Jump to content

HBO's Looking


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members

comedy about three thirty-something friends living in San Francisco who grapple with all the options in contemporary life and the complexities of the modern gay experience-Futon Critic

Season one will consist of 8 episodes that will start airing on HBO in early 2014

Stars Jonathan Groff, Frankie Alvarez, Russell Tovey, Scott Bakula,

Here are some production pics from Twitter & Instagram

jgroff-leather-main.png

groff-leather-lov1.png

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It seems to be being set up as a Girls for Gays. However, I have some hope--the cast isn't bad (Russell Tovey from Dr Who and the UK Being Human) Though Scott Bakula was someone I hadn't heard connected.

The main director--of the pilot and other key episodes is another Brit, Andrew Haigh who did the great UK gay film 2 years back, Weekend.

I largely hated the US/Canada remake of Queer as Folk, but I'm pretty surprised it's taken this long for cable to do another gay based drama (those cheap shows on Logo or whatever like Dante's Cove do *not* count.)

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I actually have high hopes for this. It has a pretty good production team and cast, and I appreciate that they're focusing on characters aged 30s to 40s. Like with Girls, there has been, probably fair, complaints about it being too white (though one male lead is Asian and another Latino,) but...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnGwmP8qg2c

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL yet you can't watch? It does have a bit too much of the hipster beard I guess (I say that while currently having a beard, but that's more that I've been too lazy to shave during essay/exam month tongue.png ), but that's undeniably the look of a lot of guys that age, now (particularly when I was in San Fran last Spring, I noticed it.)

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The main reason I'm annoyed by the lack of black cast members, is because for black gay people, we really have very little in terms of an on screen image. I would've loved a more diverse cast for something like this. That was the highlight of DTLA for me, the racially diverse cast. Oh well, I guess I will stick to Noah's Arc on Netflix! No interest in a gay version of Girls with the same issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show is far too white, sure. The Latino guys ticks the diversity box, and let's face it - the reality is that gay communities across the country are very racially segregated, even when we share the same social spaces.

I like that it's in SF and not NYC or LA. I've never been to SF, but it is our nation's most proudly gay city.

The facial hair IS the look right now and has been for a while. (And in the behind-the-scenes, the creatives all have beardage.) But that pornstache on a beautiful man like Murray Bartlett is a TRAGEDY and needs to be shaved off or he should go all in on a goatee or beard. Hopefully there's a character reason for his look.

I'll be watching in spite of myself. And looking forward to Russell Tovey (which autocorrected to "stovetop" on my phone) in a gay role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Girls thing seems like more the marketers (for one thing, it's a generation older.)

The main director, Haigh (who, as I mentioned, directed the great UK indie gay film Weekend) said this:

"Haigh: Whenever before a show goes on air, people want to define it. The easiest way for the media to define it is to say it’s a gay “Sex and the City, or a gay “Girls.” But I think the show is different from both of those shows. Different people, different ages. It’s out of our control, and I’m not embarrassed to be compared to those two shows. They’re both great shows. But I think ours is distinct in its tone and feeling. Our characters are in their 30s, coming up on mid 40. It’s a different age group than Girls for one thing.

Haigh: I think also because “Queer as Folk” came out in America, and ran for like five seasons, ages ago now. I think a lot of execs probably thought “We’ve done the gay show now. That’s been done. We don’t need to do something else.” Our show is very different from that show. It tells different stories from a different time and, not to negate Queer as Folk - I obsessively loved the British original myself so could never bring myself to watch the remake - but this show does not focus around issues particularly, even though they'll naturally come up."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I doubt it will be--the talent has already shown to have a different view of the world than Girls.

I found Noah's Ark disappointing, but not because the leads are (at least the early episodes I saw) all black. Ideally I'd love a more mixed show, in either case (and in the case of Ark, one with better acting and writing although it's not at the level of something wretched like Dante's Cover -- maybe I need to give it more episodes.)

Re race... I agree the race card is a difficult issue. There's no doubt that a tv show, even cable, is more comfortable casting white (and usually straight) leads. I mostly enjoy Girls, but what bugged about when people mentioned how white it was, was Lena's reaction to the question where she seemed to not even understand the critique. If she had just tried to understand the comment, and pointed out that this reflected her experience (growing up as a wealthy New York Jew, ) and then not turned it into a weird joke by immediately casting a black boyfriend for season 2 only tohave him quickly leave because he doesn't like her characters take on race, then I woulda been more ok with it.

One of the (many) ways the remake of Queer as Folk bugged me was they set out to make it more inclusive of the gay (and lesbian) community and failed (and notably had very little in the way of non-whites either) whereas Davies with his original series flat out said he was writing about these certain characters he recognized and knew of, and that was that. On a less serious note, re beards, as mentioned obviously this reflects the creators (Groff's character started off at a no end internet job in the late 90s in SF just like the writer, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I thought that the pilot was good and is the show marketed as a comedy? Is it because it's a 30 minute a week program? There were moments that I laughed, but in most of the scenes, I identified and saw what I've experienced in my and my friends lives.

I hate that this show has to be compared by some critics, reviewers and the general viewing audience to Girls, but this isn't anything like that show. I don't see a "Hannah" or any of that show's females (and males) in any of these characters.

Now, as for the diversity (or lack of it, according to some). Augustin is Cuban. His boyfriend is black. Patrick just "met cute" a hot, sweet and charming Hispanic guy on the bus. Augustin is one of the three leads on the series and he seems to be in love with his man. It also seems like cute barbershop guy will be seen throughout the series.

There was more diversity and different types of gay men shown in this pilot than what had been shown in the US version of Queer as Folk's entire five seasons (while supposedly set in Pittsburgh, PA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The pilot was pretty good. Looks like it could develop into something awesome. There were a lot of relatable moments & things that rung true. And some of the lines were truly hilarious.

I didn't see any problems with pacing, Chris. I don't know what would have constituted a better pace. Within one episode they set up stories, we saw a journey for each of the three leads, and a climax that is meant to lead to more drama down the road.

I would like them to adjust the tone a little bit. It's a little too somber/serious for a show that bills itself as comedy/drama and therefore it works against all the scenes that are supposed to be lighthearted chatter and funny. Other than that, I didn't see any issues.

I thought the acting was excellent. All three main actors, as well as the guest stars, did amazing work.

All this brouhaha made over diversity and, in the end, out of the 5 guys we see, 3 of them were non-white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Does anyone have a casting choice in mind for Sharon ? I'd totally love to see Anna Maria Horsford 
    • That’s great news!! Thanks so much!!  
    • It would have been interesting to see Sam Groom back in the role of Russ, when the character returned in 1989 (or even in a later return).  David Bailey was acceptable as Russ, but he didn't have much acting range.  And if Russ and Rachel ever reunited, I don't think Bailey would have been the best choice, because Rachel's husband sort of becomes AW's leading man. I don't think Bailey would have risen to that challenge. But Groom could have done that wonderfully.  I would have also been okay with a complete recast -- hopefully with an actor with a good deal of soap opera experience and someone happy with the role long-term.   And to answer a question: I do not believe Russ's return in 1989 was originally meant to be short-term.  With the reveal that Josie was his daughter, and with Olivia on the canvas, there was lots for Russ to do.  I think Lemay's plan was that Russ return permanently, but Donna Swajeski probably didn't think he was exciting enough and lost interest in Russ.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • However, let me say this and I don't think it applies in the case of MM and BC. Straight actors shouldn't accept a role if they are unwilling to play intimate scenes that are often required in daytime. Imagine a gay actor accepting a straight role and saying they won't do any intimate scenes or have very limited intimacy with an opposite sex co-star. It wouldn't happen though, because the stigma works one way.  I think the limited intimacy has more to do with trepidation of how soap viewers will take it. The average soap viewer is older and more conservative and soaps aren't exactly drawing in younger eyes, so storylines have tended to lean more safe in the 21st Century especially in terms of sex and sexuality with a few exceptions.    On that note, I have finally caught up this week. I am loving the Anita stuff that is brewing and I'm glad TT is finally getting some meaty story to work on and not just be a mouthpiece to move others' stories along or play narrator. NuTed is not sitting well with me. I am having a hard time understanding the casting change, because the new actor isn't exactly hitting it out of the park and he makes the other characters play and feel different with how he plays opposite them. I'm going to give it time, but there was something more endearing about Ted #1  inspite of some of his acting shortcomings.  I am obsessed with Wig. Our girl is really crazy and I'm not sure they're going to be able to keep her on for long without turning her into a caricature or making the show a big joke, but for now mammaaaa (*Eva's voice*) is providing the dramatics.  I've said this before, but I'm super impressed by how far the actress playing Naomi has come. I wonder what she's been doing, because she's gotten so comfortable and the acting has vastly improved.  I have a feeling that Bill is going to say something about Martin being zesty and Chelsea is going to be there to overhear. I thought it was interesting that she didn't feel comfortable telling her father and the convo between Dani and Chels hinted that maybe he might be a little more old school in thinking. 
    • I disagree. I think Jill going off the rails made perfect sense.  It was a multi season process starting in season 8, climaxing at the season 9 cliffhanger, and continuing into season 10.   It was after Jill's story ended was when Knots Landing really went off the rails because it happened just as Abby was leaving the show.. and the Lathams didn't really have anything interesting to follow both of these events.
    • Thank you for that. I came into the show at a confusing time for Cliff because he just floats from one story to the next and his job appears to change. I like him even though I know I probably shouldn't since he's such a creep at times. I might have to go back and watch some of the previous stories because I'm missing some important pieces of Deborah and Geraldine's backstories.    Thank you for the explanation. I'm not sure I have the patience for that so I think I'll give it a miss. I must have bought it with the idea that it was going to cover her time on the soaps. 
    • David Bailey was the only actor that I remember as Russ. I was too young to remember Sam Groom or Robert Hover. When David Bailey returned in 1989, I thought the powers that be should have recast the part. However, I went back to watch some episodes with Bailey. Actually, Bailey was good. The show missed a great opportunity to keep Bailey on longer than six months. Bailey always great chemistry with Vickie Wyndham, Irene Dailey and Connie Ford. And he was good in scenes with Carmen Duncan. Russ could have been involved with Iris again and possibly Rachel with the return of Carl Hutchins. Charles Keating's reappearance in 1989 with Carl being involved with the Red Swan story.  Beverly Penberthy's return in 1989 would have been a treat. Pat could have played the aunt for Josie to lean on, and good romantic pairing later for Spencer Harrison. Even though Paul Stevens had passed away in 1986. I would have brought back the character Brian Bancroft; this time being played by Donald May or John Gabriel. Was the intention for David Bailey to return for only short-term purposes.
    • First up: Finishing up January 1974. Then on to 1973! FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 12/31/73-1/4/74 & 1/7/74-1/11/74:

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy