Jump to content

Duck Dynasty brouhaha


alphanguy74

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yep... very true, and like I've said many times, if you want complete freedom in what you say on social media, etc.. work for your damn self. I say and do what I want, and I always say "What are you gonna do? Call my boss and have me fired?" LOL I saw one of the guys who worked for me in the past posted big support for the Phil character. He since moved away, but I defriended him, and if he moved back, I wouldn't use him again. And that's my decision, nobody else's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I just want to make it clear that banning Phil Roberson is not my main objection. (He certainly does not deserve a television show, but I'd like to see Duck Dynasty continue for a few months so that it would damage A&E.) If A&E banned him immediately and then issued an apology for ever airing his program in the first place, that would suffice. But it's the insincerity whereby A&E acknowledges no wrongdoing and makes a half-assed apology tantamount to "Robertson's statements don't reflect our corporate values" that really irritates me. Obviously, this is on a much lesser scale of severity, but I hate it when--after cancelling a soap (which a network has every right to do)--a network then makes a bogus statement on how much they cherish that show and its viewers. Just tell the truth, and admit that the soap was cancelled for business reasons.

The whole hypocrisy over free speech--on both the part of many conservatives and many liberals--really bothers me. Liberals find hate speech so loathsome, and many seem less receptive to the argument that the First Amendment protects hate speech. Yet regarding the things that conservatives hate equally as much--things like flag burning and extremist Muslims expressing their own views--I hear so few conservatives say that such actions are protected by the First Amendment. (I am overgeneralizing about liberals and conservatives in order to make my point, but I think that it simply cannot be denied that free speech hypocrisy exists on both sides. Of course, there are many conservatives who abhor hate speech, as well as many liberals who detest flag burning and the sentiments expressed by extreme Muslims.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just found out that A&E is playing a 35-hour Duck Dynasty marathon, which is so hypocritical. Regardless of how I feel, A&E has the right to do what it wants, but the network is just playing to both sides by banning Robertson and then running a marathon of his show. Cracker Barrel seems to be similar, first announcing that they would stop carrying Duck Dynasty products and then reversing said decision.

Companies can either stand with the Robertsons or stand against them, but they can't do both, or it just looks like all they stand for is making money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just making a point that this is what a A&E should do (if it had a conscience). Of course I'm totally aware that the real world doesn't work this way.

Marceline, I don't know how you specifically are feeling about this, but I would imagine that A&E's decision to run a 35-hour Duck Dynasty marathon is irritating a lot of people (who support the immediate ban of Robertson). As a result of this latest action, I am uncertain if A&E is fully pleasing anyone. (But the flip side is that the network is also taking steps not to fully upset anyone, thereby minimizing fallout from a bad situation.)

My best guess as to Cracker Barrel's "thought process" was that they initially banned the Duck Dynasty products over the outrage caused by Robertson's comments, but reversed course because there was an unexpectedly large "I Stand With Phil" movement (that's more prevalent in the areas in which the restaurant does business).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They only banned the products that had Phil on them.

Keep in mind that Cracker Barrel has faced accusations and I think lawsuits over racism and homophobia. So this was lip service to that.

What I want to know is how many of those people standing with put-upon millionaire Phil are going to boycott buying those products and boycott watching the show. If they don't, then they're hypocrites, because most of that money is going to A&E.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meanwhile Sarah Palin's daughter seems to happily slam the gay community as a whole, not even pretending to say that only some people even noticed or cared about his comments. I wonder if she's still bitter because her homophobic behavior on her TV show got her bad press and bad ratings.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/bristol-palin-slams-hypocritical-gay-community-duck-dynasty-flap-article-1.1556893

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish I was surprised.

I read the comments at the Hollywood Reporter article on this and they were incredibly, incredibly ugly, homophobic trash. It made me feel sick. This is the audience for Duck Dynasty. Bigots and hatemongers and proud of it.

I think A&E just did this so they could say they tried. They likely always planned to back down. Meanwhile, they've made money hand-over-fist from all the people who rushed to buy their products to support Phil Robertson.

A&E is cynical and hollow, and all those dumbass [!@#$%^&*] for brains out there actually think they taught A&E a lesson. Yeah, you taught them a lesson in how to make sure their executives can buy another summer home.

A&E, the "liberal" media (which almost exclusively covered the anti-gay comments only, not the racist comments), and this family have set up a very dangerous environment for gay people and black people, and emboldened bigots, racists, and homophobes. We will hear all about the backlash for "family values" and see this used against blacks and gay people in the media, in politics, everywhere. This will have a chilling effect.

I will never watch anything on A&E again. Ever. I'm sure they don't care. I'm just one viewer. That's fine. They can kiss my ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Make that two viewers. Supposedly the rest of the family vowed to bolt if they didnt reinstate the dumb racist moron back in the show..and A&E caved....I guess they care more about money than anything else....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl, I'm sorry this made you so upset. I hope you guys plan to communicate this to A & E. Your lack of viewership won't make a difference, but they need to know how you feel. Don't let them get away with this!

I will support your cause. I will not watch anything on A & E again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think they care, but I know what you're saying and I might drop them a line someday. Thank you for your support and for reading all that crap I wrote.

It's not so much this bigot family that upsets me, it's more the power they have, what they represent, and how this is going to hurt so many people in the industry and out of the industry who are already at the bottom of the ladder.

I am embarrassed for people who respond to remarks about how black people were only happy while hoeing cotton and decide this means the person who is saying them is a hero and needs to have endless boycotts in his name. I am frightened by this mentality, and how widespread it is. I feel like people are looking for someone to help justify their own bigotry.

I also hate how much time is spent on how the media has been taught a lesson, or A&E has been taught a lesson. That's BS. They've been taught the lesson of big bills stuffed in their g-strings. The only people who will suffer from this are people who are already suffering, and the media does not care about them, not now, not ever.

The thought of what will come after this and how this will empower hate groups is what bothers me the most.

I was reading some of this man's sick comments about women. This is an American hero, apparently.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-five-jawdropping-moments-from-his-sermons-20131220,0,4783746.story#axzz2ohLtubT7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really shocked at this turn of events. On the one hand, I had no idea what or who Duck Dynasty was before this, so I doubt this guy is influencing anyone other than his own, if you know what I mean. On the other hand, it's disturbing that A&E is giving this guy a platform. Overall, I mostly think that this type of ignorance has always existed and it always will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the other hand, I still find episodes of TV with people smoking in front of babies shocks me into nervous giggles.
    • Word of advice... you have to view the show without the 2025 lenses.. which means you need to 86 the misandry.
    • i love reading other posters alternate takes and scenarios. Yours would have really upped the tension.
    • Amanda is not my cup of tea. That's all I'm gonna say. She's repetitive and childish. She acts like a brat with her parents and has this constant "I'm not satisfied or happy" look on her face. The actress is okay in my opinion. I'm not impressed by anything I've seen her do so far. But she's okay.  BUT Amanda's repetitive scenes with Sam are the ones that I want to fast-forward the most. They just have 2  topics they like to talk about... and it's always "You are infringing on my right to be a powerful career woman! I need to be outside dating men for a job, so I can WORK and prove I'M NOT A RICH GIRL ONLY!" and he's like "You and your family are buying me a career and I don't want it! I WANT TO BE ABLE TO STRUGGLE and be poor and you guys ARE denying me the opportunity by giving it all on a silver platter" This is their main storyline for me... and it's just annoying when it's the same every single episode. It's a fake struggle that I don't buy. These people are so spoiled by this point and have everything... don't make me suffer listening to them bicker how amazing their life is, so they are unhappy about that. Just a personal view. I'm not saying THIS IS the situation. My view is also restricted, since I'm only 4-5 months into the episodes. 
    • It's shocking to see Steffy look down on anyone. She was the new generation HO for years. I mean... she was nasty and using sex to seduce married-engaged-in-relationship-men all the time. She was embracing it fully. Bradley was accenting on the fact that Taylor's daughter had become Brooke 2. I remember how disgusting it was when she was using Hope's virginity to her advantage and offering to f-ck the guys that wanted Hope. It was ABSURDLY nasty.  Then couple of years ago Bradley decided we should forget about it and made Steffy BECOME her grandmother. IN AN INSTANT. There was no build up to it. Which aged the f-ck out the character and made her unbearable. Because it's one thing to see an actual matriarch, older woman doing these things, being a moral judge... but it's complete joke to see the ex-ho acting like this. Ex-ho that is still incredibly young and has no right acting like she is better that anyone or... a moral JUDGE. Steffy and Hope's personalities got swapped!!! That's the irony of it. So any time these gang-style of fans come attacking Hope... for acting like a "slut"... I pinch myself - their HEROINE Steffy was doing this HARCORE. Are these people oblivious or just pretending not to remember. How can you stan a moral judge... that attacks "sluts" and also stan the same type of behavior you are attacking... years ago. How does this happen. But I repeat myself at this point.  I agree with everything you said 100000 percent. It's the truth. At least in my eyes. 
    • The Amanda pregnancy was a blunder. Amanda and Sam were AW's best bet for a starcrossed supercouple. Young love destined to be turn apart by outside forces and misunderstandings . Battling for years to finally get together. Instead AW had them married and pregnant within a year.  
    • It is his fatal flaw.  He's smart, cute, and loyal.  But, a total chauvinist pig.  We're looking through a 2025 lens, but April's from a wealthy family, (that she recently met), she should be allowed to contribute to her own home. Especially if Draper is going to work for the Crime Commission, rather than joining Mike's private law firm (did I get that part correct?) How about smoking while the baby is in the room?  It all looks nuts by current standards. Raven was married to Geraldine's son Kevin, but had an affair with Logan (whom Geraldine also considered like a son). Raven got pregnant by Logan, then Kevin died (long story short).  The part you need to know is that Raven was bored being a mother to Jamey (check out my member name).  So, she starts going out to Elliott's club and leaving Jamey with April.  Logan is not happy that Raven keeps leaving their baby all around town.  And thus, Geraldine is not pleased with Raven either. Draper and Logan are frequently rivals in the courtroom.  FYI --- Draper is also Raven's step-brother (her mother married his father). Raven's real name is Charlotte. But, one day [she] was sitting on the lawn and saw this beautiful black bird with shiny wings fly by. [She] wanted to be that bird. So beautiful. So free. With beautiful black wings…"    @chrisml you'll hear that story soon, and I envy you getting to see it the first time.
    • There is a time... till the old storyline is cleaning up... where it's still kinda annoying. For me it was. That's a personal opinion. But in 10-20 episodes more... you'll find yourself enthralled. It's not even begun. I'm so glad to hear your reviews! And excited of what's to come for you! 
    • Carly also has Nikki (Nicholas) with Lawrence. The easiest way to remember Chelsea is to think about how she was buried, stillborn, premature in a swamp and came back to life.  Or you can just remember her running over Bo/Hope's kid Zack.  Kind of ballsy to name her kid Issac if you ask me lol.
    • That's right Anita! Let her have it!

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy