Jump to content

Y&R: Peter Bergman interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The first paragraph is nothing but asskissing. Logan is as phony as ever.

Disgusting.

Given that Pratt hasn't even brought a ratings increase, it tells you just how creatively bankrupt and apathetic Sony and CBS are to let this trash air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like I said before…they fired the hack Jean Passanante who did the same story with Cassie to hire another hack probably for more money to do the same story with the same contract players….just awful. This is what Angela was pimping on Twitter the other day….gawd…this woman needs to be fired too!!

Shame on Peter Bergman!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For hyping this [!@#$%^&*] of a story! At least Eric Braeden in an early interview said the writing didn't make sense…kind of trashed it but then said it worked….he was playing both sides but at least he admitted to how the story made no sense…LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ratings only went up the first week of his material….and a few little jumps throughout but lately the ratings have flattened and I hope they drop for this dreadful storyline. Maybe then they will fire Pratt and hire Bell to finish off what his dad started.

Now I really do believe that B&B will be the last soap standing when all the dust is gone and settled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think PB feels compelled to 'sell' this storyline knowing that future opportunities (opportunities for what though??) for his character may be on the line. Like one poster alluded to, he has bills to pay and opportunities may not be easy to come by, especially for entrenched soap actors these days.

However, I don't believe he's enthusiastic about this dumb storyline, anymore than I believe Sharon Case is gungho about many of the idiotic storylines she's been shoved into over the past 5-6 years. These actors know that 'playing their part' goes beyond playing the character onscreen-- it extends to interviews and promotions and meet and greets where they must sell the role, their current storyline and the show. I get the sense that they'd rather endure a bad storyline that endure backburner status. But I'm not buying all this enthusiasm.

Boy, I miss my ATWT! When an actor thought a story was poo-poo, they'd say it was poo-poo! Some were more diplomatic than others but you could never mistake their comments for any type of enthusiasm for a horrible storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy