Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Of course Carly wouldn't say anything. She wants to have sex with Todd, not Michael. For Carly, wanting to have sex will always trump protecting her child.

I thought it was funny that RoHo totally forgot his lines and then he meandered around trying to remember.

Poor Patrick. I'm sure he has no idea which shoe goes on which foot and when he should go to the bathroom without Robin around telling him these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some characters' views of Sonny and Jason have truly been insane and sick. This goes for Carly, Michael, Sam, Elizabeth, Courtney, etc. I don't think they hold themselves (or really more Sonny and Jason) to different standards, the writers don't let them acknowledge what goes on or they have them baselessly justify whatever new murder, attempted or successful, has occurred. I know some people hate the "writing" argument because, obviously, the characters will only ever do what's dictated in writing, but concerning everything that has to do with Sonny and Jason, I really do think it's a writing thing . . . except for Garin Wolf's interim stint and the first month or two of his brief head-writing tenure, no character (unless we're supposed to hate them and not take them seriously) is permitted to hold Sonny and Jason accountable, it just cannot and does not happen. Ever. Or it's "different." LOL.

But I honestly don't see how any of this is different from "One Life to Live's" answer to the Corinthos', the Mannings. Blair and Starr (and Tea) would only hold Todd (RH and TSJ) accountable when it suited them and even then, it was like for five seconds. And Jack was as bad, if not worse than Michael.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as I'm concerned Jackass is the equivalent of Eeyore, so I won't argue with you on that one.

However, I will always argue that Todd (and Frodd, to a lesser extent, since he was teetering close to Sonny territory before RH mercifully revised his role) has been held accountable and has suffered the consequences a helluva lot more than Sonny has since the late 90s and since Jasus ever has. The fact that neither Frodd, nor Todd, is liked or admired beyond the confines of their family (and even that is debatable), while 95% of PC kisses Sonny/Jasus' asses pretty much supports that.

To Sam's credit, the new regime has allowed her to question Jasus' being a Mafia hitman for Sonny (even if it did last for two seconds) - something that the previous regime would've never bothered to allow her to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ya, ITA that Todd on OLTL and Sonny/Jason on GH were/are presented differently in the context of the whole show, I was just pointing out in relationship to Michael/Sonny(/Carly), Starr/Todd(/Blair/Tea) aren't that different. "Frodd" (as you call him, lol; we can agree to disagree) was going to steal her baby, kill her boyfriend, etc. and Starr never stayed mad for long. Then Todd killed the man who she thought was her father for nearly a decade and, again, she didn't treat it like a very big deal. But Eli Manning, Ross Rayburn, etc.--she sure thought they were scum, lol. Blair and Tea's relationships with Todd were different from Carly's with Sonny, but as far blindly defending him, it was pretty similar. And Todd rarely holds himself accountable or just doesn't care, like Sonny. I don't know, family unit-wise, I think there's a lot in common. But ya, Todd's role on OLTL was very different from Sonny's on GH.

And Guza let Sam acknowledge Jason is a HITMAN who KILLS people as his CAREER (I can't even HANDLE it! lol) when we were supposed to hate her when Liason were the rooting couple. Case in point, lol. It's as if Guza (and to some extent GW as his tenure progressed and now kinda RC) was actually suggesting the characters pointing this out were wrong. blink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

After Todd became popular, the opposition to Todd was often tailored in a way where you couldn't help but love him. Todd was always the biggest victim in the room. No one suffered more. Blair hurt him. Peter hurt him. Being Victor's son hurt him. The only times this didn't happen were when he was used to make Tea more popular and when he became haha Todd in Howarth's last few years.

TSJ was just a smirking corpse and the show painted this as hotter than hot. Anyone who ever seriously questioned him had to be in the wrong - even our lip-pursing Mick Jagger impersonator had limited contact with him in the show's last few years.

Guza almost always put in comedy scenes, although most of them were stupid, or in poor taste, similar to iconic Cartini.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy