Jump to content

OLTL: Monday, May 6, 2013 Episode Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Finally watched this. Solid show, just like AMC. Both tonally different, but as I said for that show - they are on more sure footing with a lot of exposition out of the way, but what they each retain is a really different, slightly more sophisticated tone and pace. The profanity was not as forced today as a couple instances last week - it was very natural. I loved how they showed realistic, slice of life stuff with the guys - stealing wifi and setting up the router first, which is what I always do in any new place. There just isn't a need for either of these shows to try hard the way the network soaps do, trying to emulate a reality they've lost touch with - they just do it, very easily, or so they did today and most of last week. The pace is still very akin to primetime, and I think it could slow a bit, but I also like the briskness.

I'm still hoping they explain exactly how Victor survived and who shot him, if not Todd. I liked all that stuff today. Tea's house is lovely and while the googling 'murder' stuff was a bit silly, the cutting and camerawork when Victor infiltrated the hotel room was very distinct and fresh. Shelter was also gorgeous as a dinner spot. RH and KDP were great, as was Tuc, but I do hope Todd and Blair can stop having the same conversation they have had for the last year soon. I wouldn't mind seeing a couple of the ex-OLTL GH dialogue expatriates defecting back to OLTL soon, though I like these fine.

My only wrinkle with pacing today was when they had Dani declare that she and Tea had patched it up over a text message we did not see. They should've shown that talk as an actual talk. The initial argument, and her edginess with Matthew was excellent - freed from overly broad, cartoonish cliche writing for 'youngsters,' Kelley Missal is easily the most vital and fiery heroine this show has had since Melissa Archer, or Susan Haskell in the '90s. She is just a revelation day to day - I always liked her and thought she had talent, but she never, ever got stuff like this on ABC. It does still make me wonder what Kristen could do if pushed, but not enough to want Starr back for anything but a guest spot.

Poor Andrew Trischitta got exactly one line. But he delivered it well.

I liked Natalie in her lab coat at her cluttered office, shooting the [!@#$%^&*] with Nora, even if I don't care much for Natalie at the LPD. I'm really intrigued to see where all this goes for her, but she looks amazing. I assumed that was Clint's home office - it looked exactly like Viki's, maybe the same room at Llanfair. I liked them picking up the Matthew and Clint connection.

They need to shape up another Angel Square set. That corridor is fine, but is basically just a very slight redress of the alley on AMC outside Jane's Addicftion. I understand why they've done this given the tight budget and the conservation, etc. but I do hope that if these take off and more capital comes in, they can give us a proper Angel Square set. More storefronts, less generic street - Angel Square was diverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Agreed on everything--particularly the Angel Square comment, and the filming of Victor infiltrating Todd's.

I am with you about the pace. Overall I prefer it actually, but it still has a few flaws I think--the main problem today being how quickly Dani came around due to an off screen text (I also admit I kinda laughed how Matt and Jeffrey said they'd watch over her andthen basically taking off and not even saying with their new pad was...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking at them again after some earlier comments, I do think the pace on these shows is actually very similar to what I recall from Eastenders and some of Coronation Street - people bopping about within the span of a half-hour show, little vignettes playing out through the episode, from point A to B to C very quickly. I used to always be startled by that pace on those shows, but grew to accept it as a British soap thing. Now I'm having to accept it again - but I'm starting to think it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really in love with this! I think the OLTL really looks great and the sets are fantastic. I was hoping for more location shooting, but I think the sets stand out well enough that it doesn't bother me. It feels on par with a primetime production. I do notice that the sets are a bit smaller, but I also think the way they're filming them makes them look even more small. Not a big deal, but something I noticed.

Kelley Missal continues to impress me as Dani. I just can't believe I care about her at all. On the old show she was just useless and I honestly don't think she should've existed. Now I find she's even surpassing Starr and is on Erin Torpey's level in terms of being a fabulous young heroine for OLTL. Her acting has improved a million times! I like the balance they've struck with David as well.

So far every storyline and character has me wanting to "tune in tomorrow." I don't need spoilers or to know where it's going, I trust that it's going in the right direction. Of course there is always room to be better, but I'm so happy to see these writers knocking things out of the ballpark so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL

So Nata works at the LPD? I thought she was secretary/assistant to a vet from the set and her clothes. What is she doing there?

I like the young group and the UK soap vibe A LOT.

I hated Dani the first time around and I can't believe how much I like her now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does feel more like that--particularly in how a character will pop up in a new location without any talk previously about "now I have to go visit Uncle Clint, etc. It can be disconcerting at first, when I'm so used to the standard American soap pace, but I agree, ultimately it works well.

I think she has imp-roved as an actress, but IMHO it was often the writing that let her down before. I am in the minority, I guess, but she always seemed better than most of the cast her age--you'd always see her, for example, *reacting* to what others said, and not just waiting to deliver her next line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great episode! The show seems very confident in its storytelling; has meaningful, layered, and relatable scenes that involve both character and plot; and mixes interactions across the canvas. All the actors are also doing well.

I, too, loved the realism of the wi-fi, the furniture setup (neither super hard and something they made an exaggerated deal out of, nor easy, but just something that took a lot of time and they put to the side), and the Facebook friending.

Yep, that was funny that Matthew and Jeffrey left Dani after promising to take care of her.

I love the suspense of Todd being poisoned as the cliffhanger -- and of Todd also being watched like Victor.

I agree that there's somewhat of a British soap approach to the pacing of the scenes (which I believe cassadine1991 predicted as far back as the first look trailer thing) and the intermix of characters, and I agree it works.

Glad I am finding some common ground on this show even while I disagree some of y'all on some of the other soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kelley Missal is reminding me of Chelsea on Days, when Rachel Melvin really hit her stride. That's a very good thing. I wasn't a regular OLTL viewer in the last few years, but she's impressing me. (And Dani is 21 now, I guess? Sure, why not.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well she wasn't very good on OLTL when it was on ABC, but the show never really wrote for her character all that much.. especially when Starr and the Ford brothers were on. She was basically known as Starr's younger half-sister and Nate Ford's girlfriend, who was constantly wringing her hands over her relationship with Nate.

She's done a lot more in the past 5 episodes in terms of story and acting then she ever did when the show was on ABC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pretty much. But that can also be said for virtually all of her youth set scene partners on OLTL, excepting maybe Eddie Alderson, who grew by leaps and bounds in the last 4 years of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think we have learned by now that you can never be sure anyone's actually dead on a soap...
    • I think this has been one of the best years in a long time. In no small part due to the fact that so many countries have chosen to sing in their native language. Songs like the ones from Greece and Latvia have benefitted immensely from this, and made those two personal favourites of mine. I think Greece has the most incredibly beautiful staging and Klavdia's voice is outstanding. I don't think she has any real chance of winning, but if she did I would be ecstatic. Luxembourg is another favourite of mine and Laura (with her dancers) really sold that song with the new staging. Her performance in the final was flawless and I will be very disappointed if she doesn't improve on last year's result for Luxembourg (13th).
    • If those came from that mass-produced CD that was put out a while back, I'm afraid those episodes are wildly out of order and are very confusing to listen to. I had to painstakingly put them in order to make sense of things. I need to make my own CD to give to people just to try and fix the problem. Thankfully, I had time during the lockdown to do that. Just a word of warning. 
    • Some spoilery press photos:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • With so many reference to Caroline, how many months before 'Linus' appears? We already know *twins* run in the Spencer family. We know very little about Liam's birth, etc. Please tell me it'll never happen. Brad undercutting the significance of Steffy/Hope scenes, which were great, by having Steffy squeal to Taylor less than an hour later. I was initially glad that Carter finally got a leading man story, except they've completely destroyed what made him likeable - from the imaginary House of Forrester, fake LLC papers and, Friday, he blames everything on Hope. Gross. Daphne being certain that Hope would go back to Liam is contrived. She knows nothing about their history. How many times has the Nose met Liam? If, say, Katie, Ridge or Steffy made the suggestion, at least, it would be believable from those characters' history/point-of-view.  
    • Sometimes I forget Mindy had been married four times in the space of a decade. Those are Erica Kane numbers. 
    • This is Part 2 but I was wrong, there is no 3.  Today we are going review one of the questions: “What are your thoughts on the validity of the Daytime Emmy Awards?”  At this time, there was a lot of negative feelings about the awards, from the politics, the nomination process and even, where should they be held. MARY STUART: “No, comment.  No, I really think it’s silly.  It’s only an award for one particular performance, too.  It’s ridiculous.” CARL LOW: “I understand they’re trying to change the format of selection, because a one-shot performance does not reflect a year’s work.  Who can remember that one particular performance?” MARY STUART: “You’re supposed to save it.  Three years in a row my tapes were erased.  So I’m ineligible?  One of the other sponsors said they didn’t want anyone on a P&G show nominated.  Does that make sense?  And the people who really hold the industry together never have any juicy scenes.  People like Charita Bauer and Carl Low.  I wish it were not a national game, but instead, a peer activity.  I would believe in it if it were presented by our peers and it were private, within the industry from people who really care.  Then it means something.” Mary made some very valid points. Until 1976, except for her nomination in the first year, no actor for a P&G show was nominated in the first two years of the awards. So, 1974 one nominee & 1975 zero nominees. That means only one out of about a hundred actors over five shows (SFT, EON, GL, ATWT and AW) were not nominated. LARRY HAINES: “I don’t think there should be fewer categories in daytime than there are in nighttime awards.  If there is one for best performer, there has got to be one for best supporting performer, because nobody plays in a vacuum.  It’s not a one person effort.  The categories are voted on by a completely unbiased panel.” BILLIE LOU WATTS: “I agreed to be a judge last year.  But I was not allowed to vote for best actor because we had two for our cast were nominees – Larry (Haines) and Michael (Nouri).  I might be biased toward them.  I also could not vote in best actress, since Mary (Stuart) was nominated.  I could only vote in categories where I had no personal attachments.  The only problem about the daytime awards is that the great test of a performer on a daytime show is how well he performs all year long.  You can’t judge that unless you have someone who monitors it every week.  They have increased it from judging just one scene to three, but…” VAL DUFOUR: “I resent the Daytime Emmy Awards and will have anything to do with them, as long as were presented in the daytime, with stuffed animals, instead of at night. I’m a member of AFTRA (American Federation of Television and Radio Artists), Screen Actors Guild (SAG) and Equity (the theater union) and I want the work I do represented with other member of my profession.  As far as I am concerned, they are an insult to the actor.  Number one, they (Academy members) don’t even begin to understand how to decide or judge, to say nothing of the fact the whole premise is phony, because it’s a bought, political thing.  If you can get together 25 votes, then they’ll nominate you.  They have advised us not to put up any actor, unless he or she’s known for anything else, because we’ll be wasting our votes!  Now how do you like that!?  Another thing, where does he good performer come in?  It’s a different thing if you have a 2 ½ hour picture and you’re discussing this actor and only that performance – how can you do this on a soap?  The worst actor in the world can be brilliant in one scene – it has to be looked at in a broader scope; you have to get a continuity of an actor’s performance on a soap.  The Daytime Emmy’s are a raunchy, cheap marketplace that has nothing to do with the honor that should be placed on a beautiful performance.” MORGAN FAIRCHILD: “I’m very apolitical and consider the whole thing very political.  And I think anybody on the soaps realizes this.” MICHAEL NOURI: “I have mixed feelings about it.  Having been nominated for one was very flattering and having been nominated, I like that part.  But there’s something farcical about it: the Academy Awards, all awards. People are judged on the basis of one performance, which says nothing about somebody’s overall character portrayal.  I have seen some people come in for just a one-short.  I can sense how really good they are, but because of their nervousness, they’re just not relaxed enough to get to what they have to offer.  So the criterion for the awards is off-base, I think.” TOM KLUNIS: “In a way I think it’s good and gives recognition to the actor and the medium.  I think possibly it’s commercially necessary…” MARIE (MAREE) CHEATHAM: “That’s not high on my list of feelings.  How can you judge…If a performer is consistently fine and does something very interesting with very little material…that’s the trick in daytime.” LEWIS ARLT: “No comment.” MILLIE TAGGART: “I think the award for the male performer who won last year’s award was the most valid award ever given.  I can’t judge for any others, but Larry is a wonderful, wonderful actor-he’s the best that I’ve ever known.” JOHN CUNNINGHAM: All such awards are really invalid because the only way could really judge whose better for that year, would be if everybody contesting then played the same part. Because to say an apple is better than an orange is crazy. You just can’t do that.  That’s why George C. Scott was right to turn down his Oscar.  Somebody has to stand up every so often and say it’s a lot of crap.” MILLIE TAGGART: “You can have a wonderful story one year, while someone else is vacuuming…” JOEL HIGGINS: “It’s a very loaded question at this time because there is a furor raging between L.A. and New York about the whole thing and when it gets to the point, it’s silly.  You’re no longer awarding someone because they’re the best…You’re awarding them because they live in L.A. or New York.  I’m sure anyone who has ever won is talented.  But I think there are so many talented people-how you can possibly say this person’s better than that? It depends on the character, what they get to play…a million things. Stack the Emmy’s up against the Pulitzer Prize, where it’s not a group of nominees and only one winner.  They say, “We’re going to give 12 of them this year, because these were all good achievements.”” PETER SIMON: “Ludicrous, absolutely ludicrous.” COURTNEY SHERMAN: “I hate the idea.  Talk about various aspects of the business, the daytime drama is definitely a field unto itself; there really is a repertory company feeling here.  I don’t think it is ever to any one’s advantage to have competition for awards.  As dignified as everyone may act about it, I think it’s destructive and silly.  It’s different with a play or movie-they’re entities unto themselves, but I find the Emmys offensive. PETER SIMON: “The process of selection is all done on the number of friends you have for votes.  And this ridiculous competition now between the two coasts, as to where the Emmys are going to be handed out.  I mean, what are they talking about? In a soap, where does the performance end? There are certain people in the shows who have all the gravy and other really fine actors who do nothing but the drudgery.  The categories in soaps should be best recap, best getting through a scene without fainting…” COURTNEY SHERMAN: “Not that you can’t be a fine actor sitting and drinking coffee, but is that the scene you’re going to give to the board of judges?” Obviously a lot about the Emmys have changed since 1976.  But a lot has stayed the same as well.  Too many fine actors, both in Daytime and Primetime have NEVER been nominated.  Whole shows are ignored while others are nominated year after year.  Love of Life was only nominated for ONE acting award, and that was for Shepperd Strudwick, who has previously been nominated.  This year in primetime, Ted Lasso (an excellent show) got many nominations as it has every year, but Ghosts has been ignored again.  Different shows, but both excellent. What is your opinion?  
    • very danceable theme song https://x.com/iammskye1/status/1923509048416043443
    • You are not. I'm so happy that this storyline for Anita is finally showing movement. 
    • A shame that Santa Barbara lost the Andrades but I wonder what the Dobsons had in mind for them. From what I know of the Joe/Kelly situation, they didn't seem to know what to do with the Perkins. I don't think McConnell in particular gets enough acclaim for what she added to the show.  The Dobsons (from what I know of the show) didn't seem to know what to do with Augusta. This was especially true on their second go around but that was also Rauch getting back at her, so who knows?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy