Jump to content

The NFL Thread


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is disturbing on so many levels. Even more so because the NFL/ Ravens saw the tape in its entirety and they’re pretending they never saw it till yesterday. They were willing to give this man a slap on the wrist because they viewed him as a product to their multibillion dollar brand. Every photo of Rice and his wife taken together her head is bowed in a completely submissive role. People are using the fact that she married him as an excuse to absolve his behavior. Honestly, I don’t know what on earth compelled her to marry this man after he knocked her out cold and I’m not even going to try. Obviously this isn’t the first time he hit her. His nonchalant attitude as he dragged her out of the elevator is unbelievably scary. Not one ounce of remorse as she lay slouched on the floor. Even after she came to outside the elevator, he just stood there towering a few feet away as she limply got up on her own. The fact that they made her hold a joint press conference with Rice when the tape first got leaked and she took partial responsibility is jaw dropping. He’s a despicable human being and the NFL just as despicable. It took public outrage for them to terminate his contract. If not, this man - and many players just like him (Hardy) - would continue to be playing in the NFL while fans glorified them as heroes.

Say what you will about TMZ but after months of the NFL doing absolutely nothing they released it the first week of NFL kickoff for maximum effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well this is the same league and team that praises and erected a statue of a murderer outside their stadium.

While this incident is appalling, disturbing, and extremely sad for her in particular, sports in this country has ingrained into it a culture of turning a blind eye to this kind of behavior in the interest of the almighty dollar. At that's at every level, high school(remember Steubenville), college(Penn State), and professional. And it's much more engrained, accepted, and ignored than I think even we all realize. The NFL in particular has become IMO now just a league full of thugs. I would say the commissioner at a minimum needs to go, but he's elected by the owners who only care about money and under his leadership, the league has grown and become more profitable than ever and has surpassed Baseball as America's sport IMO. And frankly I doubt it would change anything.

This all coming on the cusp of the NCAA dropping Penn State's postseason ban and the school will again be able to offer it's full range of athletic scholarships come 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perhaps she is with him because of the lifestyle she gets to maintain. She does not work, and yes, she married him after the heinous elevator incident. Does this absolve Rice? Absolutely not, but I won't be crying for her either. Now that he is unemployed, let's see how hard he is to leave.

I'm not being insensitive here because I grew up in a household where my father beat my mother weekly, and if we were lucky, several times a week. It was like clock work. Being a child and seeing your mother with swollen black eyes and watching your father twist her arm so far behind her back until she submits??? Yeah, been there done that. At the time, I was too young to ask the question "why did she stay". What I do know is that my father kept all 10 of us in nice clothes and we never wanted for much. One day, the police showed up and we watched them greet my father at the door to escort him in to get his things and leave. He was to never return and he didn't. My mother then had 10 mouths to feed with no job, skills or prospects. We had to go on welfare and many times we were hungry. For a time, we resented my mother for making our father leave. We didn't know any better.

Janay gets to wear red bottoms and carry purses that are in the 5 digits! She has many options, but when you get to live a certain lifestyle, you are more willing to put up with certain things. Marrying a man who put his fist thru your face? Oh well!

The NFL did nothing here but guarantee the money keeps rolling in. What did this do for domestic violence? Only showed rich abusers that they need to be more cautious of where they do their abusing.

What message do women take from this? Not one bit of progress has been made!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's sad.

Honestly there is nothing anyone can say that will make his behavior and even more so, the actions or lack of action on the part of the NFL in any way acceptable or excusable or remotely justified. The NFL has a history of looking away from the actions of those athletes who bring in the dollar. I for one am not ok with any organization or institution enabling this kind of behavior for money. And these are people that our children aspire and look up to? Yeah no thanks.

Nothing is going to change. Penn State's ban was removed let's all celebrate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's interesting because I had a discussion with my boss and I asked him why he thought she stayed with him after that attack. Without hesitation he said money. I thought he was oversimplifying the answer. Yes, money may be a factor but he portrayed women to be gold diggers -at the least the ones who stayed with rich men who repeatedly beat them and never left. To him, the days of the long suffering wife who is financially dependent on her husband as a means to survival were long over. I read an article in which the author said Ice Cube once told her relationship is like a transaction and sex is the payment. I have no doubt many of these rich, black athletes - and yes, I said Black - holds this view. If they don't like it they can leave since women are a dime a dozen. I'm not surprised Janay very swiftly and unequivocally defended her husband. Women abused by their husbands always do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think anyone is saying it shouldn't be about domestic violence. Yet there is a history of sports excusing the actions of a few for the almighty dollar. The NFL, the NCAA, and high school athletics have turned a blind eye to this kind of behavior in boys and men, setting a tone that it's "ok" to break the rules, therefore helping enable such behavior.

Plus these institutions actually have moral clauses that are in place that players and personnel are expected to follow. If someone can't adhere to those then they suffer the consequences, simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I felt the same way. I'm more outraged by the legal system for letting him off with a slap on the wrist.

That said, it's been apparent for years that the NFL is an organization of psychopaths. The concussions, the tax exempt status, the way they turn a blind eye to violence and crime, the Washington team name, the bullying, the homophobia, etc...there's nothing redeemable about this organization but that won't stop people from throwing money at them. Come game day, all the people clutching their pearls will be right there in the stands. Football fans (40 percent of whom are women) have proven time and time again that they don't care about anything but the game.

If she's really in this just for the money, the best thing she could do is bide her time, kill him and collect his estate and life insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The NCAA doled out the wrong punishment. Taking away scholarships and imposing bowl bans (or now, championship contention) doesn't address the culprits. Instead it punishes individuals who had nothing to do with either the crime or the cover-up. It's infortunate that the NCAA continues to punish the wrong people and no challenge is ever made to that. Punishing the players who are still on a team, for instance, because of infractions/violations by someone who "escaped" to the NFL is ridiculous.

Jerry Sandusky's Penn State enablers (all those who looked the other way) should be punished, not the players or the new coaching staff. Hiding behind the institution and making others pay for crimes they didn't commit is not proper punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Domestic violence is another topic that society in general does not know how to resolve or properly address. Whenever society does not know how to deal with a particular issue, it's allowed to fester and periodically gets the spotlight when something the media finds noteworthy occurs.

I don't see the point of racializing this as it pertains to athletes. And I don't think generalizing the habits of rich black athletes does anything either. How does anyone know that "many" of them aren't about family values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most of the people who were involved or known to be involved are gone.

I think the problem is not just one incident it's a culture that has been prevalent there and at the big universities for years. It's really not much different than the NFL, in that the interest in attracting the best players, going to the biggest bowl games is not about love for school or academics. It's all about money. Frankly I don't see what the issue is with barring them from bowl games, who exactly is that hurting.

How do you break or change that culture? It takes more than NCAA sanctions, but again this was a situation, you broke the rules and moral clauses the NCAA has in place, you pay the price. It's unfortunate that scholarships to students who really wanted to goto Penn State were withheld(and I am not talking about those who go to get the extra perks the sports programs give them or just go as a stepping stone to the NFL). But the NCAA is a joke similar to the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand that money is the main draw for some, but I don't want to assume that every college football player or basketball player is in it just for the money (in terms of pro potential). Some of them probably already know they won't go pro and just love the sport, comraderie, etc. Whose to say that the chance to compete in a bowl game might not be one of the highlights of their athletic lives? I wouldn't want to have worked for years to get on a college team with hopes of playing in a major bowl game, only to have that taken away because some administrator or coach violated rules, et al.

NCAA sanctions should be revised so that they fit the violation instead of the one size fits all approach. Just like the NFL, they do not have punishment that fit certain actions so they make it up as they go along. Look how a two-game suspension was made into a six-game suspension policy, and a video turned two-games into an indefinite suspension.

None of the discussions surrounding this seem to be about addressing the actual issue in terms of implementing any type of program for NFL players and their spouses/partners. Instead it's about getting rid of the commissioner, speculating about Ray Rice's football future, labeling his wife as a gold-digger, and on and on. Some of those issues need to be pursued but suggestions for changes should be somewhere in that discussion.

I may watch ESPN but I despise it with a passion at times like these. All these disingenuous people mechanically saying it's disgusting and acting as if they are morally above all of this. Why have people who are not knowledgeable about abuse sit there and spout off nonsense about such a serious topic? Some of them are guilty of the very things over which they sit there and judge others. I wish they had a show that only reported information and nothing else (no commentary, analysis, bloviating).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've always considered that Paul Avila Mayer was hired by Ellen on her way out the door, but I also wondered if NBC was trying to keep Mayer in their writers' stable after he failed to work out on "Santa Barbara."  Mayer and Braxton were fined for writing during the strike. I believe there is an article mentioning it somewhere in this thread.  I don't hate Mayer and Braxton's run. I found Jeanne Glynn's run very dry in what I've seen until about her final month or so when she starts to focus on the reveal that T.R. is the lost Rebecca Kendall. Mayer and Braxton didn't always have amazing stories, but I found the characterization was deeper (if not always true to who the person had been). There were some scenes I really enjoyed.  The misogyny comment is interesting and is something I hadn't considered. I found the tail end of Braxton and Mayer's run interesting when the all male board at Tourneur Instruments gave Liza grief for shacking up with Hogan, which seemed to be broaching the subject in a way that showed it was wrong. I will say, however, there is a scene much earlier in their run where Liza starts to think of herself as aging because of having a teenage daughter that now makes me lean to agree with you.  I thought Liza and Hogan had nice chemistry and I loved the fact that Hogan was clearly more into Liza than Liza was into Hogan. Sunny's fate in that story was awful. Sunny rarely had good stories once Hogan left the first time.  Bassett played Selina McCulla, a nurse who worked at the Riverfront Clinic. Her brother was Joseph Phillips' Cruiser McCulla, who was Ryder's pal. They were introduced in early 1985 by Jeanne Glynn and written out very quickly in Braxton and Mayer's run. Cruiser got a formal write out; he was sent off to study computers out of town. Selina appeared at the clinic in some situation after Cruiser left and then was never seen or mentioned again.  I want to say they sent TR off to college, but a later post says she went to Switzerland. I think Krakowski was in some play at the time. Maybe it was Starlight Express. The chemistry is still there for me in October, 1985, when Hogan and Sunny are investigating the poisoned water storyline that dovetails back into Hogan / Liza / Lloyd.  I am a Gary Tomlin apologist but his second run is frenetic, not always in a good way.  Evie was probably going to be revealed to be someone's daughter. Stone was her stepfather, wasn't he? I don't think introducing a younger female from the lower class was a bad idea, but I don't know if I would have gone with Evie / Quinn. I was briefly intrigued by the chemistry test between Adair and Ryder.  I don't mind Jeffrey Meek, but I find him very attractive so maybe I am biased in my appreciation of his work.  I definitely felt the Kendall reset in October with Chase going to the paper and the mystery of San Marcos leading to Estelle and the return of Steve. I don't like Lloyd Bautista much as an actor, but he would have been better off playing Martin Tourneur by that point but not as a crime boss. When does John Whitsell takeover? Is it November? When I watched these episodes a few years back, October, November, and December seemed like almost three different shows. November was a glaring jump from the material Tomlin started to set up in October and by December it seemed like everything from October was gone.  Stephanie / Wendy / Bela is a horrid story. I thought the initial concept of the story was smart (Wendy trying to prove that Bela was a cad by luring him into bed but I couldn't see Wendy actually falling for Bela). The only direction I would have accepted was a Stephanie / Wendy / Bela story that ended with both women murdering Bela and getting away with it.  I didn't know they had already set up Liza's exit. Thanks for sharing a new detail. I struggle to watch the November-December 1986 episodes when they are online. It just seems like such a different show. I don't think the decision about T.R. was that noble. I think it was clear that Jane Krakowski wasn't staying and Robert Reed as Lloyd wasn't going to work out.  I think the show wanted to go full steam ahead with Evie / Cagney and Suzi was considered expendable.  Tomlin was writer for both Sarah's death and Patti's arrival. I don't know if the producer change had happened yet or which producer approved those decisions. I'm pretty sure Nicholson was out in November at some point. Sarah's death is the impetus for Patti's return; she comes back to Henderson to find her daughter's murderer.  I think details get lost to history. For years, Tracey's existence was never mentioned on soap opera message boards when I first started. Interesting, Sarah Whiting was also rarely mentioned and I am not sure Michelle Joyner is listed in cast lists for most of the soap books that cover the final years of "Search for Tomorrow." I cannot remember if Tracey was mentioned from the beginning. I know she is mentioned by July, 1985, when Sarah is at the McCleary family dinner. I think Kate asks Sarah about her family and she mentions her sister and brother.  I think Sarah's adoption was mentioned only under Tomlin, but I might be wrong on that. I feel like it was stated by Jo in explaining to Suzi (or maybe someone else) about why Sarah had a constant need for approval.  Lundquist didn't work for me as Steve, but I was disappointed how quickly Steve was dumped a second time.  I have never understood why the show dropped Phillip Brown as Steve or why there wasn't an immediate recast given the importance of the character to the narrative. Clearly, it was a Ellen Barrett issue because Tomlin brings Steve back less than two months into his 1985 return.  I think the shift to the twins, Chase and Alec, was probably to skew the show younger and keep Lloyd involved as there was part two of the Kendall vs. Tourneur/Sentell story to play out with Travis and Liza raising a Kendall. Originally, from what I've pieces together, it looked like Adair was the mother of Elan and one of the Kendall boys was the father. I wonder what this meant was the plan for T.R. or if she and Elan were both intended to be Kendalls, which would have been overkill.   I agree that the deconstruction of the Wendy / Quinn / Sarah story was a mistake. I think Tomlin leaned into one of his favorite tropes (turning the uninspired heroine into the bad girl) and used it with Sarah, though it seemed like Mayer and Braxton may have already been heading in that direction. I didn't love the music angle of the story all that much, but I loved that it pitted Quinn against Chase and I would have enjoyed that rivalry a bit more. When did Quinn become Stephanie's assistant? Was that under Tomlin? I thought that was a smart move.  I think Stephanie/Wendy/Bela is one of the worst story choices. When Stephanie called Wendy a slut, I was like we've reached a point where I no longer recognize anyone involved.  The Suzi / Wendy stuff falls apart very early in Mayer / Braxton as I think Jeanne Glynn was gearing up for a longer Wendy / Suzi custody suit over Jonah as Suzi's mental health continued to collapse. I felt Braxton and Mayer even hinted that they might go with Wendy pursuing Cagney for a moment, but instead we got Wendy / Quinn / Sarah, which I really liked. I felt Sarah being the Jo's granddaughter and a manipulator against Wendy's more mature and adult complicated heroine was an interesting choice that should have been allowed to play longer.  I felt that Jeanne Glynn built a lot of potential, but never really lit the match and was able to use it in stories. That may be because she didn't have enough time. I felt her last month or so was very solid and was finally going somewhere after mostly not going anywhere. Justine's departure didn't bother me. They had played a lot of Justine / Chase as well and Wendy / Alec. There was a lot of building of foundation, but the story never got anywhere.  The shifts in story are remarkable and depressing to consider. Lots of the potential was intriguing, it just rarely reached a productive stage because, as you have said, a writer or a producer was always coming in and making their mark. 
    • Just had a random thought that Vanessa Bell Calloway would be good casting for Sharon (The Articulette who hung up on Anita). She usually plays nice, but if you saw the Temptations biopic you'll remember she was pretty good playing that crooked manager that ripped them off. She might also sing because in Polly and Polly Comin' Home her character sang but I can't tell if it was a dub or not. Lastly, she did AMC and DAYS for short stints so she is no stranger to soaps.
    • I don't know if this counts for you but Bill Bell did a terrible short plot with an overweight character (Joann) who tried to French kiss Kay Chancellor.....if you google you'll find a link called Lezwatch.tv that has an article about it.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxpFaAp_UY/ Roman vs. Stefano, Cliff top, Beach Below This is one of the most important scenes on DAYS in the 80s. After this nothing was ever the same. DAYS 11-23-84   @JAS0N47Closing Credits roll & it's complete silence. Isn't that unusual?
    • Mack was the show's moral compass and his groundedness complimented Karen's hysteria perfectly. Also, Kevin Dobson was the best looking male cast member with a huge fan base. He was never going to be killed off...
    • As others (I think) have said, Long just didn't get Nola and Quint. I guess it would've been hard to write them into adventure type stories with two kids, but they just fell off the map after AJ's birth. (or even the wedding/honeymoon) Long would've had to rewrite something, because Alex forced the Chamberlains out of Spaulding in the fall of '84. Not that she couldn't have just ignored it and written Quint and Henry being involved at the firm. I swear there was some plot point she just literally ignored that surprised me, but as I'm floating around between years, I can't recall what it was. lol Has anyone found the first day of the Kyle/Lewis dinner party up in English? After he took over Lewis Oil, Kyle arranged a dinner party. All hell breaks loose--Mindy admits to shooting Kyle, Vanessa remembers Reva's accident, and Billy and Reva get into a screaming match and she tells HB that Billy blackmailed her out of her Lewis shares. The last three minutes (or so) of the episode are up, where Kyle tells the assembled that HB's his father. And the next episode picks up with Sally entering the fray. Y'all know I'm dying to hear Billy and Reva go at it. As dicey as '85 is, I love it anytime when Billy isn't Reva's bitch.  
    • The original premise of "Santa Barbara" was that a Lockridge (Warren) killed a Capwell (Channing), who loved an Andrade (Santana), while a Perkins (Joe) went to jail for the crime. I think once the show started to pull away the threads by eliminating Joe and naming a new killer a lot of the show's original potential was lost. I contend, like others, that the fault lied in the uninspiring casting, which leads me to wonder if that's why the show became so keen on casting soap veterans for nearly every pivotal role.  The failure of the Perkins family was definitely a casting issue followed by a lack of interest in committing to the original onscreen characterization. I was fascinated watching the early episodes and realizing that the Perkins had been financially wiped out by the trial, which was an underlying current towards John's animosity towards his son. Then, the additional complication of Marissa's nearly incestual affection for Joe that led to her cutting off John sexually was a wild moment to witness, but not as strong as it could have been with a stronger actor in the role of John Perkins. Melissa Brennan wasn't the right choice for the aspiring young vixen that Jade was intended to be. Brennan may have breathed life into Laken, but I'm not sure how Julia Ronnie would have done in the role of Jade.  Despite the recorded history, Christina Robertson and Sarah Gallagher weren't sisters; they were aunt and niece.  I don't think it would have hurt to make Marissa and Augusta sisters, but I think it would have made the Joe / Augusta seduction impossible unless you truly mimick "Rituals" and make Joe Sarah's stepson. I think a childhood friendship between the two women would have worked. It would have also given Augusta someone to confide in about the situation involving Peter Flint and herself as Marissa would have been aware of Peter from her work at the pre school. As childhood friends that were estranged by class differences, I think a relationship between Augusta and Joe (and later Augusta and a sexually frustrated John) would have had multiple layers to play out giving a deeper impact on Augusta's involvement in both of the men in Marissa's life. And because I have thought about this all too much, I would have Augusta and Marissa square off again when Jade, after marrying Ted while pregnant, learned that the little Capwell heir was in fact an imprisoned Warren's son only for Augusta to ultimately keep mum because with Ted married to Jade he wasn't free to pursue Laken.  I imagine the Andrades would have slowly been withdrawn from the Capwell inner circle as the truth about Santana, Channing, Jr., and the baby came to light for everyone. In what I seen in the 1980s, Rosa confronts C.C. once about the baby and then seems to move on. Early in the run, the actor playing Reuben claims he and Bridget Dobson had a falling out and implied that she was racist which led to the character fading into the woodwork.  I know I am like maybe one of two people who liked the 1990s run of the Dobsons, but I loved the set up for Santana / C.C. with the Andrades having owned the land that Oasis sat on years earlier posing Santana to come into money while also potentially landing a position where she could raise Gina's son with C.C. if C.C. and Santana could have secured custody of the child. With Eden gone, I would have gone back to Santana and Cruz, but if not, I think Brick should have returned to be Santana's conscience and potential love interest.     
    • Well, I'm not going to shoot you, so no worries there. If it's subpar i hate hearing that. It was an old DVD not even mine a former partner. I thought why not make use of it. Serves me right for thinking. But to be clear, white label, www.radiomemory.com 
    • Just compared the open on Friday's episode with the first week episodes. I think the difference is that the bass line is much more apparent -- stronger and harder.
    • Phew, that was close to disaster!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I suspect we would have had a few withdrawals next year if Israel had won. I don't think many people would relish going to Jerusalem as things stand now. Not to mention it would have been a prime target for terrorist attacks.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy