Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I understand, My enthusiasm with each announcement I read convinces me Frons and his minions still have their hands in this. On the positive side I do think they will be forced into changes because the online audience does not or will not have the tolerance or patience to put up with the BS these shows have been airing. They have a lot less patience than the 40 year soap watchers network TV currently holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"Out of interest?" You ranted to anyone who could listen about how this was the resurrection and the life for weeks. You knew these shows were not starting up in September. You claimed you were these shows' biggest cheerleaders in the new format and that anyone who didn't like it could suck it because you were sure you would finally get yours. I can only conclude that when you heard these shows were being reinvented, you thought they meant reinvented to your exact whim. Like every other soap fan. Me, I think I'll wait and see. I'm still pretty excited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's a rumor going around this weekend that "PP was at the OLTL studio this past week," whatever being "at the studio" means. Saying "Hi!" to anyone who happened to be on the set that day (or just silently observing operations)? That would exclude those who weren't scheduled to work, are finished taping or are on vacation (like ES who takes her annual month-long vacation during August). Has anyone heard that PP actually did send a rep or reps to the OLTL studio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://www.tvguide.com/News/Jacob-Young-Bold-Beautiful-1036391.aspx

I think Jacob Young makes a good point here:

TV Guide Magazine: Were you open to doing this internet version if the B&B offer hadn't come along?

Young: I sat in on the meeting with Prospect Park and was listening, that's for sure. I applaud their ambition. I think [the move to the internet] has a chance but my biggest fear is all that time in between.

TV Guide Magazine: It's a legit concern since it now appears the reboot won't be ready until January at the earliest. Millions of viewers failed to return to their soaps after all those preemptions for the O.J. Simpson trial.

Young: It will take a lot of advertising to bring awareness that the show has moved to the internet and to keep interest going during that gap. Also, this idea of the show moving to a Hulu-type [platform] is confusing to a lot of people. I took a little poll of my mother-in-law's friends — all of them watch AMC — and almost none know what Hulu is or how that sort of thing works. But these Prospect Park people are very credentialed and they told us they'd been developing a Monday-to-Friday serial of their own when AMC and One Life to Live were cancelled. Their take was, "This is exactly the format we're looking for. It has a built-in audience. Why don't we buy the rights, buy the sets, lease the building and see how it goes?" Hey, it's the future. Even if they lose money on this, it's the pioneer effort that will pave the way for everybody else.

a bit more:

To let opportunity pass by during this time of uncertainty is just kind of silly. I couldn't wait around. I spoke to some of my cast members and advised them all to get out there in the business and see what's crackin'. Anybody with common sense would do that. I've talked to a lot of the AMC production staff and they're saying that if these deals with Prospect Park aren't put in place by September so that the production and the writing can get back up and rolling, it's going to be very difficult logistically. That January launch date would be very optimistic, to say the least.

TV Guide Magazine: There are still so many questions. What will people be paid? How restrictive will the contracts be? What about benefits and insurance? There's still a union deal to be struck.

Young: It was weird. At our actors meeting with the union, our union rep said, "So tell me what you want us to be fighting for?" And I was, like, "What the hell do you think you should be fighting for? Isn't that what unions are created for? You're asking us?" I've been paying for a pension since I was 18 and I'm not going to let that go. I had to strike while the iron's hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which leads me to believe they already had the grant funding secured. I always felt it was ludicrous to think PP just all of a sudden decided to do this when the shows were cancelled and they miraculously got grant money when that process normally takes months and even years to secure.

JY brings up a valid point. I keep hearing about how many people watch online but there are more people who have no idea or what the heck any of this is or means. I think it would actually be exciting to be part of being on the ground floor of this but I can understand any actor, writer, or producer wanting to stay with something more secure and stable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A lot of people have said that about how few viewers may switch to online-only; I just wish they'd asked him if he'd heard anything about cable channels.

So do I, but he won't be getting that at B&B, which dumps most actors after a year or recurs them into oblivion. He'd be better off trying Y&R or primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unions wow.

He's lucky they still get secured pensions as 90 percent of the US workforce out there's pensions have been eliminated. Makes me feel a lot less sorry for anyone in the entertainment industry as someone who's company eliminated pensions 8 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really had to stay focused on the rest of the interview after I read that part. :lol: That's amazing that there are people out there still interested in launching a 5 days a week serial. If this venture is successful, we may see that new soap come to fruition, which is something many of us never thought we'd see again.

Meanwhile, I didn't know that JY had been officially/out in the open been made an offer by B&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love how fast they updated the opening, if this were BOLD it'd take over a year lol  I gotta admit Keith is winning me over 
    • Catching up with the episode now. Is it me or did the addition of the new Ted in the opening titles come with a slight remix of the theme tune?
    • From the episodes I've seen during the last few months of the shows run, the show wasn't in a perfect nor horrible place.  It was decent. The highlight of the judge story was Ann Flood playing a completely 180 character from her Edge of Night days.  And Stu/Jo having good focus. I think the Ireland story was an attempt to hop on the bandwagon of 80s location shoots.. and solidifying the McCleary's as the second major family outside the Stu/Jo combination family (though killing Suzi off was misguided.. especially considering Terri E had this likable everywoman element)   I also see that Tomlin came back to headwriting again in late September/early October 1985... and the first thing I noticed was the mask was off Sarah and the gloves were off with Wendy.  The two had good antagonistic chemistry.. and Tomlin was misguided killing her off and deep sixing the Sarah/Wendy/Quinn triangle. The alternative for all three proposed by Tomlin didn't seem any better with Wendy being put in a Suzi/Warren redux situation except it was her mother Stephanie and her new boy toy Bela.  The move was plot driven and not character driven. Meanwhile Sarah is killed off just as she figured out the weird Bela/Wendy vibe and threatening to go to Stephanie... and Quinn has this sudden fascination with working class Evie that made no sense.   As Marcia McCabe said during the Locher Room interview she had... she said each EP/headwriter would come in and remake the show and this done too often.   And seeing the episodes from 1983/1984/1985 posted... she's correct in that view. For example, Wendy and Suzi's friendship was threatened by Warren and their mutual interest in him... but that seems to fall by the wayside due to the numerous Suzi recasts. Then a random character Justine comes on.. and the show spends months building her up as the antagonist... establishing a potentially good rivalry with Wendy.  And in fact, Quinn/Justine are tested in the spring of 1985 before she leaves/is dropped.. and Sarah is introduced.  Sarah is a character with no history with Wendy... and the show spends weeks setting the foundation of a rivalry between former schemer Wendy and new schemer Sarah while fighting over Quinn. Then just as the foundation has been laid down.. poof Sarah is killed off and Wendy is sleeping with the man her mother is seeing. Typing all these whiplash changes makes me understand why viewers were confused/unattached the show.... and all I typed was Wendy's situation (we won't even go into the Liza and Sunny whiplashes during that same period of time).  
    • I loved how todays show had so many people mixing it up.    Leslie loving horror films made me love her even more lol Yes and todays episode has me thinking that shes gonna use Ted's newfound love for his daughter to her advantage and try to re win him 
    • The show seemed to burn through the Kendalls considering how many there were. How do you think the show handled them? Why did they tape off? Was it casting issues? How would you compare them to the McClearys? If the show had continued, would there have been a future for the family?
    • Oh and love how Leslie seems fixated 24/7 on her agendas but finds time to chill out with a horror film...
    • I agree. But Timon has chemistry with just about everyone but his character's wife. lol. I love the fact that Bill is so spiteful that he's messing with Martin and Smitty's marriage with what he knows.   Most def. And I love every moment of it with her Blair Waldorf coded self. I'm sure it will loop back around to the triangle soon enough.    I had a different theory on who Hayley is related to, but if her and June turn out to be related I wouldn't mind. Hayley definitely needs something to do other than stalk her husband.   
    • Oh I actually like that Vanessa has an sex addiction (or more to the dangers of it it seems)--there's a lot that they can do with it.  I just find the interactions we've seen with her and the men she roleplays with, always in restaurants it seems, are really weirdly scripted.  I mean I know a bit about roleplay, and this is just weird *that's all I'll say* LOL "The breakdown for the episode was ok, but some of the lines were a bit off (except during the Anita scenes and the Smitty/Bill scenes)" Completely agree with everything in this statement.  (And yeah, actually I find myself enjoying the low-stakes Anita storyline a bit to my surprise.  Far more interesting than just hearing them yet again bragging about how important they were to "the cause" and at all these marches, etc.  Even when Vernon proved such a bad singing--which of course we know the actor who has sung on Broadway isn't...)   
    • Omg...the way that Bill is manipulating Smitty and messing with his words. Oooo that's the type of scheming man I would think he would be.   Not Jacob at Silk Press Sheila's door to take her to the station!!!!    Nice cliffhanger. And look at next week!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

           
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy