Jump to content

Joan Collins on Fat People, Asians, Reagan love, and Warren Beatty, etc


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sorry for causing trouble, but seriously, if Joan had made the same type of "outdated" comments regarding gay people, I doubt that some would be so dismissive of the things she said. There does seem to be a double standard here.

Being a conservative, I obviously loathe our culture's need to be overly politically correct. However, there is a difference between being politically correct at all costs (i.e., refraining from saying anything that many be perceived as remotely "insensitive" by a minority group) versus saying things that are just downright insulting towards minorities (which is what Joan did in reference to fat people).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl, I wasn't referring to the backlash that Joan would get from the American public at large, but rather the backlash Joan would be getting from those who are gay. Somehow, I just don't think Qfan and some others would feel it's alright (at Joan's old age) for her to call gay people "homos" and "queers" because those are "outdated" comments. (Whereas Qfan used this very rationale to explain why it was acceptable for Joan to refer to Asians as "Chinamen.") And how would any gay person feel if Joan said that she felt sorry for homosexuals, because (as she explained was the case for the obese) they will have trouble fitting into "mainstream" society?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would depend on the context and the history of the person. A lot of people who may support gay rights do end up saying some tacky or inappropriate comments. If gay people got upset every time this happened they'd never stop being upset. If anything there's often as much criticism of gays who don't like these comments as there is about the people who make them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Daytime fan is absolutely correct about the Reagan/Thatcher thing... she's too busy being fabulous to be really intrentched in political BS. And I certainly do not equate "chinamen" with "queer"... one is a slur, the other is an outdated descriptive term. I don't see "chinamen" being any different than "russian", Mexican", or whatever... granted, in the US, we would say "chinese", but I just chalk that up to the british way of speaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Being neither gay nor Asian, all this is mere speculation on my part. That being said, I think a reasonable person could conclude that some Asians might find the term "chinaman" just as offensive as some gay people would view the term "queer." This especially holds true if the particular Asian being called "chinaman" is actually Korean, Japanese, etc. (And apparently, Collins uses the "chinaman" term when referrring to any Asian.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While over 50% of Americans weigh more than what is considered healthy, only a relative minority of people appear morbidly obese.

Furthermore, my college sociology textbook states that not all minority groups are statistical minorities. Rather, a minority group can be any group of people who are discriminated against in mainstream society. (For instance, blacks in South Africa--despite representating over 80% of that country's population--are considered a minority group because they have historically been treated as second class citizens.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obesity in the majority of American states is between 22-30%. That is a deadly number and Joan is correct that they are digging their own graves with their teeth. As a physician I am never going to accept that fat is something to be accepted. Fat is dangerous and unhealthy. Joan's rude about weight, that's her issue, her point, however, remains valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the difference is even in Joan Collin's day, calling people "homos" was deemed an insult so that is something she would know better about. Its not like that word suddenly fell out of vogue last year or even twenty years ago. With that in mind, I don't think there is even a chinaman's chance she would ever use that phrase. But I could see her saying "oriental" and not "asian".

I remember this poster well

ppol0006m.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen it posted elsewhere people saying "Veronica" should be on this show. My response is always going to be hell no.  You're definitely right about these characters catching on with the audience. Everyone has their favorite. I was pleasantly surprised people have some for Doug. 
    • If the show was interested in tying in one of the three prime time specials in the 90s, the smarter choice probably would have been Night Sins from 1993. Night Sins was the ushering in of Titan Publishing, the first mentions of Kate Roberts coming in to run it, plus it had involved Jack retyping a manuscript he had found in the new house he and Jen moved into... which ended up being a thinly veiled story written by Kate about her dalliance with Bill Horton that produced Lucas. However, I doubt the writers were even thinking about the prime time episodes when deciding to name the manuscript One Stormy Night.  I also don't see Stephanie being the one that would be writing it.  The current actress playing Stephanie seems to play a more passive version of Stephanie vs the previous takes by Shayna and Shelley..imho. Javi is cute... much too good for Leo.  He can do so much better.
    • I might've gone after someone like Jed Allan, or even Donald May. Though they're very different.
    • Same.   Looking forward to seeing what I missed later. And God bless him for coming back!!! I was so happy to see him again! But...will he be for Dani...or Nicole? Hmm
    • Question for all: Who would have made a good Mike recast after Stewart departed?
    • I think they did. Again, it is not an either/or proposition for most of the audience so far. Most don't feel the need to stan one or reject the other.
    • KKL on Bold Live on May 1st. Details here  
    • I do wonder if the show realized that fans would take to Silk Press and Eva as much as we have?    To me, I think the core four was mostly used to get eyes on the show since all four were familiar performers in both daytime and primetime.   Of the four, I think Nicole is used most effectively where it doesn't look as though she's hogging airtime.  She works as a lead and as a talk to. Anita has been the most under utilized of the four, but I do have a feeling that might be changing once the Ted/Nicole/Eva/Silk Press Story goes back to support status. Of the four, I think Dani has been over-used.. but I do still see potential for the character.  I know some people think she's the modern day Erica Kane, but I don't see that.  Erica was a Have Not that became a Have while Dani is a Have by birth and has done nothing to have earned being a Have. Good cliffhanger.
    • LOL now this sells it for me!  I can't wait to watch later tonight!
    • I think this is a great observation.  I do wonder if some of that was down to how Nixon had started writing story and plot outlines.  By this point (maybe even by the mid 70s) many have discussed how she *didn't* write detailed story outlines anymore--the focus more was on a mood or theme and ABC simply allowed that because they trusted her at this stage (in her "memoir" I think even Megan McTavish talks about Nixon's writing in this way in the 90s and she basically seems to admit that it worked for Nixon.  But if Nixon wasn't in charge of the daily execution of these ideas...) What was with the ABC soaps around that time bringing in Aussie "hunks" from Heartbreak High?  Richard (Corey Paige?) Tanner on AMC (Vince Poletto) OK not from Heartbreak High but didn't Ingo Rademacher start on GH around this same time?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy