Jump to content

August 15-19, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have a feeling OLTL is going to do a Victor/Todd murder mystery, which may keep ratings high through the fall.

(And about your other comment....total viewers and households mean nothing to networks or advertisers. In the only thing that matters, OLTL continued to climb.....That said, I don't watch the show anymore, anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL will definitely fall next week due to the pre-emptions. When NYC's 0.0 demo rating (along with other big east coast cities 0.0 demo ratings) is factored in, OLTL will drop, no way around it.

Yep, dead last, and unlikely to be renewed past its November 2013 contract expiration.

I think they're just not educated about ratings. They don't know enough about them to know that Households/TotalViewers don't matter. Advertisers don't buy based on viewers; they buy based on WHO is watching. Some soap fans just don't understand that, or know about that, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're sweet C, but I don't think that's it.

Anyway, I agree I think OLTL will go down next week. Was watching my DVR and we got interrupted here in NYC again because of the impending storm. It doesn't really matter. It's been doing pretty decently for months now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. I really don't get though why that hasn't changed somewhat--the demo that they all want more and more now isn't even home to watch the soaps at that time. Wouldn't it make sense to try to play up the older demo? (Yes I know advertisers don't find them as desirable for many reasons, but it still baffles me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that the 50+ demo is undesirable (that's a myth), it's that the 50+ demo is easy to find, so it's cheap to advertise for. Just about every show on TV has a huge 50+ audience, so advertisers aren't willing to pay a premium for them. (They can advertise on just about any primetime show and reach a substantial 50+ audience). They pay a premium for viewers that are more difficult to find, and those are the key demos.

Advertising rates are set by certain demos on broadcast TV, and never on households/viewers. Those demos are:

Women 18-49 for daytime.

Adults 25-54 for morning news shows, network evening news, and Sunday news shows.

Adults 18-49 for primetime shows, and late night shows. (A BIG premium is paid for men 18-34 in primetime, since they are notoriously difficult to find....and the CW sells based on women 18-34).

Then there are the niche markets, like Nickelodeon for instance, who sells based on the 2-11 demo (seriously).

There is NO PROGRAM that makes money based on households/viewers, period. Even the SuperBowl is sold based on its 18-49 potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree the only numbers that matters are the demos but the problem is the demos are bad regardless of OLTL gains and the fact that Y&R is falling is an indication that and I know some don't want to believe this but ABC was right in cancelling AMC/OLTL. 1.1-1.2 demos are what primetime repeats gets, the daytime environment can no longer sustain soaps like it or not that is the reality the audience is just not there. Moving them online and possibly to a cable channel may be the best thing for the genre where smaller numbers are acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, to put part of that in perspective....even at the peak of the soap ratings in the 1980's, they were also doing no better than what primetime repeats were getting, lol. That 8.0-9.0 rating in the 80's was at times even lower than repeats in primetime were getting at the time. (And in the 18-49 demo, Y&R, GH, and OLTL have been the top shows in daytime for most of the summer).

That said, yes, daytime soaps are no longer as profitable as they once were....but OLTL was still profitable when it was canceled. And for The Revolution to retain the same profitability for ABC, it would still have to garner at least a 0.8 in the key women 18-49 demo...and there is no guarantee it will.

I do believe this is the end for all soaps, though. Despite Bob Greenblatt's recent endorsement of DAYS, there is no way it gets renewed again past September 2013. And B&B and Y&R are dead in November 2013 and September 2014, respectively.

Ironically, though, if The Chew bombs out of the gate, ABC might be smart to work out a deal with PP to continue to air OLTL until Katie Couric's show kicks off next fall....and maybe beyond if The Revolution also tanks and/or GH doesn't show a substantial women 18-49 demo lead over OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, what is profitable to you may not be to Disney and unless you know exact numbers and can state them I am going leave the money issue alone because if OLTL was as profitable as you are stating it would not be getting cancelled. Bottom line is Disney likes making money and if these soaps were making them money on the level that they wanted they wouldn't be where they are now.

I really doubt that OLTL is ever going to see it's self on ABC daytime again, I could be wrong but I am thinking that if either The Chew or Revolution fail that ABC will just go with another talk show. I just really doubt that ABC leased OLTL and will now turn around and pay PP to air them in their orignal spot that is not smart business at all, if Disney had an indication of changing their minds with OLTL they would have jumped on the PP plan and air them on one of their cable channels (Soapnet would have been a great outlet until it changed to Disney Jr, with it's built in soap audience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy