May 30, 201411 yr Member According to Michael Bruno on SoapBox DT was the last to know and Bruno said many at Y&R knew he was being replaced before he did. What [!@#$%^&*][!@#$%^&*] Edited May 30, 201411 yr by John
May 30, 201411 yr Member Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Billy supposed to be younger than Kelly, Stitch and Victoria?
May 30, 201411 yr Member Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Billy supposed to be younger than Kelly, Stitch and Victoria? Yes, there is no way being older than Kelly is the real reason he was let go. NO way.
May 30, 201411 yr Member IA. I don't buy the he-looked-too-young rationale either. Billy Miller looked too damn young next to Cynthia Watros, too. I just keep coming back to the same conclusion: DT was fired, b/c SONY won't budge on Billy and Victoria as end-game. Edited May 30, 201411 yr by Khan
May 30, 201411 yr Member According to Michael Bruno on SoapBox DT was the last to know and Bruno said many at Y&R knew he was being replaced before he did. What [!@#$%^&*][!@#$%^&*] Ew at Michael Bruno.
May 30, 201411 yr Member "Same" about Bruno, Carl, lol. But it wouldn't surprise me if DT actually was the last one at Y&R to know about his firing. The poor lad never stood a chance.
May 30, 201411 yr Member "Same" about Bruno, Carl, lol. But it wouldn't surprise me if DT actually was the last one at Y&R to know about his firing. The poor lad never stood a chance. I believe Bruno reps AH but even Bruno said that something to the affect that YR could have had more class when letting DT go and that he should have been the FIRST to know.
May 30, 201411 yr Member Y'all are insane. They were never going to recast Victoria in this situation. Villy is obviously endgame. DT and AH didn't work. Recasting Victoria would mean BOTH halves of this couple would be a recast and they were never going to do that. Not saying I agree with the firing but the idea that AH should have been fired to make Villy work is just plain ludicrous. Fans have a hard enough time accepting one half of a couple being recast. To recast Vic with someone who has chemistry with DT, who is ALSO a recast, would never in a million years happen. I'm not sure that Bacteria worked that well with Miller around either. Casting roles based solely on how they fit a prefab couple is a bad idea. I imagine Gina Tognoni will not mesh well with the perpetual frat boy Morrow, so if "Phick" fans start demanding her firing, will the show cave?
May 30, 201411 yr Author Member Bacteria didn't work on Y&R I agree. Their initial coupling was interesting, but their storylines were always such a downer. A lot of baby drama and strife. That's why I can't believe the first story this new regime is doing is ANOTHER baby story for Victoria.
May 30, 201411 yr Member Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Billy supposed to be younger than Kelly, Stitch and Victoria? Yeah by 10 years
May 30, 201411 yr Member I'm not sure that Bacteria worked that well with Miller around either. Casting roles based solely on how they fit a prefab couple is a bad idea. I imagine Gina Tognoni will not mesh well with the perpetual frat boy Morrow, so if "Phick" fans start demanding her firing, will the show cave? Wouldn't be surprised same goes for the new Adam
May 30, 201411 yr Author Member So what happens if JT or Mac ever return? How can Mac be Billy's high school sweetheart if he's so much older than her? And this new guy not only is in his 40s, but he looks old. The old Mac they could bring back is Clementine Ford because she looked so old.
May 30, 201411 yr Author Member I agree. I don't see him being the big savior, but much like Steve Burton, they will try whatever it takes to make him happen for as long as he's around.
May 30, 201411 yr Member This new one now looks 10 years older than the age group he's supposed to fit in, and 20 years older than DT, IMO.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.