aren't the best in daytime but they are one of the best, despite having some inconsistent players and bad ones here and there just like everyone else. OK now I am done-people can beleive what they want I guess. Thanks everyone for trying :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a DAYS fan and have been for over 10 years, but hell, even I was chuckling at that one!

This thread has really shown the ridiculousness of how some DAYS fans classify "their own". There are DAYS fans, but then there are anti-DAYS DAYS fans (huh?), and then there are DAYS fans who are only care for one supercouple and therefore are supposedly anti-everything else on DAYS. Gimme a break. I'm a DAYS fan, but I don't feel the "abuse" of anti-DAYS DAYS fans or anti-DAYS soap fans because I can see crap for what it is and I can see quality for what it is. If "95%" of the DAYS fans disagree with my opinions, I won't lose any sleep over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah and they always go on and on until the next ratings thread. The only time it stops is when Days goes up or has a good week and most of these people don't even comment or call attention to the fact that Days did well. Oh well I am done here because its pointless-people beleive what they want. I thank everyone in this thread-especially Ryan for putting it so nicely-for making great points based on watching the show on a consistent basis. Good job to you all and all of us Days watchers-let's just enjoy it and not let others bother us :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You couldn't be MORE right.

DAYS is absolutely the most talked about and most popular soap on the internet...and I firmly believe outside of the net aswell.

The fact that DAYS was the 4th most searched television show on the internet, with not a single other soap cracking the Top 10, speaks VOLUMES about JUST how popular the show is and how underrated it actually is aswell!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly think DAYS has the best supporting female cast, although GL, ATWT, and Y&R have some great ones as well. Overall DAYS doesnt have the best cast IMO, but I definitely think DAYS has a good cast and close to the best, the one thing that that really lacks with DAYS cast is male leads, not many at ALL.

Very well said Ryan! ;)

Couldnt agree more Mitch, its obvious.

I have never met anyone in person/real life who watches B&B, GL, or OLTL to be honest. It almost always DAYS and GH, with AMC and PSNS not far behind with a few Y&R and ATWT thrown in there. Thats just from my experience though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Time to get out more ;) j/k

In recent memory, I met a couple girls at Best Buy who were huge OLTL fans (they loved RH's version of Todd)... I met a couple ladies at the YMCA as B&B was on and we started talking about it... I met 2 women while waiting to get my hair cut who were GL fans. So there ya go ;) But I totally admit, when I meet fellow soap fans, the No. 1 soap watched is DAYS, then AMC & GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think the DAYS cast is the problem as much as the dialogue. I find Days and Passions dialogue to be amateurish or campy. But that's just a matter of preference. I prefer the dialogue on ATWT. Some find that boring. I mention this because I think if you give Peggy McKay, Suzanne Rogers, Judi Evans, etc the type of meaty dialogue the ATWT actors get, they would be just as good as anyone on daytime. I've see this from them before. Judi seems to be playing a cartoon character now, but she is amazing, and I've been a fan for 23 years. There are some duds in every soap cast because of the casting department believing soap fans would rather see a sexy model learning to act than a still good looking great actor. This applies to all nine shows.

The networks also keep insisting on shorter and shorter scenes. I feel like we lose a lot of the effect of powerful scenes because you get 30 seconds then a cut to the next scene. In the 70s you'd get five or six minute scenes. You would watch one scene and truly get a sense of what character was all about. Today that same scene would be chopped into 7 mini scenes.

If we're going to rate best casts, we have to have some clear criteria, because the casts are a group of actors who are not responsible for the lame stories or bad dialogue or cheap production. They just take the scripts and try to make something out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well I did say the dialogue may have something to do with their acting. Whatever it is, it is stopping me from getting into the show. It seems like I'm watching Undressed, that soap that used to come on MTV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As usual Roger, I think you said it perfectly! I think DAYS biggest problem is their dialogue and their day to day writers for the most are subpar. I dont watch ATWT often, but when I do the dialogue is easily better than both NBC soaps and ABC soaps as well. I find it refreshing when I watch ATWT, the writing is just simply better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Bell soaps, B&B and Y&R: cannot watch. If I went by the last time I did I would have to give them both D- but I really don't think it counts when you're not a daily watcher.  DAYS: B+ (Now this is with the knowledge that for years I have given this show a D- because I've been a fan for too long to give it the F it deserved.) GH: A+ (With Korte driving this bus to me the show is so much better! IMO we just had the best NB in so many years I cannot count!) BTG: A solid (Things I love, a few I do not, nothing I hate, still find it in general remarkable.) As always, thanks for doing this thread. I count it. I always look for it & I always post. 
    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy