Jump to content

B&B Rumors - Cast Changes Coming!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am a little burned out by soaps' gabillionth anniversary this-and-that. B&B is the last soap that needs veteran returns to shore it up, frankly -- it has a strong core of characters (and original portrayers -- stand up Susan Flannery, Ronn Moss, Katherine Kelly Lang and John McCook) already on the show driving major story. The original Bill Spencer and Caroline may not be around anymore, but their presence in the form of DD's Bill and Spencer Publications is still being felt. As are the reconstituted Logans.

I haven't given Jessica and Dylan a passing thought since, like, 1995 -- it's not like they've been missed. Love Barbara Crampton but Maggie hasn't either. Sheila is truly overplayed and, anyway, Brad Bell's sister in law killed her off on Y&R. The only people I really want back are James Warwick and Sally Spectra (RIP, Darlene). I also like the younger set with Steffy, Liam, Rick, etc., and wish that stalwarts Thorne and Felicia would be given some meaningful story.

B&B should stop wishing it was Days for a hot minute and just do a cute episode featuring the core four like they did for the 20th anniversary -- and leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you, except for the part about the Logans - I loathe what Brad Bell did to them, especially Beth and Donna and Storm (who could have had story for years but some desperate Emmy bait about the nobility of suicide took precedence).

I don't think they need return characters, although part of that is down to that IMO B&B never really has had any strong, breakout characters over the years. The closest would be Taylor, who was, even if I wasn't a fan, iconic for many viewers, and a big "face" of B&B for much of the 90's. Other than that, most new characters have been middling or only good for a year or two of story, and many were criminally undeveloped.

The one I would want to see back - Deacon - is clearly never returning. Other than that I'd just like to see Felicia and Kristen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just don't understand if Brad Bell wants past favorites back USE Felicia, Thorne and Kristen! Possibly Macy, I guess. Use Clarke. Bring back CJ. James. Deacon.

And why was Amber brought back again? LOL. Bell can't ever write for any character not named Stephanie, Brooke, or Ridge. It used to be Taylor but he seems burnt out on her. And it's so obvious he's desperately trying to keep Nick viable, but I don't think he's a viable character in the least anymore.

Jessica? Dylan? Maggie? LMAO. I can't see that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA with you re: the Logans. Love Heather Tom as Feisty Katie but Jennifer Gareis is eminently superfluous now that she's not playing the gold-digging bimbo after Eric's money (SO much more fun to watch). William deVry had AMAZING potential as Storm -- chemistry with everybody, coupled with no genetic ties to the Forresters. I secretly hoped for a Storm-Felicia match-up -- his passionate temper matched by her ballsiness. I liked Storm so much that I actually stopped watching B&B for a while after the suicide, so incensed was I by the story which damn near ruined Katie for me, too.

RR was terribly miscast as Beth -- in my head, I had Judith McConnell as Beth and I guess my attachment to B&B was such that I couldn't let go of that. Beth's death was not needed and totally gratuitous, though. She should have just been written off back to Paris.

I would love to see Deacon back. This man would really drive story on B&B. Daytime Confidential's most recent podcast had the genius idea (I know people don't like DC but credit where credit is due) of having Deacon try and seduce Steffy in order to "expose" her and thereby help out Hope. I would suggest that he instead spies Steffy with Bill in flagrante and goes the blackmail route. With Amber, Bridget and Jackie all on the scene, not to speak of a resentful Brooke, Deacon has plenty to chew on. Rick also despises him -- I wouldn't mind seeing a SK-JY rivalry...

We all wishful-HW some of the soaps we like -- I tend to do that with B&B. laugh.png Just because SL potential is so often wasted. Like, another Spectra Steals FC Designs for the Billionth Time story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling? Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy