Jump to content

February 13-17, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have to disagree. AMC rarely does a big sweeps event like this. Something like this is so rare that when they do do it, it comes out well and it makes for great television. I cant see how AMC fans can get tired of the disaster sls bc we dont get many. On the otherhand, a show like GH does one every few months, and yes I do get sick of those every time bc its nothing but a ratings grabber. I didnt feel such was the case here bc it fit in wonderfully with the story and didnt seem contrived at all. Plus most of the stories climaxed and came to a head. I know I have been fascinated by what I've seen onscreen and AMC has been on a roll long before the explosion and still doing pretty good onscreen since it happened. Of course thats just my opinion, but I really do think its the most entertaining soap on tv at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree Cheap. AMC usually sticks to the family traditional climaxes for sweeps like when a big reveal come out like the Surrogacey storyline with Greenlee and Kendell or When Greenlee revealed that she was Jacks daughter at Erica's wedding.

AMC doesn't do this kind of stuff normally they usually stick to family issues and stuff like that not explosions and gunshots and spontaneous fires and epidemics like GH. Even thou GH does them well storywise it's obvious it's only for sweeps and then it goes back to the sonny show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That might be the case but AMC does do them occassionally. The thing that is happening right now is that it is overkill so much in the genre and AMC is suffering from the overkill. Because GH does them so much and most people who watch AMC also watch the other ABC shows, they have seen it too much. GH just had the big hotel fire recently, then the train wreck, now the epidemic, and at the same time OLTL was gearing up for the plane crash. Right in the middle of all of it AMC pulls the explosion. It is overkill. Like you said AMC only does these occassionally. The last time was at a the Crystal Ball I think several years ago. This also goes to the point that I was making a couple of days back about AMC. The show used to be unique and it had its own pattern of doing things. They are losing that uniqueness and becoming just like all the other shows. Even pulling out a big event like this for sweeps just like GH does. The show did use to focus on family oriented drama for sweeps and for everyday. They use to have socially relevant stories which hardly any other soap did on a regular basis. But that show is no more. It's key thing now is to be entertaining no matter what the cost and to get the rating point - screw the rest. I want my old AMC back.

I did not watch any of the explosion after half way through Tuesdays show. That was the last day I have watched AMC and probably will for be that way for awhile. But I have yet to see the reason for doing this. The few things that progressed in the storyline could have been accomplished in many other ways. There just was no real reason to do it other than to maybe grab someone's attention which obviously it didn't do or if it did it definitely didn't keep them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One reason for this "sameness", I believe, is ABC Daytime President Brian Frons. In my opinion, ABC Daytime as a whole has become interchangable ever since Frons took over. During the Frons Era, the soap population dropped by one with the cancellation of "Port Charles" and its timeslot going back to the affiliates. Another hallmark of Frons is the revolving door that seems to exist at the ABC soaps. PC refugees Julie Hanan Carruthers moved to AMC; GH rehired their old writers; AMC became the latest soap to hire Megan McTavish; DAYS reject Dena Higley moved to OLTL. The constant recycling of writers and producers from one soap to another is not healthy. Even the opening credits of the three ABC soaps - which all changed since Frons took over - are similar and interchangable as well.

In todays television environment - especially daytime - the status quo, which Frons seems to adhering to, isn't accomplishing anything. I did note that in January, prior to the (literally) Disaster of February sweeps, that all three ABC soaps posted half-a-point declines from the same period one year earlier. Wonder why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy