Jump to content

June 17-21, 2013: Bad Week For Soaps


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

GH lost all its sting it had. Back is Sonny and all that shooting nonsense top that with too much RH and Homewrecker and Doggy Daddy and thus the awful ratings.....the show is nowhere what it once was a few months ago....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They're always going to be called Lifers because they were added to the show with the intention of keeping OLTL alive in some way and then removed and forced back in because of their connection to OLTL. It's fruit of the poisonous tree. No matter what happens some part of the audience will always define them by their toxic origins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I suppose "some part of the audience", the bitter ones who apparently don't have anything better to do, will never let it go. That's their loss. I'm still enjoying GH. I've watched over 30 years of ups and downs. Believe me, it's been far worse in the past than it is right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me being on GH for a year and a half doesn't make you a GHer. That's not a disrespect, but the way it is for some. If Susan Lucci is on any program other than AMC for example I see her as an AMCer first. That's jus how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the #s speak for themselves. Overall, the audience aint buying what Craptini is selling! They have proven time and time again that they care nothing about GH, and if they can't have their baby, OLTL, they will do the next best thing, create The Other One Life To Live. No matter how much push back they get from the audience, Craptini are going to do what they want, and that is all this has really been - one big exercise of "we can do what we want and you can't stop us" followed by licking their tongues out, of course. You may not have liked who or what was featured in the past, but GH was never written this poorly, and the structure of the show is abysmal! It's just plain lousy, and putting 100 characters on in one eppy does not mean it's balanced!

Praise Jesus!

For me, it is not even about who they played the longest or was most popular. That is not the problem here. The problem is that GH is suffering because Craptini cannot let go of OLTL and the pets from that show. Three eppies this week featured what used to be The Q Mansion, and not one Q was in sight. Putting visible pictures of Edward, Lila, Alan, etc on the mantle does not change that Craptini's vision is and will always be OLTL. GH didn't need the 3 initially, but we dealt with it. But to shoe horn them back in with these ridiculous stories and highly feature them? That's just crazy. GH is in it's twilight years [Katie being in trouble may have bought the show a bit more time], and this is what the audience gets? I'm so calling foul!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the problem is the show assumes these three are beloved, regardless of the writing. This is why we got the story about Coleandhope right off the bat, when GH people who had little experience with OLTL had no idea who this woman was and why they were supposed to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't think they have anything to do with it. The ratings were down across the board. You just can't go by one week and then blame it on certain characters. I could see if GH dipped all by itself, but it's simply not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lmao. The funny part to me is the "bitterest" ones seem to be those who cannot stand that so many people are of the opinion that iGH is really horrid right now. It's just an opinion. Why so defensive and OTT with the resentment about people not liking it? We are having a good time. PnL can be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
    • Wonder if any of the Beyond the Gates people were asked. Admittedly, the show hasn't been on long enough for any of those actors to get much interest.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy