Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Aw haha

OMG Liz looks so good. And I love that the show described her as "smart and beautiful." Haven't heard her described positively in YEARS!

I think Ellie being part of solving the mystery of the relish might draw Michael and Ellie together in Starr's absence (if she even comes back period). LOVE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't you remember. I called dibs for you back in January

This relish story is so stupid. Anyone else roll their eyes at Starr now being this science genius who can crack the formula? And they go and use a hospital lab to do their testing? SMH

Rolling my eyes at Frisco throwing Spinelli shade. Don't like Spinelli but loved him calling the deadbeat out on being just that....a deadbeat

WTF? Frisco broke Britt's leg? Can we get rid of this thug

Like I said before the framing Sabrina was stupid bc the cause of death was never the drugs.

WTF is Olivia in a full gown in a hospital room? Talk about doing too much.

KQXqP4r.jpg

Not big on JT but man he looked good in this shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

wub.pngwub.pngwub.pngwub.pngwub.png

The budding Michael Q / AJQ relationship is one of the best things that Ron has done for this show, as well as for the Michael character since I never thought that I'd ever tolerate - let alone like - him.

As much as I'll always loathe the fact that my AJ was robbed of the opportunity to raise his son from a boy to a man, I'm starting to see the silver lining of them getting to know one another as adults (albeit young adult to middle-aged adult) because they're building a mutual respect for one another that I've never seen between Michael Q and his kidnapper.

Another plus is that he's no longer trying to be a gummy-bear wanksta to garner Sonny's "respect" because he's already getting it (as well as a genuine interest in his opinion) from his actual father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I definitely rolled my eyes so hard I thought I popped something. I hate me some KA but at least they're reverting Starr somewhat from a pop princess although Jesus, I better not jinx it!

LOL I love anyone tormenting the Brittch! That said, him sharing the majority of his scenes with a random newbie is sooo unnecessary and stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Imagine the possibilities if Mary was the politically correct moral center of the Loves and clashed with Donna over her snobby socialite tendencies (once the re-recast was done).
    • Show starts soon. Wonder if we will get the Voice saying "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by Keith Robinson" and if they'll update the intro
    • I initially thought BTG was going for the Duprees being (somewhat) like the Kennedy family- wealthy and politically influential. And Martin's accident being like how Chappaquiddick (Link) caused Ted Kennedy to cancel his plans to run for president in the 1970s.  (He ran in 1980 but didn't get the nomination). But now it seems to have more layers that that, so I have no idea.
    • The episodes uploaded today by the YT channel have been done through the end of November 1985 and what a mess we have in the Liza/Sunny/Hogan/Lloyd/Estelle story. I think it would have been easier to gradually bring Hogan/Sunny back together.. maybe even addressing the toxic situation and trying to work through it.   Unrelated to all that, I see that Gary Tomlin has attempted to reset the show to where it was when he left at the end of 1983.  He really seems obsessed with regressing Wendy as a character after the progress/evolution of her character post 1983.. with her sleeping with her mother's new boyfriend.   Based on what I've watched of the show online... the one consistency was the mother/daughter relationship between Stephanie/Wendy... and even though Stephanie was recast, I think violating that relationship was a mistake. I can see why Tomlin didn't last long in this stint as head writer.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
    • Something self-defense is my guess, and I have a feeling maybe he was protecting someone close to him and the optics looked bad so Vernon/Anita covered it up (my guess maybe he was protecting Vernon/Anita).
    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy