Jump to content

Josh Duggar: 12 year old Molestation charges Surface


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's kind of like saying a five year old cannot bully a three year old because neither really knows what bullying is, yet one kid is still able to exert power and control over another. You don't have to know what predatory behavior is to engage in it.

To say that because the law attaches an arbitrary age to consent anyone under that age cannot understand the concept of forcing someone to do something he or she does not want to do does not make sense to me.

American law deems 18 year olds able to vote and go to war but not purchase alcohol and this makes sense? Is every 18 year old truly capable of making decisions about laws? No. And there are plenty of adults way over 18 that are quite immature as well and incapable of making those decisions. On the flip side there are kids who are young in terms of age but older in terms of their actions. Age does not make people uniform in terms of their mental capacity, ability to reason, determination, etc.

I don't have a problem with wanting kids who show no remorse after bludgeoning their families or others to death locked up beyond the age of 25. People who accidentally kill someone or who are forced to kill in self defense may have trouble coping afterwards and some may never be the same again. It's kind of hard to imagine how someone who intentionally slashes her parents and younger siblings to death so she can be with her boyfriends will go on to be productive in society if she is ever able to see what she has done as heinous. But maybe proper rehabiliation programs address that. The punitive part of the judicial system is in need of a major overhaul which is unlikely since politicians have other priorities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have always thought the Duggar family to be very strange and deviant and the last week's events have exposed how sick they are.

Josh is scum, his actions speak for themselves. He's the very same guy who claimed that gays were dangerous to children while all the while he has molested a handful of them himself.

But let's not forget that many pedophiles are victims of sexual abuse themselves and who knows what Josh Duggar's history is.

Jim Bob and Michelle are the truly evil ones in this mess. They should be ashamed of themselves, favouring their sexually abusive son over his own sisters, their own children, among other victims. That's truly vile. Those girls were innocents and Jim Bob and Michelle let their son get away with it by covering up his crimes and smoothing things over with a "stern talking to" from a good 'ol boy state trooper and some manual labour with plenty of platitudes about God and how this has all brought them closer to God.

Bullsh*t. They're all terrible people and TLC should be shooting this show dead. If Here Comes Honey Boo Boo got the ax for June Shannon dating a pedophile, TLC has to cancel this show: otherwise they are glorifying sexual abuse. It's just disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So some Republican politican wants charges brought aganist the officer who released the police report. Even though she was within the law to do so.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-pakman2/republican-finally-demands-charges-in-duggar-case_b_7446010.html

Talk about skewed priorities. How about going after the man who admitted to molestion aganist young girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So true. As long as one makes the claim to be christian, they are able to say and do the most disgusting things in the name of their religion. It's sad and pathetic. Huckabee needs to sit his big ass down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm floored. Literally. Sitting here with my mouth agape, at this NONSENSE...

Yes, according to Seewald, the only thing that keeps humanity from engaging in widespread and wanton child-rape is the fact that offenders might be punished — or a lack of molestable children.

Already we know that, under the Duggars’ philosophy, victims are taught to blame themselves — after all, they are at fault if they dress immodestly, or have “evil friends,” or if they expose themselves. Children who are abused are taught that it is OK not to go to the authorities, as long as they tell their pastors or God what happened. In fact, there “is no ‘victim'” at all, as it is godly to “suffer for righteousness.”

Josh Duggar has decided that God has forgiven him — an assertion that seems to be fine with many Christians, including Seewald.

I've come to the conclusion that christians get their god-loving rocks off on thinking they are better than other people.

How on Earth could a MOTHER allow her daughters to feel as if they are to blame for being victimized?!?! In what fuckin world does that make sense??

These people have become rich because they are prolific breeders and have never bonded with any of the offspring that they feel "god" meant for them to have. That's the only way I could understand a mother throwing her daughters (or any of her children for that matter) under the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And they've given us plenty. Sets, outdoor scenes, music licensing, etc. And that was the point of me using DAYS... so. It's obvious the casino set is not intended for long-term use, hence why it's likely it wasn't as evolved as the other community sets, etc.
    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just had thought of how to save the Perkins family. (Inspired by Rituals) -- What if Marisa Perkins was Augusta Lockridge's sister? Fictionally, they could've both been local girls, one married rich and one married poor. Originally, I was going to suggest that Marisa be Sophia's sister, but then I realized Joe and Kelly would've been first cousins.  Of course, it would've truly inspired Sophia was if Rosa Andrade sister, with Rosa and Santana moving in to help CC raise the kids once Sophia disappeared.  While this could've avoided both gross CC and Santana affairs, the times were not right for a story about intersectional inequity.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxW5DLJLId/ Another World is my forever favorite soap opera. But it's finale is almost universally hated by its fans. What this is, is an edit where I've deleted everything I didn't like!!!
    • The Perkins family had potential to be a nice alternative to the more dysfunctional Capwells and wackier Lockridges... but I think a few factors did in the family. 1) Recasting of Joe Perkins 2) Bad casting of the Perkins Patriarch, and the one note writing for that character. 3) Lack of antagonistic interaction between the Capwells/Lockridges and Perkins.  (There was no awkwardness between Jade/Ted.. or CC disapproving of his son being friends with that Perkins girl, etc). 4) Wasting of Jade thus wasting the potential of the actress (which was realized on Days of Our Lives).  She had more potential than Laken oddly enough. The only member of the Perkins family that had appeal and a somewhat thought out story arc was Amy.  
    • @GymnastGuyThanks for posting the three new Capitol 1985 episodes today. The two labeled March 12, and 13 are misidentified. The March 12 labeled one actually aired November 12 1985 which I figured out because Kenny Rogers' movie Wild Horses aired November 12th and it was announced over the "March 12" Cap credits. In addition, Craig Carlson is listed in the April credits but not the March. Craig left Capitol sometime after July 1985 before he rejoined OLTL in the credits by October 15, 1985; he was replaced on Cap by Radcliffe and Hamner. In these posted episodes Radcliffe/Hamner names appear in the March 85 episodes but not in the April.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • 5-15   And now...back to the A plot. I can't say enough about how great this week has been that I've been enjoying the fallout from the SilkPress/Eva reveal. I can't believe that it's been almost a week, and it is STILL going on. And they are playing every beat. And rightfully so. It's a strength to the story that this episode is full of mostly those beats with one (okay 2) C plots. I loved how this episode seem centered on dealing with the Bill of it all from his reactions to the reactions of the ones who actually care about him. And meanwhile, Kat getting a clue and connecting it back to the plot thread of Laura's accident.    Game recognizes game. My way of saying I loved Bill vs Silk Press Sheila. They have great adversarial chemistry. And I loved that Bill not only gave the heads-up to NuTed, but already figured out that Ted had paid her off. A dumbed-down villain Bill definitely is not. And awww at Naomi walking in on him and NuTed. lol. Like father, like daughter cuz they both stay reading people. Also loved the scene of Naomi and Chels together discussing their feelings about their father in light of the reveal.    It's so sad to see Kat thinking in the right direction and STILL took a wrong turn. That said...great to see the Laura plot thread picked up and Kat moving to get to the bottom of it. It's just sad that her strong disdain toward Eva is blinding her to the real threat. Makes her easy prey for SilkPress to manipulate and harder for Eva to get acceptance if people still think she's up to no good. Also intensifies their rivalry. Kat vs Silk Press Sheila was reaaallly good, too. The direction. The camera angles. The lines. Even got background music.

      Please register in order to view this content

      And...HAHAHA I love how SilkPress Sheila reacts to the word 'crazy' the same way Sheila herself reacts to the word 'bitca' right before one of her catfights on B&B. Honorable mention to another SilkPress vs Eva scene where Eva avoids the gaslight and that Andre/Eva scene where he continues to be there for her.    And speaking of the reveal...now that I've seen the full episode...I've warmed to NuTed a bit. I thought in the brief scene I saw on my busy Thursday that he did what I love when a role gets recast. The actor uses some of the mannerisms of their predecessers, but not do a complete parroting of them. And that I felt he pulled off well. It allows for the actor to slowly enter their own vibe to a role and make it their own. And so far...I felt Keith was still...Ted. Love the scenes with NuTed/Kat. But time will tell if I feel he will make it his own.   The only good thing I can say about that Andre/Ashley scene...they both have gotten comfortable in their roles, and it was nice to see. I'm Team Dani/Andre over here. That said...I actually am loving the C plot of Ashley, Derek, and the apartment because they are finally getting drama. And I'm actually Team Derek though I completely understand where Ashley is coming from. Thankful that we got that phone call with her mother for her POV and background life. She really is not used to living with someone and what that is like. And it's relatable. But she's handling it all the wrong way. As for their overall place on the canvas though, I can't help, but think about what I said in the first week...they are just meta to me...getting the development...or lack thereof...that black characters get on other soaps...just in reverse.    Awww at June saying that she just finds the picture lovely. I don't completely believe her hehe, but it was nice.    The anvils about Eva's birthday...smh. lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy